Advertisement

International Journal of Legal Medicine

, Volume 129, Issue 5, pp 1183–1186 | Cite as

Sexual dimorphism of the lateral angle of the internal auditory canal and its potential for sex estimation of burned human skeletal remains

  • David GonçalvesEmail author
  • Tim J. U. Thompson
  • Eugénia Cunha
Short Communication

Abstract

The potential of the petrous bone for sex estimation has been recurrently investigated in the past because it is very resilient and therefore tends to preserve rather well. The sexual dimorphism of the lateral angle of the internal auditory canal was investigated in two samples of cremated Portuguese individuals in order to assess its usefulness for sex estimation in burned remains. These comprised the cremated petrous bones from fleshed cadavers (N = 54) and from dry and disarticulated bones (N = 36). Although differences between males and females were more patent in the sample of skeletons, none presented a very significant sexual dimorphism, thus precluding any attempt of sex estimation. This may have been the result of a difficult application of the method and of a differential impact of heat-induced warping which is known to be less frequent in cremains from dry skeletons. Results suggest that the lateral angle method cannot be applied to burned human skeletal remains

Keywords

Forensic anthropology Biological anthropology Burned bones Internal auditory canal Heat-induced changes Biological profile 

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson TJU (2004) Recent advances in the study of burned bone and their implications for forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int 146S:S203–S205. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schutkowski H (1983) Uber den diagnostischen Wert der Pars petrosa ossis temporalis fur die Geschlechtsbestimmung. Z Morph Anthropol 74:129–144Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holck P (1986) Cremated bones: a medical-anthropological study of an archaeological material on cremation burials. Antropologiske Skrifter. Anatomisk Institutt Universitetet, OsloGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wahl J, Graw M (2001) Metric sex differentiation of the pars petrosa ossis temporalis. Int J Legal Med 114:215–223. doi: 10.1007/s004140000167 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norén A, Lynnerup N, Czarneztki A, Graw M (2005) Lateral angle: a method for sexing using the petrous bone. Am J Phys Anthropol 128:318–323. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20245 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Masotti S, Succi-Leonelli E, Gualdi-Russo E (2013) Cremated human remains: is measurement of the lateral angle of the meatus acusticus internus a reliable method of sex determination? Int J Legal Med 127(5):1039–1044. doi: 10.1007/s00414-013-0822-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gonçalves D, Cunha E, Thompson TJU (2014) Estimation of the pre-burning condition of human remains in forensic contexts. Int J Legal Med. doi: 10.1007/s00414-014-1027-8 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graw M, Ahlbrecht M, Wahl J (2005) Course of the meatus acusticus internus as criterion for sex differentiation. Forensic Sci Int 147:113–117. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.08.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graw M, Schultz M, Wahl J (2003) A simple morphological method for gender determination at the petrous portion of the os temporalis. Forensic Sci Int 136(1):165–166Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gonçalves D, Campanacho V, Cardoso HFV (2011) Reliability of the lateral angle of the internal auditory canal for sex determination of subadult skeletal remains. J Forensic Leg Med 18:121–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2011.01.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ulijaszek SJ, Lourie JA (1994) Intra- and inter-observer error in anthropometric measurement. In: Ulijaszek SJ, Mascie-Taylor CGN (eds) Anthropometry: the individual and the population. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 30–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morgan J, Lynnerup N, Hoppa RD (2013) The lateral angle revisited: a validation study of the reliability of the lateral angle method for sex determination using computed tomography (CT). J Forensic Sci 58(2):443–447. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12090 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akansel G, Inan N, Kurtas O, Sarisoy HT, Arslan A, Demirci A (2008) Gender and the lateral angle of the internal acoustic canal meatus as measured on computerized tomography of the temporal bone. Forensic Sci Int 178:93–95. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.02.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lynnerup N, Schultz M, Madelung A, Graw M (2005) Diameter of the human internal acoustic meatus and sex determination. Int J Osteoarch 16:118–123. doi: 10.1002/oa.811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osipov B, Harvati K, Nathena D, Spanakis K, Karantanas A, Kranioti EF (2013) Sexual dimorphism of the bony labyrinth: a new age-independent method. Am J Phys Anthropol 151(2):290–301. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22279 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Gonçalves
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Tim J. U. Thompson
    • 4
  • Eugénia Cunha
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Centre for Anthropology and Health (CIAS)University of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology of the Department of Life SciencesUniversity of Coimbra/Forensic Sciences Centre (CENCIFOR)CoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.Laboratório de ArqueociênciasDirecção Geral do Património Cultural and LARC/CIBIO/InBIOLisboaPortugal
  4. 4.School of Science & EngineeringTeesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations