Histological age-at-death estimation in white South Africans using stereology
- 30 Downloads
Various methods are available for estimating age from skeletal remains, amongst them the use of histomorphometry. It is generally argued that age estimation standards are population specific, but this in itself creates problems as the reference samples used are often not large enough and/or lack substantial representation of all age cohorts. Traditional age methods have been shown to suffer from problems such as age mimicry. This paper aims at establishing histological age-at-death standards for the white South African population by supplementing the available sample (lacking an adequate number of young adults) with another sample of European descent to avoid over-estimation of age in younger individuals caused by age mimicry. Bone microstructures related to the number of osteons and fragments, osteon size and Haversian canal size that change with advancing age were used for the development of regression formulae. A histomorphometric assessment of the anterior cortex of the femur was done using stereology for the estimation of age at death. All sections were analysed using the optical fractionator and nucleator probes. A sample of 94 bone sections (n = 50 male, n = 44 females) of white South African individuals were used. A sample of Danish individuals (n = 14 males, n = 16 females) was combined with the South African sample to create a normal age distribution for the reference sample. Single and multiple regression equations were developed after randomly selecting a hold-out sample (n = 14) for validation. Osteon size (average length, surface area and volume) showed the highest correlation with age, followed by the number of osteons and fragments per grid area. Haversian canal size showed inconsistent changes with advancing age. Using the regression equations, predicted ages were obtained for the 14 individuals. RMSE values ranged between 14 and 17 years, which we deemed acceptable.
KeywordsFemur Age estimation Stereology Linear regression Age mimicry
The authors would like to thank the curators of the Pretoria Bone Collection and Raymond A. Dart Skeletal Collection for granting access to the remains, Prof. Paul Manger for use of the stereology system and Dr. A. Bhagwandin for assisting with the production of the stereology images.
This project received financial support from the National Research Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of informed consent
Ethical approval for the project was obtained through the University of the Witwatersrand.
- 4.Boldsen JL, Milner GR, Konigsberg JW, Wood JW (2002) Transition analysis: a new method for estimating age from skeletons. In: Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW (eds) Paleodemography: age distributions from skeletal samples. Cambridge University Press, pp 73–106Google Scholar
- 11.Kimura K (1992) Estimation of age at death from second metacarpals. Z Morph Anthropol 79:169–181Google Scholar
- 21.Hauser R, Barres D, Durigon M, Derobert L (1980) Identification par l’histomorphometrie du femur et du tibia. Acta Med Leg Soc 30:91–97Google Scholar
- 25.Crowder C, Heinrich J, Dominquez V (2009) Histological age estimation. In: Blau S, Ubelaker D (eds) Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, pp 222–235Google Scholar
- 29.Howard CV, Reed M (2005) Unbiased stereology: three-dimensional measurements in microscopy, 2nd edn. New York, BIOS Scientific PublishersGoogle Scholar
- 30.Botha D, Lynnerup N, Steyn M (submitted) Inter-population variation of histomorphometric variables used in the estimation of age-at-death. Int J Leg MedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Maat GJR, Van den Bos RPM, Aarents MJ (2002) Manual for the preparation of ground sections for the microscopy of bone tissue. Barge’s Anthropologica Nr. 7. Leiden University Medical Centre: Leiden, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 34.West MJ (2012) Introduction to stereology. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2012:843–851Google Scholar