The comparative performance of PMI estimation in skeletal remains by three methods (C-14, luminol test and OHI): analysis of 20 cases
- 469 Downloads
When estimating post-mortem interval (PMI) in forensic anthropology, the only method able to give an unambiguous result is the analysis of C-14, although the procedure is expensive. Other methods, such as luminol tests and histological analysis, can be performed as preliminary investigations and may allow the operators to gain a preliminary indication concerning PMI, but they lack scientific verification, although luminol testing has been somewhat more accredited in the past few years. Such methods in fact may provide some help as they are inexpensive and can give a fast response, especially in the phase of preliminary investigations. In this study, 20 court cases of human skeletonized remains were dated by the C-14 method. For two cases, results were chronologically set after the 1950s; for one case, the analysis was not possible technically. The remaining 17 cases showed an archaeological or historical collocation. The same bone samples were also screened with histological examination and with the luminol test. Results showed that only four cases gave a positivity to luminol and a high Oxford Histology Index (OHI) score at the same time: among these, two cases were dated as recent by the radiocarbon analysis. Thus, only two false-positive results were given by the combination of these methods and no false negatives. Thus, the combination of two qualitative methods (luminol test and microscopic analysis) may represent a promising solution to cases where many fragments need to be quickly tested.
KeywordsForensic anthropology PMI Radiocarbon Luminol test OHI Tunnelling
The authors declare that the present study comply with the current Italian laws.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Cook SF (1968) Dating prehistoric bone by chemical analysis. In: Heizer R, Cook SF (eds) The application of quantitative methods in archaeology. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, Chicago, pp 223–245Google Scholar
- 9.Berg S (1963) The determination of bone age. In: Landquist F (ed) Methods of forensic sciences, vol. 2. Interscience, pp 231-252.Google Scholar
- 20.Ubelaker DH, Buchholz BA (2006) Complexities in the use of bomb-curve radiocarbon to determine time since death of human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Commun 8(2):1–9Google Scholar
- 23.Hoke N, Grigat A, Grupe G, Harbeck M (2013) Reconsideration of bone post-mortem interval estimation by UV-induced auto-fluorescence. Forensic Sci Int 228(1-3)176.e1-e6Google Scholar
- 36.Weber K (1966) Die Anwendung der Chemilumineszenz des Luminols in der gerichtlichen Medizin und Toxikologie. Deutsch Zeitschr Gesamtegerichtl Med 57(3):410–423Google Scholar
- 37.Calcagnile L, Quarta G, Cattaneo C, D’Elia M (2013) Determination of the radiocarbon content in different human tissues: implications for the application of the 14c bomb spike dating in Forensic Medicine, Radiocarbon, University of Arizona, Vol. 55 Nr. 2-3, 1845-1849Google Scholar
- 38.Quarta G, Butalag K, Calcagnile L, D'Elia M, Arthur P, Tinelli M, Caramia A, (2008) IBA analyses of major and trace elements of AMS 14C dated bones from two medieval sites in Italy, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B Vol. 266 pp. 2343-2347Google Scholar
- 40.Haynes CV (1967) Bone organic matter and radiocarbon dating in radiocarbon dating and methods of low level counting. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 163–168Google Scholar