Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rearward movement of the slide in semi-automatic pistols: a factor potentially influencing the configuration of muzzle imprint marks in contact shots

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A muzzle imprint mark is a highly diagnostic finding, which indicates a contact shot. In many cases, it also provides additional information on the type of the weapon used and on the way in which it was held at the time of firing. In semi-automatic pistols, some constructional elements constituting the muzzle plane move to the rear together with the slide, which may prevent them from causing a corresponding imprint close to the bullet entrance hole. The present study comprises 30 consecutive autopsy cases of fatal contact shots to the head inflicted with semi-automatic pistols. The imprint marks accompanying the entrance wounds were compared with the muzzle ends of the respective weapons both before and after retracting the slide. It turned out that in a considerable number of cases (3 out of 30), the retractable parts were not depicted or only to a minor degree as components of the imprint mark. In order to validate the presumed correlation, experimental shots were fired to composite models using pistols in which the movable and the stationary parts forming the muzzle plane were dyed with different paints. Thus, it could be demonstrated that the muzzle imprint preferentially mirrors the front sides of the stationary parts such as the barrel end, the recoil guide, and the gun housing. Immediately after discharge, the slide and the ballooning skin of the bullet entrance site move in the same direction. The stationary parts of the weapon block the expansion of the skin bulging towards the muzzle, so that the skin gets firmly pressed against them. The dynamic interaction between the gun and the entrance region resulting in a characteristic imprint mark could be visualized by the use of a high-speed motion camera recording test shots to different composite models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geserick G, Vendura K, Wirth I (2009) Werkgartner’s muzzle imprint mark – a literature study. Arch Kriminol 224:145–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pollak S, Saukko P (2013) Gunshot wounds. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic sciences, vol 3, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, pp 70–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Werkgartner A (1924) Eigenartige Hautverletzungen durch Schüsse aus angesetzten Selbstladepistolen. Beitr Gerichtl Med 6:148–161

    Google Scholar 

  4. Werkgartner A (1928) Schürfungs- und Stanzverletzungen der Haut am Einschuss durch die Mündung der Waffe. Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med 11:154–168

    Google Scholar 

  5. Medinger P, Molitor L (1933) Mord mittels einer 4,25-mm-Liliputpistole. Arch Kriminol 93:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garsche R (1935) Die Stanzmarke, ein Zeichen des absoluten Nahschusses. Arch Kriminol 97:120–153

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sellier K (1988) Schußentfernungsbestimmung, 2nd edn. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 35–42

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pollak S, Saukko P (2003) Atlas of forensic medicine. CD-ROM. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Figs 7.1.074–7.1.075

    Google Scholar 

  9. Große Perdekamp M, Nadjem H, Merkel J, Braunwarth R, Pollak S, Thierauf A (2011) Two-gun suicide by simultaneous shots to the head: interdisciplinary reconstruction on the basis of scene investigation, autopsy findings, GSR analysis and examination of firearms, bullets and cartridge cases. Int J Legal Med 125:479–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karger B (2014) Forensic ballistics: injuries from gunshots, explosives and arrows. In: Madea B (ed) Handbook of forensic medicine. Wiley, Chichester, pp 328–366

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Pircher R, Bielefeld L, Geisenberger D, Große Perdekamp M, Pollak S, Thierauf-Emberger A (2014) Muzzle imprint mark: a patterned injury which may be constituted of intradermal blood extravasations. Forensic Sci Int 244:166–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hausbrandt F (1944) Experimentelle Studie zur Entstehungsmechanik und Morphologie einiger Nahschusszeichen. Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med 38:45–76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elbel H (1958) Studien zur Entstehung der Stanzverletzung bei absoluten Nahschüssen. Med Welt 20:343–345

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Dirnhofer R, Zollinger U (2002) The dynamic development of the muzzle imprint by contact gunshot: high speed documentation utilizing the skin-skull-brain model. Forensic Sci Int 127:168–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rothschild MA (2011) Conventional forensic medicine. In: Kneubuehl BP, Coupland RM, Rothschild MA, Thali MJ (eds) Wound ballistics. Basics and applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 253–285

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rothschild MA (1999) Freiverkäufliche Schreckschusswaffen. Medizinische, rechtliche und kriminaltechnische Bewertung. Schmidt-Römhild, Lübeck, pp 145–146

  17. Spitz WU (2006) Gunshot wounds. In: Spitz WU (ed) Medicolegal investigation of death, 4th edn. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, pp 607–705

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hofmann Ev (1898) Atlas der Gerichtlichen Medizin. Lehmann, München, Fig 122

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nippe M (1921) Beiträge zur Frage nach Mord, Selbstmord oder Unfall. Vierteljahrsschr Gerichtl Med 61:204–211

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liebegott G (1948/49) Zur Entstehung der Schürfungs- und Stanzverletzungen. Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med 39:356–363

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pollak S, Reiter C (1986) CO-Hämoglobin in Gefäßbezirken abseits des Schußkanals. In: Eisenmenger W, Liebhardt E, Schuck M (eds) Medizin und Recht. Festschrift für Wolfgang Spann. Springer, Berlin, pp 261–267

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bohnert M, Zollinger U, Kneubuehl BP, Pollak S (1995) Recoil-induced rifle butt mark on the ceiling in suicidal shotgun injury. Arch Kriminol 195:85–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dodd MJ (2006) Terminal ballistics. A text and atlas of gunshot wounds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 63–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pollak S (2015) Schussverletzungen. In: Madea B (ed) Rechtsmedizin. Befunderhebung, Rekonstruktion, Begutachtung. Springer, Berlin, pp 245–262

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saukko P, Knight B (2016) Knight’s forensic pathology, 4th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 241–275

    Google Scholar 

  26. Große Perdekamp M, Braunwarth R, Pollak S (2008) Patterned imprint mark due to the folded shoulder stock: a possible finding in contact shots from submachine guns. Forensic Sci Int 178:e1–e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer H (1924) Zur Diagnostik der Schußverletzungen. Z Medizinalbeamte 37:101–113

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kramer L, Nadjem H, Glardon M, Kneubuehl BP, Pollak S, Große Perdekamp M, Pircher R (2016) A patterned abrasion caused by the impact of a cartridge case may simulate an atypical muzzle imprint mark. Int J Legal Med 130:751–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heard BJ (1997) Handbook of firearms and ballistics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  30. Di Maio VJM (1999) Gunshot wounds. Practical aspects of firearm, ballistics, and forensic techniques, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pollak S, Rothschild MA (2004) Gunshot injuries as a topic of medicolegal research in the German speaking countries from the beginning of the 20th century up to the present time. Forensic Sci Int 144:201–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rommeney G (1942) Stanzverletzungen durch Feuerwaffen. Kriminalistik 16:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brüning A, Wiethold F (1934) Die Untersuchung und Beurteilung von Selbstmörderwaffen. Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med 23:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pollak S, Saukko PJ (2009) Gunshot wounds. In: Jamieson A, Moenssons A (eds) Wiley encyclopedia of forensic science, vol 3. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1380–1401

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wietrich A (1932) Täuschende Nebenverletzung. Werkgartner’sche Stanzverletzung beim Schuß einer Walther-Pistole. Dtsch Z Ges Gerichtl Med 19:460–462

    Google Scholar 

  36. Große Perdekamp M, Glardon M, Kneubuehl BP, Bielefeld L, Nadjem H, Pollak S, Pircher R (2015) Fatal contact shot to the chest caused by the gas jet from a muzzle-loading pistol discharging only black powder and no bullet: case study and experimental simulation of the wounding effects. Int J Legal Med 129:125–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schyma C, Bauer K, Brünig J, Schwendener N, Müller R (2017) Visualization of the powder pocket and its influence on staining in firearm barrels in experimental contact shots. Int J Legal Med 131:167–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pircher R, Große Perdekamp M, Thierauf-Emberger A, Kramer L, Pollak S, Geisenberger D (2017) Wound morphology in contact shots from blank cartridge handguns: a study on composite models. Int J Legal Med 131:1333–1339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schyma C (2012) Wounding capacity of muzzle-gas pressure. Int J Legal Med 126:371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albertstraße 9, 79104, Freiburg, Germany

    Rebecca Pircher, Markus Große Perdekamp, Stefan Pollak & Dorothee Geisenberger

  2. Center of Forensic Physics and Ballistics, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Berne, Bühlstrasse 20, 3012, Berne, Switzerland

    Matthieu Glardon

Authors
  1. Rebecca Pircher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthieu Glardon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markus Große Perdekamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Pollak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dorothee Geisenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Pircher.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dedicated to Prof. Gunther Geserick on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pircher, R., Glardon, M., Perdekamp, M.G. et al. Rearward movement of the slide in semi-automatic pistols: a factor potentially influencing the configuration of muzzle imprint marks in contact shots. Int J Legal Med 133, 169–176 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1978-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1978-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation