Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a multiplex panel with 31 multi-allelic InDels for forensic DNA typing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insertion/Deletion (InDel) polymorphic genetic markers are abundant in human genomes. Diallelic InDel markers have been widely studied for forensic purposes, yet the low polymorphic information content limits their application and current InDel panels remain to be improved. In this study, multi-allelic InDels located out of low complexity sequence regions were selected in the datasets from East Asian populations, and a multiplex amplification system containing 31 multi-allelic InDel markers and the Amelogenin marker (FA-HID32plex) was constructed and optimized. The preliminary study on sensitivity, species specificity, inhibitor tolerance, mixture resolution, and the detection of degraded samples demonstrates that the FA-HID32plex is highly sensitive, specific, and robust for traces and degraded samples. The combined power of discrimination (CPD) of 31 multi-allelic InDel markers was 0.999 999 999 999 999 999 85, and the cumulative probability of exclusion (CPE) was 0.999 920 in a Chinese Han population, which indicates a high discrimination power. Altogether, the FA-HID32plex panel could provide reliable supplements or stand-alone information in individual identification and paternity testing, especially for challenging samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Weber JL, David D, Heil J et al (2002) Human diallelic insertion/deletion polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 71:854–862. https://doi.org/10.1086/342727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altshuler DL, Durbin RM, Abecasis GR et al (2010) A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467:1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mills RE, Luttig CT, Larkins CE et al (2006) An initial map of insertion and deletion (INDEL) variation in the human genome. Genome Res 16:1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4565806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaiser VB, Van Tuinen M, Ellegren H (2007) Insertion events of CR1 retrotransposable elements elucidate the phylogenetic branching order in galliform birds. Mol Biol Evol 24:338–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bunting SF, Nussenzweig A (2013) End-joining, translocations and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13:443–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lieber MR (2011) The mechanism of DSB repair by the NHEJ. Annu Rev Biochem 79:181–211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131.The

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ripley LS (1982) Model for the participation of quasi-palindromic DNA sequences in frameshift mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79:4128–4132. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.13.4128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira R, Phillips C, Alves C et al (2009) A new multiplex for human identification using insertion/deletion polymorphisms. Electrophoresis 30:3682–3690. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200900274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira R, Pereira V, Gomes I et al (2012) A method for the analysis of 32 X chromosome insertion deletion polymorphisms in a single PCR. Int J Legal Med 126:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0593-2

  10. Lan Q, Shen C, Jin X et al (2019) Distinguishing three distinct biogeographic regions with an in-house developed 39-AIM-InDel panel and further admixture proportion estimation for Uyghurs. Electrophoresis 40:1525–1534. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201800448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pereira R, Phillips C, Pinto N et al (2012) Straightforward inference of ancestry and admixture proportions through ancestry-informative insertion deletion multiplexing. PLoS One 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029684

  12. Fondevila M, Phillips C, Santos C et al (2012) Forensic performance of two insertion-deletion marker assays. Int J Legal Med 126:725–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0721-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell CD, Eichler EE (2013) Properties and rates of germline mutations in humans. Trends Genet 29:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, Zhang S, Zhao S et al (2014) Population genetics of 30 insertion-deletion polymorphisms in two Chinese populations using Qiagen Investigator® DIPplex kit. Forensic Sci Int Genet 11:e12–e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tao R, Zhang J, Sheng X et al (2019) Development and validation of a multiplex insertion/deletion marker panel, SifaInDel 45plex system. Forensic Sci Int Genet 41:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin R, Cui W, Fang Y et al (2021) A novel panel of 43 insertion/deletion loci for human identifications of forensic degraded DNA samples: development and validation. Front Genet 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.610540

  17. Chen L, Du W, Wu W et al (2019) Developmental validation of a novel six-dye typing system with 47 A-InDels and 2 Y-InDels. Forensic Sci Int Genet 40:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Qu S, Lv M, Xue J et al (2020) Multi-Indel: a microhaplotype marker can be typed using capillary electrophoresis platforms. Front Genet 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.567082

  19. Li J, Lin L, Jiang B et al (2020) An 18 multi-InDels panel for analysis of highly degraded forensic biological samples. Electrophoresis 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202000245

  20. Huang J, Luo H, Wei W, Hou Y (2014) A novel method for the analysis of 20 multi-Indel polymorphisms and its forensic application. Electrophoresis 35:487–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201300346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yao Y, Sun K, Yang Q et al (2022) Assessing autosomal InDel loci with multiple insertions or deletions of random DNA sequences in human genome. Front Genet 12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.809815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Byrska-Bishop M, Evani US, Zhao X, et al (2021) High coverage whole genome sequencing of the expanded 1000 genomes project cohort including 602 trios. bioRxiv 2021.02.06.430068

  23. Lan T, Lin H, Zhu W et al (2017) Deep whole-genome sequencing of 90 Han Chinese genomes. Gigascience 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansson O, Egeland T, Gill P (2017) Characterization of degradation and heterozygote balance by simulation of the forensic DNA analysis process. Int J Legal Med 131:303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1453-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gouy A, Zieger M (2017) STRAF—a convenient online tool for STR data evaluation in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 30:148–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Montgomery SB, Goode DL, Kvikstad E et al (2013) The origin, evolution, and functional impact of short insertion-deletion variants identified in 179 human genomes. Genome Res 23:749–761. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.148718.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor MS, Ponting CP, Copley RR (2004) Occurrence and consequences of coding sequence insertions and deletions in mammalian genomes. Genome Res 14:555–566. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1977804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Levinson G, Gutman GA (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 4:203–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang S, Zhu Q, Chen X et al (2018) Forensic applicability of multi-allelic InDels with mononucleotide homopolymer structures. Electrophoresis 39:2136–2143. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201700468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xie J, Shao C, Zhou Y et al (2014) Genetic distribution on 20 STR loci from the Han population in Shanghai, China. Forensic Sci Int Genet 9:e30–e31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. LaRue BL, Ge J, King JL, Budowle B (2012) A validation study of the Qiagen investigator DIPplex® kit; an INDEL-based assay for human identification. Int J Legal Med 126:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0667-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M et al (2001) DbSNP: The NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 29:308–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.1.308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kidd JM, Sampas N, Antonacci F et al (2010) Characterization of missing human genome sequences and copy-number polymorphic insertions. Nat Methods 7:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee Y gun, Lee J young, Kim J, Kim YJ (2020) Insertion variants missing in the human reference genome are widespread among human populations. BMC Biol 18:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00894-1

  35. Opel KL, Chung D, McCord BR (2010) A study of PCR inhibition mechanisms using real time PCR. J Forensic Sci 55:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01245.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sidstedt M, Hedman J, Romsos EL et al (2018) Inhibition mechanisms of hemoglobin, immunoglobulin G, and whole blood in digital and real-time PCR. Anal Bioanal Chem 410:2569–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0931-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Fund of China (82171875 and 81901925).

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Fund of China (82171875 and 81901925).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhui Xie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of School of Basic Sciences, Fudan University (NO.2019-C015) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All participants gave their informed consent and their right to privacy was protected.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. S1

Profiles of ultrasonically degraded samples at different levels amplified by the PowerPlex® 21 system. Artificially degraded samples with peak fragment lengths at <150 bp (a), 150 bp (b), 200 bp (c), 300 bp (d), 400 bp (e), and control group with no ultrasound treatment (f) were adopted. (PNG 1771 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 5680 kb)

ESM 1 1

(XLSX 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, Y., Sun, K., Yang, Q. et al. Development of a multiplex panel with 31 multi-allelic InDels for forensic DNA typing. Int J Legal Med 137, 1–12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02907-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02907-w

Keywords

Navigation