Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incidental findings in forensics: are we sure that it is a question easy to deal with?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

References

  1. Børsting C, Morling N (2015) Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 18:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Council of Europe (2014) Guidelines on the role of court-appointed experts in judicial proceedings of Council of Europe’s Member States. Document adopted by CEPEJ at its 24th Plenary meeting. https://rm.coe.int/168074827a. Accessed 10 Mar 2020

  3. Williams R, Wienroth M (2017) Social and ethical aspects of forensic genetics: a critical review. Forensic Sci Rev 29:145–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wienroth M, Morling N, Williams R (2014) Technological innovations in forensic genetics: social, legal and ethical aspects. Recent Adv DNA Genet Seq 8:98–103. https://doi.org/10.2174/2352092209666150328010557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boardman F, Hale R (2018) Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: a comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings. Mol Genet Genom Med 6:1079–1096. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koplin JJ, Savulescu J, Vears DF (2020) Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings. BMC Med Ethics 21:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-0449-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Christenhusz GM, Devriendt K, Dierickx K (2013) To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical refections on incidental findings arising in genetics contexts. Eur J Hum Genet 21:248–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perry TJ, Patton SI, Farmer MB, Hurst CB, McGwin G, Robin NH (2020) The duty to warn at-risk relatives-The experience of genetic counselors and medical geneticists. Am J Med Genet A 182:314–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Middleton A, Milne R, Robarts L, Roberts J, Patch C (2019) Should doctors have a legal duty to warn relatives of their genetic risks? Lancet 394:2133–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32941-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suter S (2019) Legal challenges in genetics, including duty to warn and genetic discrimination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med a036665. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a036665

  11. Michaud K, Fellmann F, Abriel H, Beckmann JS, Mangin P, Elger BS (2009) Molecular autopsy in sudden cardiac death and its implication for families: discussion of the practical, legal and ethical aspects of the multidisciplinary collaboration. Swiss Med Wkly 139:712–718

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elger BS, Michaud K, Fellmann F, Mangin P (2010) Sudden death: ethical and legal problems of post-mortem forensic genetic testing for hereditary cardiac diseases. Clin Genet Mar 77:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01293.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, University of Padova, Via Falloppio 50, 35121, Padova, Italy

    Luciana Caenazzo & Pamela Tozzo

  2. Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Kris Dierickx

Authors
  1. Luciana Caenazzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela Tozzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kris Dierickx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.C. and K.D. contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by L.C. and P.T., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Tozzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caenazzo, L., Tozzo, P. & Dierickx, K. Incidental findings in forensics: are we sure that it is a question easy to deal with?. Int J Legal Med 135, 591–592 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02427-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02427-5

Search

Navigation