Advertisement

How should living entomological samples be stored?

  • V. BugelliEmail author
  • C. P. CampobassoEmail author
  • R. Zehner
  • J. Amendt
Original Article

Abstract

Sampling and storing insect evidence alive are important tasks in forensic entomology as it can impact survival and growth rates. To investigate the effect of cooling and storing of insect evidence before its arrival in the laboratory, samples of all three larval stages of the blow fly species Lucilia sericata and Calliphora vicina were analyzed. A first group was stored at room temperature and a second one in a refrigerator (~ 5 °C) for 16 h, all without air, supply of food, and sawdust. Afterwards, they were kept at 6–8 °C in a Styrofoam box for 8 h, simulating a transport situation. Mortality rate (MR) was calculated and 25% of the surviving larvae were killed and measured to check for interim growth. The remaining alive specimens were reared at 25 °C until adult’s eclosion for estimating a possible storage impact on survival during later development. The results were then compared with a control which was not temporarily stored and chilled but left feeding in boxes with an air-permeable lid on food substrate at 25 °C.

A 24-h temporary storage stopped the larval growth in comparison with the control especially in early larval stages in both species. A high MR of up to 100% for third instar (L3) larvae stored both at room temperature and in a cold environment without air supply was found. Oxygen supply can reduce significantly the MR at least for L3 larvae of L. sericata. Findings provide scientific evidence for the recommendation to store larval samples at cold temperatures with both oxygen and food supply. The high MR for samples of the last larval stage clearly shows the need for a fast delivery after sampling and a more sophisticated storage procedure like, e.g., providing air supply. Storing live samples at room temperature without air access should be avoided.

Keywords

Forensic entomology Sampling Storage Calliphora vicina Lucilia sericata 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers very much for the relevant improvement to the article made by their precious and valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Amendt J, Campobasso CP, Gaudry E, Reiter C, LeBlanc H, Hall MJR (2007) Best practice in forensic entomology—standards and guidelines. Int J Legal Med 121:90–104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-006-0086-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gennard DE (2007) Forensic entomology: an introduction. Wiley, Chichester, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Byrd HJ, Castner JL (2010) The utility of arthropods in legal investigations, second edition. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amendt J, Anderson G, Campobasso CP, Dadour I, Gaudry E, Hall MJR, Moretti TC, Sukontason KL, Villet MH (2015) Standard practices. In: Tomblerin JK, Benbow ME (eds) Forensic entomology – international dimensions and frontiers. Taylor & Francis Inc, Florence, USA, pp 381–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magni PA, Dhaliwal SS, Dadour IR (2016) Effect of continuous and cyclic exposure to a cold environment on the development of larvae of Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in different sized larval masses. J Med Entomol 53:782–789.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjw036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayward SA, Saunders D (1998) Geographical and diapause-related cold tolerance in the blow fly, Calliphora vicina. J Insect Physiol 44:541–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faucherre J, Cherix D, Wyss C (1999) Behavior of Calliphora vicina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) under extreme conditions. J Insect Behav 12:687–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Block W, Ernzinclioglu YZ, Worland MR (1990) Cold resistance in all life stages of two blow flies species (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Med Vet Entomol 4:213–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davies L, Ratcliffe GG (1994) Development rates of some pre-adult stages in blowflies with reference to low temperature. Med Vet Entomol 8:245–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grassberger M, Reiter C (2001) Effect of temperature on Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) development with special reference to the isomegalen- and isomorphen- diagram. Forensic Sci Int 120:32–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00413-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson GS (2000) Minimum and maximum development rates of some forensically important Calliphoridae (Diptera). J Forensic Sci 45:824–832.  https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14778J CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Villet MH (2007) An inexpensive geometrical micrometer for measuring small, live insects quickly without harming them. Entomol Exp Appl 122:279–280.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00520.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donovan SE, Hall MJR, Turner BD, Moncrieff CB (2006) Larval growth rates of the blowfly, Calliphora vicina, over a range of temperatures. Med Vet Entomol 20:106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00600.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baqué M, Filmann N, Verhoff MA, Amendt J (2015) Establishment of developmental charts for the larvae of the blow fly Calliphora vicina using quantile regression. Forensic Sci Int 248:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.12.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bugelli V, Campobasso CP, Verhoff MA, Amendt J (2017) Effects of different storage and measuring methods on larval length values for the blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Lucilia sericata and Calliphora vicina. Sci Justice 57:159–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosilawati R, Baharudin O, Syamsa RA, Lee HL, Nazni WA (2014) Effects of preservatives and killing methods on morphological features of a forensic fly, Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794) larva. Trop Biomed 31:785–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Greenberg B (1991) Flies as forensic indicators. J Med Entomol 28:565–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown K, Thorne A, Harvey M (2012) Preservation of Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) pupae for use in post-mortem interval estimation. Forensic Sci Int 223:176–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richards CS, Rowlinson CC, Hall MJ (2013) Effects of storage temperature on the change in size of Calliphora vicina larvae during preservation in 80% ethanol. Int J Legal Med 127:231–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0683-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Midgley JM, Villet MH (2009) Effect of the killing method on post-mortem change in length of larvae of Thanatophilus micans (Fabricius 1794) (Coleoptera: Silphidae) stored in 70% ethanol. Int J Legal Med 123:103–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0260-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tantawi TI, Greenberg B (1993) The effect of killing and preservative solutions on estimates of maggot age in forensic cases. J Forensic Sci 38:702–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Day DM, Wallman JF (2008) Effect of preservative solutions on preservation of Calliphora augur and Lucilia cuprina larvae (Diptera: Calliphoridae) with implications for post-mortem interval estimates. Forensic Sci Int 179:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adams ZJO, Hall MJR (2003) Methods used for the killing and preservation of blowfly larvae, and their effect on post-mortem larval length. Forensic Science Int 138:50–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marchenko MI (2001) Medicolegal relevance of cadaver entomofauna for the determination of the time of death. Forensic Sci Int 120:89–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pinilla YT, Moreno-Pérez DA, Patarroyo MA, Bello FJ (2013) Proteolytic activity regarding Sarconesiopsis magellanica (Diptera: Calliphoridae) larval excretions and secretions. Acta Trop 128:686–691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.09.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cepeda-Palacios R, Avila A, Ramırez-Orduna R, Dorchies P (1999) Estimation of the growth patterns of Oestrus ovis L. larvae hosted by goats in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Vet Parasitol 86:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00107-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medicine and Health Sciences (DiMeS)University of MoliseCampobassoItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Legal Medicine, Department of BiologyGoethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  3. 3.Department of Experimental MedicineUniversity “L. Vanvitelli” of CampaniaNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations