Abstract
The assessment of age at death for identification purposes is a frequent and tough challenge for forensic pathologists and anthropologists. Too frequently, visual assessment of age is performed on well-preserved corpses, a method considered subjective and full of pitfalls, but whose level of inadequacy no one has yet tested or proven. This study consisted in the visual estimation of the age of 100 cadavers performed by a total of 37 observers among those usually attending the dissection room. Cadavers were of Caucasian ethnicity, well preserved, belonging to individuals who died of natural death. All the evaluations were performed prior to autopsy. Observers assessed the age with ranges of 5 and 10 years, indicating also the body part they mainly observed for each case.
Globally, the 5-year range had an accuracy of 35 %, increasing to 69 % with the 10-year range. The highest accuracy was in the 31–60 age category (74.7 % with the 10-year range), and the skin seemed to be the most reliable age parameter (71.5 % of accuracy when observed), while the face was considered most frequently, in 92.4 % of cases. A simple formula with the general “mean of averages” in the range given by the observers and related standard deviations was then developed; the average values with standard deviations of 4.62 lead to age estimation with ranges of some 20 years that seem to be fairly reliable and suitable, sometimes in alignment with classic anthropological methods, in the age estimation of well-preserved corpses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baccino E, Ubelaker DH, Hayek LA, Zerilli A (1999) Evaluation of seven methods of estimating age at death from mature human skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 44:931–936
Brooks S, Suchey JM (1990) Skeletal age determination based on os pubis: a comparison of the Acsadi-Nemeskeri and Suchey-Brooks methods. Hum Evol 5:227–238
Işcan MY, Loth SR (1986) Determination of age from the sternal rib in white males: a test of the phase method. J Forensic Sci 31:122–132
Işcan MY, Loth SR (1986) Determination of age from the sternal rib in white females: a test of the phase method. J Forensic Sci 31:990–999
Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossintchouk RM, Zerilli A (1992) A simple technique for age estimation in adult corpses: the two criteria dental method. J Forensic Sci 37:1373–1379
Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Collins MJ, Waite ER, Schütz HW, Kaatsch HJ et al (2000) Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise. Int J Legal Med 113:129–136
Schmeling A, Geserick G, Reisinger W, Olze A (2007) Age estimation. Forensic Sci Int 165:178–181
Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler F, Prieto J, Schuliar Y et al (2009) The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review. Forensic Sci Int 193:1–13
Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Geserick G, Olze A. Age estimation of unaccompanied minors. Part I. General considerations. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159(Suppl 1):S61-4.
Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G (2001) Age estimation of living people undergoing criminal proceedings. Lancet 358:89–90
Cattaneo C, Ritz-Timme S, Gabriel P, Gibelli D, Giudici E, Poppa P et al (2009) The difficult issue of age assessment on pedo-pornographic material. Forensic Sci Int 183:21–24
NamUS – National missing and unidentified persons system. http://www.namus.gov/
Cattaneo C, Porta D, De Angelis D, Gibelli D, Poppa P, Grandi M (2010) Unidentified bodies and human remains: an Italian glimpse through a European problem. Forensic Sci Int 195(1–3):167.e1–167.e6
Olde Rikkert MG (1999) Visual estimation of biological age of elderly subjects: good interrater agreement. Gerontology 45:165–167
Bulpitt CJ, Markowe HL, Shipley MJ (2001) Why do some people look older than they should? Postgrad Med J 77:578–581
Gross TF (2007) Developmental changes in the perception of adult facial age. J Genet Psychol 168(4):443–464
Voelkle MC, Ebner NC, Lindenberger U, Riediger M (2012) Let me guess how old you are: effects of age, gender, and facial expression on perceptions of age. Psychol Aging 27:265–277
Chauhan N, Warner JP, Adamson PA (2012) Perceived age change after aesthetic facial surgical procedures: quantifying outcomes of aging face surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 14:258–262
Zimm AJ, Modabber M, Fernandes V, Karimi K, Adamson PA (2013) Objective assessment of perceived age reversal and improvement in attractiveness after aging face surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 15:405–410
Rexbye H, Petersen I, Iachina M, Mortensen J, McGue M, Vaupel JW et al (2005) Hair loss among elderly men: etiology and impact on perceived age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:1077–1082
Nkengne A, Bertin C, Stamatas GN, Giron A, Rossi A, Issachar N et al (2008) Influence of facial skin attributes on the perceived age of Caucasian women. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 22:982–991
Sezgin B, Findikcioglu K, Kaya B, Sibar S, Yavuzer R (2012) Mirror on the wall: a study of women’s perception of facial features as they age. Aesthet Surg J 32:421–425
Samson N, Fink B, Matts PJ (2010) Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. Int J Cosmet Sci 32:167–184
Fink B, Matts PJ, Röder S, Johnson R, Burquest M (2011) Differences in visual perception of age and attractiveness of female facial and body skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 33:126–131
Arce-Lopera C, Igarashi T, Nakao K, Okajima K (2013) Image statistics on the age perception of human skin. Skin Res Technol 19:e273–e278
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amadasi, A., Merusi, N. & Cattaneo, C. How reliable is apparent age at death on cadavers?. Int J Legal Med 129, 913–918 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1042-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1042-9