Detection of painted-over traces of blood and seminal fluid
Dealing with a refurbished crime scene is a special challenge for forensic investigators. In such cases, a crime scene may not have only been cleaned in order to erase all traces but the walls of an indoor crime scene could also be painted over in order to mask traces of the crime. So far, very few publications have shown that painted-over traces of blood and seminal fluid can be detected using a forensic light source or infrared photography. To date, there have been no systematically executed research studies including guidelines on which settings to use depending on the color of the wall. Moreover, no comparative study has addressed the question of whether it is better to use infrared photography or a forensic light source to visualize painted-over bloodstains. The present study covers the aforementioned gaps and shows that painted-over bloodstains are most easily visualized by infrared photography, while traces of seminal fluid are most easily visualized at 440 nm in combination with a yellow filter—both independent of the color of the wall paint.
KeywordsForensic photography Forensic light source Alternative light source (ALS) Cleaned crime scene Blood Semen Infrared photography Paint
We thank Corinne Moser for the technical assistance with the genetic analyses and presumptive tests.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Baskin DR, Sommers IB (2010) Crime-show-viewing habits and public attitudes toward forensic evidence: the “CSI effect” revisited. Justice Syst J 31:97–113Google Scholar
- 4.Bily C, Maldonado H (2006) The application of Luminol to bloodstains concealed by multiple layers of paint. J For Ident 56:896–905Google Scholar
- 5.Pettolina M, Rainey J, Sanchez R (2017) Using Bluestar forensic to detect latent bloodstains under coats of paint. J For Ident 67:341–353Google Scholar
- 6.Howard MC, Nessan M (2010) Detecting bloodstains under multiple layers of paint. J For Ident 60:682–717Google Scholar
- 8.Adair TW (2006) Experimental detection of blood under painted surfaces. In: International Association of Bloodstain Pattern Analysts I.A.B.P.A. News 22(1):12–19Google Scholar
- 9.Ray B (1992) Use of alternative light sources for detection of body fluids. SWAFS J 14:30–33Google Scholar
- 11.Sterzik V, Bohnert M (2015) Bloodstain pattern analysis by infrared photography. In: 19th Nordic Congress on Forensic Medicine & 1st Annual Meeting of NAFT. S J F S, Stockholm. p 35Google Scholar
- 15.Kind SS (1965) The acid phosphatase-test. In: Curry AF (ed) Methods of forensic science, 3rd edn. Interscience Publisher, London, pp 267–288Google Scholar
- 21.Soderquist TJ, Chesniak OM, Witt MR, Paramo A, Keeling VA, Keleher JJ (2012) Evaluation of the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 through use of organo-metallic complexes—a potential link to the Luminol presumptive blood test. Forensic Sci Int 219(1-3):101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.12.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar