Accuracy of the third molar maturity index in assessing the legal age of 18 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The age estimation is a complex procedure required in the daily practice of legal medicine. The maturity of third molars stands out by the age of 18 because these teeth are still in development. This systematic review aimed to assess the accuracy of the third molar maturity index (I 3M), proposed by Cameriere et al. (2008), in discriminating whether an individual is under or over 18 years. Seven electronic databases were screened: PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, SIGLE, and CAPES. Eligible studies included an assessment of I 3M accuracy at the 0.08 cut-off value. The quality assessment was performed by using QUADAS 2. Three meta-analyses (MA) were accomplished: overall, one for males and another for females. From 2397 articles identified, 16 met the eligibility criteria. Of these, two showed high risk of bias, one in the reference standard domain and the other in the flow and timing domain. The percentage of individuals correctly classified ranged from 72.4 to 96.0%. The overall MA showed pooled sensitivity of 0.86 (0.84 to 0.87; p = 0.0000) and pooled specificity of 0.93 (0.92 to 0.94; p = 0.0000). The AUC (area under the summary receiver operator characteristics curve) and DOR (diagnostic odds ratio) values were, respectively, 0.9652 and 104.68, indicating an overall high discrimination effect. Separately, better results of accuracy were found for males. High heterogeneity was achieved for both sensibility (94.6%) and specificity (88.8%). We conclude that the I 3M is a suitable and useful method for estimating adulthood regarding forensic purposes, regardless of gender.
KeywordsAge determination by teeth Forensic dentistry Legal age Third molar Systematic review
The authors of this study would like to thank the following authors who kindly provided information not available in their full texts: Alexandre Raphael Deitos and Stefano De Luca.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 9.ICC-CPI (2014) Understanding the International Criminal Court. 49Google Scholar
- 16.Nicodemo RA, Moraes LC, Médici Filho E (1974) Chronological table of mineralization of permanent teeth among Brazilians. Rev da Fac Odontol São José dos Campos 3:55–56Google Scholar
- 19.Cameriere R, Ferrante L, De Angelis D, Scarpino F, Galli F (2008) The comparison between measurement of open apices of third molars and Demirjian stages to test chronological age of over 18 year olds in living subjects. Int J Legal Med 122(6):493–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0279-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Cameriere R, Santoro V, Roca R, Lozito P, Introna F, Cingolani M, Galić I, Ferrante L (2014) Assessment of legal adult age of 18 by measurement of open apices of the third molars: study on the Albanian sample. Forensic Sci Int 245c:205.e1–205.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Maia LC, Antonio AG (2012) Systematic reviews in dental research. A guideline. J Clin Pediatr Dent 37(2):117–124. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.37.2.h606137vj3826v61 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The evidence-based medicine working group. J Am Med Assoc 271(9):703–707. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510330081039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Bossuyt PM, Davenport C, Deeks J, et al (2013) Chapter 11 interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test version 0.9 accuracy. pp 1–31. Available from: http://srdta.cochrane.org/
- 32.Martins HM (2015) "Avaliação da idade cronológica em adolescentes e adultos jovens por meio da abertura do ápice dentário". Dissertation, University of CampinasGoogle Scholar
- 36.De Luca S, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Polimeni A, Fischetto SG, Velandia Palacio LA, Vanin S, Cameriere R (2016) Third molar development by measurements of open apices in an Italian sample of living subjects. J Forensic Legal Med 38:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Timme M, Timme WH, Olze A, Ottow C, Ribbecke S, Pfeiffer H, Dettmeyer R, Schmeling A (2017) Dental age estimation in the living after completion of third molar mineralization: new data for Gustafson’s criteria. Int J Legal Med 131(2):569–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1492-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343(oct18 2):d5928–d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 52.Bajpai M, Pardhe N, Kumar M, Agrawal SA Comparative evaluation of Gustafson’s formula and new formula for age estimation in India—a forensic study. Prague Med Rep 116:203–209Google Scholar