Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dental age assessment and dental scoring systems: combined different statistical methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Age Estimation has been considered as a human basic right, carried out through the use of tables for dental age assessment based on the chronology of tooth eruption. As such, the final aim of this investigation is to create tables with applicability to the Portuguese population, for the different scoring systems used and combined different statistical approaches.

Materials and methods

For this purpose, dental age assessment was achieved in all four third molars, using different scoring systems, in a total sample of 626 orthopantomograms (324 females, 302 males), aged between 12 and 25 years old, from the database population of Lisbon North University Hospital Center, approved by the Ethic Committee.

Results

The values of validation showed excellent results both on precision and on reproducibility. Mostly all methods showed statistically significant differences between the estimated age and the chronological age and, therefore, the presence of estimation errors. Kullman’s and Mincer’s methods are the ones with best applicability in the Portuguese population, in the lower third molars. The reliability measures (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) values decrease as age increases.

Conclusion

A combination of the scoring systems as a protocol for dental age assessment in Portuguese nationality was established. Tables, for all the scoring systems used, were made with applicability in the Portuguese population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data were registered, including data that was deleted or changed. Anonymized data were exported for statistical calculations. After the database lock, the data was saved according to current regulations.

References

  1. Saunders E (1837) The teeth, a test of age, considered with reference to the factory children. Addressed to both Houses of Parliament. Renshaw, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. United Nations Convention On The Rights Of The Child (1989) BMJ 298(6686):1477–1478

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira C (2012) Medicina Dentária Forense. Lisboa, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman AD (1982) The scope of forensic dentistry. In: Cottone JA, Standish SM (eds) Outline of forensic Dentistry. Yearbook Medical, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pereira CP, Rodrigues A, Augusto D, Santos A, Salvado F, Santos R, Cameriere R (2021) Forensic age estimation using new models of mathematical regression formula constructed with molar indexes: dental age assessment. J Stomatology 74,2:95–100. https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2021.106540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pereira CP, Rodrigues A, Santos A, Salvado F, Santos R, Cameriere R (2021) Cut-off for the legal ages in the Portuguese Population by Third Maturity Index: measures of Accuracy. Archieves Oral Biology 125:105089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Augusto D, Pereira CP, Rodrigues A, Cameriere R, Salvado F, Santos R (2021) Dental Age Assessment by I2M and I3M: Portuguese legal age thresholds of 12 and 14 Years Old. Acta Stomatol Croatica 55(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc55/1/6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Decreto Lei nº 147 de 1 de Setembro (1999) Diário da República: I-A Série, No 204.

  9. Decreto Lei nº 166 de 14 de Setembro (1999) Diário da República: I-A Série, No 215.

  10. Decreto Lei n.º 401/82, de 23 de Setembro

  11. Decreto Lei nº 48 de 15 de Março (1995a) Diário da República: I-A Série, No 63. artigo 19&#186

  12. Decreto Lei nº 496 de 25 de Novembro (1977) Diário da República: I Série, No 273. Artigo 178&#186

  13. Fracasso T, Wirth I, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2023) From Deutsche Zeitschrift to International journal of legal medicine – 100 years of legal medicine through the lens of journal articles, part 4: International journal of legal medicine from 1990 to 2022. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03107-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (2018) EASO practical guide on age assessment. https://doi.org/10.2847/292263. Second edition

  15. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS). Online age verification methods for children. PE 739.350 (2023) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2023/739350/EPRS_ATA(2023)739350_EN.pdf

  16. Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B et al (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122(6):457–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. International Organization of Standardization (ISO) (2023) DIS 5365. Dentistry — Designation system for tooth developmental stages

  18. Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE (1993) The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci 38(2):379–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kullman L, Johanson G, Akesson L (1992) Root development of the lower third molar and its relation to chronological age. Swed Dent J 16:161–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Demirjian A (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Human Biology 45 – 2

  21. Kohler S, Schmelzle R, Loitz C, Puschel K (1994) Die Entwicklung Des Weisheitszahnes als Kriterium Der Lebensaltersbestimmung. Annals Anat 176:339–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Haavikko K (1970) The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. Suom Hammaslaak Toim 66(3):103–170 PMID: 4917152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moorees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt EE (1963) Age variation of formation stages for permanent teeth. J Dent Res 42(6):1490–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gleiser I, Hunt E (1955) The permanent mandibular first molar: its calcification, eruption and decay

  25. IBM Corp, Released (2022) IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 29.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fleiss J (1986) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. John Wiley Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. ADA Technical Report (2020) No. 1077. Human Age Assessment by Dental Analysis

  28. Rath H, Rath R, Mahapatra S, Debta T (2017) Assessment of Demirjian’s 8-teeth technique of age estimation and indian-specific formulas in an east Indian population: a cross-sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci 9(1):45. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_84_15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Brkić H, Galić I, Vodanović M, Dumančić J, Mehdi F, Anić Milošević S (2022) The Cameriere, Haavikko, Demirjian, and Willems methods for the assessment of dental age in Croatian children. Int J Legal Med 136(6):1685–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02891-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gupta S, Verma AK, Patil R, Singh US, Kumar N, Bhattacharya S (2023) Comparison of Demirjian and Cameriere methods and development of modified Cameriere and Demirjian formula more efficient for north Indian population. J oral Maxillofacial Pathol 27(1):138–147. https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_228_22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hostiuc S, Edison SE, Diaconescu I, Negoi I, Isaila OM (2021) Accuracy of the Demirjian’s method for assessing the age in children, from 1973 to 2020. A meta-analysis. Leg Med (Tokyo) Sep 52:101901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.101901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pires AC, Vargas de Sousa Santos RF, Pereira CP (2021) Dental age assessment by the pulp/tooth area proportion in cone beam computed tomography: is medico-legal application for age estimation reliable? J Forensic Odontostomatol 39(2):2–14

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bagherpour A, Imanimoghadda M, Bagherpour M, Einolghozati M (2010) Dental age assessment among Iranian children aged 6–13 years using the Demirjian method. Forensic Sci Int 197(1–3):121e1–121e4

    Google Scholar 

  34. Boaz K, Nagesh K, Srikant N, Gupta N, Nandita K, Manaktala N, Lewis A (2015) Demirjian′s method in the estimation of age: a study on human third molars. J Forensic Dent Sci 7(2):153–157

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramaswami T, Rosa G, Fernandes M, Oliveira R, Tinoco R (2020) Third molar development by Demirjian’s stages and age estimation among brazilians. Forensic Imaging 20(200353). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fri.2020.200353

  36. Pereira CP, Santos R, Nushi V, Lameiro MV, Antunes P, Carvalho R, Major T, AlQahtani SJ (2023) Dental age assessment: scoring systems and models from the past until the present-how is it presented in the court? Int J Legal Med. 2023;137(5):1497–1504

  37. Santos R, Martins JP, Felgueiras M, Ferreira L (2019) Accuracy measures for binary classification based on a quantitative variable. REVSTAT - Stat J 17(2):223–244. https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v17i2.266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Antunovic M, Galic I, Zelic K, Nedeljkovic N, Lazic E, Djuric M et al (2018) The third molars for indicating legal adult age in Montenegro. Leg Med 33:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Balla SB, Banda TR, Galic I, Naishadham PP (2019) Validation of Cameriere’s third molar maturity index alone and in combination with apical maturity of permanent mandibular second molar for indicating legal age of 14 years in a sample of South Indian children. Forensic Sci Int 297:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Balla SB, Chinni SS, Galic I, Alwala AM, Machani P, Cameriere R (2019) A cut-off value of third molar maturity index for indicating a minimum age of criminal responsibility: older or younger than 16 years? J Forensic Leg Med 65:108–122https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Centro de Estatística e Aplicações da Universidade de Lisboa, CEAUL, FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Grant Project reference UIDB/00006/2020 for supporting this research (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00006/2020), as well as Professor Francisco Salvado the Director of the Stomatology Department of Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria for help concretizing this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiana Palmela Pereira.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Study performed was approved and realized in accordance with the ethical standards specified by Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.

Informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. No informed consent was obtained since this was a retrospective study based on anonymized clinical records.

CRediT authors

Conceptualization: Cristiana Palmela Pereira.

Resources: Cristiana Palmela Pereira.

Formal Analysis: Rui Santos.

Supervision: Cristiana Palmela Pereira.

Validation: Ana Rodrigues, Valon Nushic.

Investigation: Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Rui Santos, Ana Rodrigues, Diana Augusto, Adriana Santos, Valon Nushic.

Methodology: Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Rui Santos.

Writing-original Draft: Ana Rodrigues.

Writing – review and editing: Cristiana Palmela Pereira, Rui Santos.

Project Admnistration: Cristiana Palmela Pereira.

Conflict of interest

All authors have participated in this study and there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pereira, C.P., Rodrigues, A., Augusto, D. et al. Dental age assessment and dental scoring systems: combined different statistical methods. Int J Legal Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03216-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03216-0

Keywords

Navigation