Comparative tolerance of two massively parallel sequencing systems to common PCR inhibitors
- 212 Downloads
Human remains can be severely affected by the environment, and the DNA may be damaged, degraded, and/or inhibited. In this study, a DNA sample (at 1 ng DNA target input in triplicate) was spiked with five concentrations of five inhibitors (humic acid, melanin, hematin, collagen, and calcium) and sequenced with both the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit and ID panel on the Ion PGM™ System and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the MiSeq FGx™. The objective of this study was to compare the baseline tolerance of the two sequencing chemistries and platforms to common inhibitors encountered in human remains recovered from missing person cases. The two chemistries generally were comparable but not always susceptible to the same inhibitors or at the same capacity. The HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit and ID panel and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit both were susceptible to humic acid, melanin, and collagen; however, the ForenSeq kit showed greater inhibition to melanin and collagen than the AmpliSeq™ kit. In contrast, the ForenSeq kit was resistant to the effects of hematin and calcium, whereas the AmpliSeq™ kit was highly inhibited by hematin. Short tandem repeats (STRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showed the same trend among inhibitors when using the ForenSeq kit. Generally, locus read depth, heterozygote allele balance, and the numbers of alleles typed were inversely correlated with increasing inhibitor concentration. The larger STR loci were affected more so by the presence of inhibitors compared to smaller STR amplicons and SNP loci. Additionally, it does not appear that sequence noise is affected by the inhibitors. The noise percentage, however, does increase as the inhibitor concentration increases, due to the decrease in locus read depth and not likely because of chemistry effects.
KeywordsHID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit STR SNP PCR inhibitors Noise
The authors would like to thank the individuals who provided the biological sample used in this study.
This project was supported in full by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Award Number 2015-DN-BX-K066 awarded to Sam Houston State University (SHSU) and the University of North Texas Health Science Center (UNTHSC).
- 1.Ritter N (2007) Missing persons and unidentified remains: the nation’s silent mass disaster. NIJ Journal 256:2–7Google Scholar
- 4.Barbisin M, Fang R, O’Shea CE, Calandro LM, Furtado MR, Shewale JG (2009) Developmental validation of the Quantifiler® duo DNA quantification kit for simultaneous quantification of total human and human male DNA and detection of PCR inhibitors in biological samples. J Forensic Sci 54:305–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Oostdik K, Lenz K, Nye J, Schelling K, Yet D, Bruski S, Strong J, Buchanan C, Sutton J, Linner J, Frazier N, Young H, Matthies L, Sage A, Hahn J, Wells R, Williams N, Price M, Koehler J, Staples M, Swango KL, Hill C, Oyerly K, Duke W, Katzilierakis L, Ensenberger MG, Bourdeau JM, Sprecher CJ, Krenke B, Storts DR (2014) Developmental validation of the PowerPlex((R)) fusion system for analysis of casework and reference samples: a 24-locus multiplex for new database standards. For Sci Int Genet 12:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sanchez JJ, Phillips C, Børsting C, Balogh K, Bogus M, Fondevila M, Harrison CD, Musgrave-Brown E, Salas A, Syndercombe-Court D, Schneider PM, Carracedo A, Morling N (2006) A multiplex assay with 52 single nucleotide polymorphisms for human identification. Electrophoresis 27:1713–1724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kidd KK, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Grigorenko EL, Kajuna SL, Karoma NJ, Kungulilo S, Kim JJ, Lu RB, Odunsi A, Okonofua F, Parnas J, Schulz LO, Zhukova OV, Kidd JR (2006) Developing a SNP panel for forensic identification of individuals. For Sci Int Genet 164:20–32Google Scholar
- 16.Yang N, Li H, Criswell LA, Gregersen PK, Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Kittles R, Shigeta R, Silva G, Patel PI, Belmont JW, Seldin MF (2005) Examination of ancestry and ethnic affiliation using highly informative diallelic DNA markers: application to diverse and admixed populations and implications for clinical epidemiology and forensic medicine. Hum Genet 118:382–392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Fordyce SL, Avila-Arcos MC, Rockenbauer E, Borsting C, Frank-Hansen R, Petersen FT, Willerslev E, Hansen AJ, Morling N, Gilbert MT (2011) High-throughput sequencing of core STR loci for forensic genetic investigations using the Roche Genome Sequencer FLX platform. BioTechniques 51:127–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Eduardoff M, Santos C, de la Puente M, Gross M, Strobl C, Sobrino B, Ballard D, Schneider PM, Carracedo Á, Lareu MV, Parson W, Phillips C (2015) Inter-laboratory evaluation of SNP-based forensic identification by massively parallel sequencing using the Ion PGM. For Sci Int Genet 17:110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Ion AmpliSeq™ library preparation for human identification applications (2015) https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/MAN0010640_AmpliSeqLibraryPrep_HID_UG.pdf
- 38.ForenSeq™ DNA signature prep reference guide (2015) https://support.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-support/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/forenseq/forenseq-dna-signature-prep-guide-15049528-01.pdf
- 42.Core Team R (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 43.Jäger AC, Alvarez ML, Davis CP, Guzmán E, Han Y, Way L, Walichiewicz P, Silva D, Pham N, Caves G, Bruand J, Schlesinger F, Pond SJ, Varlaro J, Stephens KM, Holt CL (2017) Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx forensic genomics system for targeted next generation sequencing in forensic DNA casework and database laboratories. For Sci Int Genet 28:52–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar