Advertisement

International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 133, Issue 3, pp 963–971 | Cite as

Forensic 3D documentation of skin injuries using photogrammetry: photographs vs video and manual vs automatic measurements

  • Mitchell J. FliesEmail author
  • Peter K. Larsen
  • Niels Lynnerup
  • Chiara Villa
Method Paper

Abstract

Accurate and precise documentation of lesions is an important aspect of the forensic pathologists’ work. Photogrammetry provides a useful tool to take precise measurements from photographs. These photographs are normally acquired with single camera photographs, but the procedure is quite time-consuming. Video recording has the potential to record a larger amount of image data faster. We documented 33 cadaveric skin lesions, using photographs and video recordings. The dimensions of the lesions ranged between 0.27 and 21.8 cm. The measurements of the lesions were extracted with both manual and automatic point measurements from photographs and from video frames, respectively. Very small differences (mean and median < 1 mm) were found between measurements taken in photographs versus video frames. Video frames were often blurred, preventing clear demarcation of the edges of the lesions and presenting a larger amount of noise in the 3D models. The differences between the manual point and automatic point measurements were very small (mean and median < 1 mm), but the manual procedure is to be preferred, since automatic points were not always located on the edges of the lesions. The only aspect in which video frames were superior to photographs was the recording time: video recording was almost five times faster than the photo sessions. In conclusion, this study shows that precise and comparable measurements can be extracted both from photographs and video frames. The video is the fastest method, but the use of photographs is still recommended. Manual measurements are more precise than automatic measurements and equally time-consuming.

Keywords

3D documentation Video documentation Photogrammetry Skin injuries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the forensic pathologists and technicians at the Department of Forensic Medicine for their patience and help during the documentation. We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions and comments.

Funding

MJF was supported by Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF15OC0017818]. CV was supported by Rådet for Offerfonden (J. nr. 16-910-00034).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

No formal ethical consent was needed from Danish Ethical for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Zancajo-Blazquez S, Gonzalez-Aquilera D, Gonzalez-Jorge H, Hernandez-Lopez D (2005) An automatic image-based modelling method applied to forensic Infography. PLoS One 10(3):e0119819.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buck U, Buße K, Campana L, Schyma C (2017) Validation and evaluation of measuring methods for the 3D documentation of external injuries in the field of forensic medicine. Int J Legal Med 132:551–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1756-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thali MJ, Braun M, Bruschweiler W, Dirnhofer R (2000) Matching tire tracks on the head using forensic photogrammetry. Forensic Sci Int 113:281–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00234-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slot L, Larsen PK, Lynnerup N (2014) Photogrammetric documentation of regions of interest at autopsy – a pilot study. J Forensic Sci 59(1):226–230.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12289 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Urbanová P, Hejna P, Jurda M (2015) Testing photogrammetry-based techniques for three-dimensional surface documentation in forensic pathology. Forensic Sci Int 250:77–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.03.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Villa C (2016) 3D documentation of skin injuries. Int J Legal Med 131:751–759.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1499-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kottner S, Ebert LC, Ampanozi G, Braun M, Thali M, Gascho D (2017) Virtoscan – a mobile low cost photogrammetry setup for fast post-mortem 3D full-body documentations in x-ray computed tomography and autopsy suites. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 13:34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-016-9837-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leipner A, Baumeister R, Thali MJ, Braun M, Dobler E, Ebert LC (2016) Multi-camera system for 3D forensic documentation. Forensic Sci Int 261:123–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kottner S, Ebert LC, Ampanozi G, Braun M, Thali MJ, Gascho D (2016) A Mobile, multi-camera setup for 3D full body imaging in combination with post-mortem computed tomography procedures. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, Lugano.  https://doi.org/10.15221/16.053
  10. 10.
    Pollefeys M, Nister D, Frahm JM, Akbarzadeh A, Mordohai P, Clipp B, Engels C, Gallup D, Kim SJ, Merrel P, Salmi C, Sinha S, Talton B, Wang L, Yang Q, Stewénius H, Yang R, Welch G, Twloes H (2008) Detailed real-time urban 3D reconstruction from video. Int J Comput Vis 78(2):143–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larsen P. K, Hansen, L, Simonsen E. B, Lynnerup N, (2008), Variability of Bodily Measurements of Normally Dressed People Using Photomodeler® Pro 5, J Forensic Sci 53(6).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00874.x
  12. 12.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085–1087CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Campana L, Breitbeck R, Bauer-Kreuz R, Buck U (2016) 3D documentation and visualization of external injury findings by integration of simple photography in CT/MRI data sets (IprojeCT). Int J Legal Med 130(3):787–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thali MJ, Braun M, Buck U, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, Vock P, Sonnenschein M, Dirnhofer R (2005) VIRTOPSY - scientific documentation, reconstruction and animation in forensic: individual and real 3D data based geo-metric approach including optical body/object surface and radiological CT/MRI scanning. J Forensic Sci 50:428–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villa C, Flies MJ, Jacobsen C (2017), Forensic 3D documentation of bodies: Simple and fast procedure for combining CT scanning with external photogrammetry data.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2017.11.003
  16. 16.
    Urschler M, Höller J, Bornik A, Paul T, Giretzlehner M, Bischof H, Yen K, Scheurer E (2014) Intuitive presentation of clinical forensic data using anonymous and person-specific 3D reference manikins. Forensic Sci Int 241(2014):155–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.05.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations