Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Age estimation combining radiographic information of two dental and four skeletal predictors in children and subadults

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improved age estimates may result from combining different age predictors. This study aimed to validate age estimation performances combining the radiographic development of teeth, cervical vertebrae, hand and wrist bones, skull, and mandible. The sampled consisted of 256 individuals aged between 4 and 20 years. Bayes’ rule with a multivariate continuation ratio model was applied for the distribution of the dental scores. The additional age information of the skeletal variables was assessed extending the dental model separately and combining the variables. The performances of all models were quantified and compared using mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). The best performance resulted combining all variables (ME − 0.04 for F and M; MAE 0.91 for F and 0.95 for M; RMSE 1.14 for F and 1.19 for M). To improve performances and minimize radiation doses, the combination of teeth and hand and wrist bones information is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gustafson G (1995) Age determinations on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 41:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moorrees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr (1963) Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res 42:1490–1502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45:211–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Köhler S, Schmelzle R, Loitz C, Püschel K (1994) Development of wisdom teeth as a criterion of age determination. Ann Anat 176:339–345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Willems G (2001) A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol 19:9–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. AlQahtani SJ, Hector MP, Liversidge HM (2010) Brief communication: the London atlas of human tooth development and eruption. Am J Phys Anthropol 142:481–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Melsen B, Wenzel A, Miletic T, Andreasen J, Vagn-Hansen PL, Terp S (1986) Dental and skeletal maturity in adoptive children: assessments at arrival and after one year in the admitting country. Ann Hum Biol 13:153–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfau RO, Sciulli PW (1994) A method for establishing the age of subadults. J Forensic Sci 39:165–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassel B, Farman AG (1995) Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 107:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70157-5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kullman L (1995) Accuracy of two dental and one skeletal age estimation method in Swedish adolescents. Forensic Sci Int 75:225–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nortjè CJ, Harris AMP (1986) Maxillo-facial radiology in forensic dentistry: a review. J Forensic Odont-Stomatol 4:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Collins MJ, Waite ER, Schútz HW, Kaatsch HJ et al (2000) Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practice. Int J Legal Med 113:129–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmeling A, Geserick G, Reisinger W, Olze A (2007) Age estimation. Forensic Sci Int 165:178–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.016

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B, Carels C (2001) Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian’s technique revisited. J Forensic Sci 46:893–895

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Franco A, Thevissen P, Fieuws S, Souza PHC, Willems G (2013) Applicability of Willems model for dental age estimation in Brazilian children. Forensic Sci Int 231:401.e1–401.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.05.030

    Google Scholar 

  17. Altalie S, Thevissen P, Fieuws S, Willems G (2014) Optimal dental age estimation practice in united Arabic emirates’ children. J Forensic Sci 59:383–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frítola M, Fujikawa AS, Ferreira FM, Franco A, Fernandes A (2015) Dental age estimation of Brazilian children comparing Demirjian’s and Willems’ methods. Rev Bras Odont Legal 2:26–34. https://doi.org/10.21117/rbol.v2i1.18

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yusof MY, Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G (2014) Dental age estimation in Malay children based on all permanent teeth types. Int J Legal Med 128:329–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0825-8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G (2010) Human dental age estimation using third molar developmental stages: does a Bayesian approach outperform regression models to discriminate between juveniles and adults? Int J Legal Med 124:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0329-8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G (2011) Human third molar development: measurements versus scores as age predictor. Arch Oral Biol 56:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.04.008

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G (2013) Third molar development: evaluation of nine tooth development registration techniques for age estimation. J Forensic Sci 58:393–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilli G (1996) The assessment of skeletal maturation. Horm Res 45(Suppl 2):49–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanner JM (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method), 3rd edn. WB Saunders, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Thissen D (1988) Assessing the skeletal maturity of the hand-wrist: FELS method. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  26. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J (2005) The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 11:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seedat AK, Forsberg CD (2005) An evaluation of the third cervical vertebra (C3) as a growth indicator in black subjects. SADJ 60:156,158–156,160

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nanda R, Snodell SF, Bollu P (2012) Transverse growth of maxilla and mandible. Semin Orthod 18:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2011.10.007

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thevissen PW, Kaur J, Willems G (2012) Human age estimation combining third molar and skeletal development. Int J Legal Med 126:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0639-5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cameriere R, Luca SD, Biagi R, Cingolani M, Farronato G, Ferrante L (2012) Accuracy of three age estimation methods in children by measurements of developing teeth and carpals and epiphyses of the ulna and radius. J Forensic Sci 57:1263–1270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02120.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thevissen PW, Kvaal SI (2012) Ethics in age estimation of unaccompanied minor. J Forensic Odontostomatol 30:84–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Boldsen JL, Milner GR, Konigsberg LW, Wood JW (2002) Transition analysis: a new method for estimating age from skeletons. In: Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW (eds) Paleodemography: age distributions from skeletal samples. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73–106

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fieuws S, Willems G, Larsen-Tangmose S, Lynnerup N, Boldsen J, Thevissen P (2016) Obtaining appropriate interval estimates for age when multiple indicators are used: evaluation of an ad-hoc procedure. Int J Legal Med 130:489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1200-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs (2006) The use of dental radiographs: updates and recommendations. JADA 137:1304–1312

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thevissen P, Kvaal SI, Willems G (2012) Ethics in age estimation of unaccompanied minors. J Forensic Odontostomatol 30:84–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmidt S, Henke CA, Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Bajanowski T, Ramsthaler F, Püschel K, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A, Schulz R (2016) Optimising resonance magnetic imaging-based evaluation of the ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis: a multi-centre study. Int J Legal Med 130:1615–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1442-0

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hillewig E, Degroote J, Van der Paelt T, Visscher A, Vandemaele P, Lutin B et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging of the external extremity of the clavicle in forensic age estimation: towards more sound age estimates. Int J Legal Med 127:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0798-z

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Timme M, Ottow C, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H, Heindel W, Vieth V, Schmeling A, Schmidt S (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis: a new criterion of maturity for determining whether the age of 18 has been completed? Int J Legal Med 131:579–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1502-5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Urschler M, Krauskopf A, Widek T, Sorantin E, Ehammer T, Borkenstein M, Yen K, Scheurer E (2016) Applicability of Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse grading methods to MRI when assessing hand bone age in forensic age estimation: a pilot study. Forensic Sci Int 266:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.016

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Serin J, Rérolle C, Pucheux J, Dedouit F, Telmon N, Savall F, Saint-Martin P (2016) Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist and hand to forensic age assessment. Int J Legal Med 130:1121–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1362-z

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Serinelli S, Panebianco V, Martino M, Battisti S, Rodacki K, Marinelli E, Zaccagna F, Semelka RC, Tomei E (2015) Accuracy of MRI skeletal age estimation for subjects 12-19. Potential use for subjects of unknown age. Int J Legal Med 129:609–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1161-y

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. de Tobel J, Hillewig E, Bogaert S, Deblaere K, Verstraete K (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of third molars: developing a protocol suitable for forensic age estimation. Ann Hum Biol 44:130–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1161-y

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. de Tobel J, Hillewig E, Verstraete K (2017) Forensic age estimation based on magnetic resonance imaging of third molars converting 2D staging into 3D staging. Ann Hum Biol 44:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2016.1223884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. de Tobel J, Phlypo I, Fieuws S, Politis C, Koenraad L, Verstraete et al (2017) Forensic age estimation based on development of third molars: a staging technique for magnetic resonance imaging. J Forensic Odontostomatol 35:125–146

    Google Scholar 

  45. Degalp R, Aka PS, Canturk N, Kedici I (2014) Age estimation from fetus and infant tooth and head measurements. Int J Legal Med 128:501–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0935-3

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shi L, Jiang F, Ouyang F, Zhang J, Wang Z, Shen X (2018) DNA methylation markers in combination with skeletal and dental ages to improve age estimation in children. Forensic Sci Int Genet 33:1–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bassed RB, Briggs C, Drummer OH (2011) Age estimation using CT images of the third molar tooth, the medial clavicular epiphysis, and the spheno-occipital synchondrosis: a multifactorial approach. Forensic Sci Int 273:e1–273.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.007

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Thevissen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval was provided by the Ethical Committee of the School of Dentistry at Iwate Medical University under reference no. 01237 according to the Declaration of Helsinki regarding human experimentation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumagai, A., Willems, G., Franco, A. et al. Age estimation combining radiographic information of two dental and four skeletal predictors in children and subadults. Int J Legal Med 132, 1769–1777 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1910-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1910-9

Keywords

Navigation