Skip to main content
Log in

Practical importance of neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease

  • WORKSHOP W5
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Consensus could be reached that there is overwhelming evidence of preclinical neuroprotection. However, the evidence of neuroprotection/neurorescue under clinical conditions is limited. Lessons from clinical trials designed to show neuroprotection (selegiline, amantadine, dopamine agonists) demonstrate that with the drugs available neuroprotection/neurorescue has to start as early as possible. A PET-controlled clinical trial with ropinirole shows that there seems to be a good chance for neuroprotection in the early phase of Parkinson's disease in patients treated from the very beginning of the disease while there is no such benefit in patients with a late start of a neuroprotective therapeutic strategy. Also long-term clinical neuroprotection cannot be reached. Complicating factors to demonstrate clinical neuroprotection are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riederer, P., Gille, G., Müller, T. et al. Practical importance of neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 249 (Suppl 3), iii53–iii56 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-002-1311-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-002-1311-2

Navigation