Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe: a comprehensive bibliometric overview

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In times of globalisation, the future of bio-medicolegal sciences in Europe depends on the scientific community’s ability to develop new strategies for research, to introduce new and generally accepted standards, to develop new analytical methods, all in order to draw up inter-site, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary long-term research projects, eligible for European Union (EU) funding. To analyse the scientific output and to identify the topics of greatest interest and appeal in these sciences, an innovative method has been developed to select and analyse publications. This method has been applied to analyse a total of 21,176 records from PubMed out of which 5,826 papers were suitable for further analysis because they were published in national and international journals in the time between January 1, 2005 and June 1, 2010 by European authors in the field of interest. In 69% of all manuscripts, authors presented results of systematic research (original articles); 84% of the papers were written in English language. The cumulative impact factor increased from 1,670 points in 2005 to 1,878 in 2009, and extrapolated 2,812 points in 2010. The most frequent topics were the description of new analytical methods in forensic toxicology (5.7% of all papers), the analysis of short tandem repeat systems (STR, 5.6%) as well as the analysis of injury mechanisms in forensic pathology and clinical forensic medicine (4.9%). If the impact factor related potential of different topics is calculated (ratio of frequency of papers and frequency of impact points achieved), SIDS research reaches 1.64 points, followed by studies on mtDNA (1.59) and the development of new analytical methods in forensic toxicology (1.49). The findings made in the present bibliometric analysis reveal a clear and interesting overall picture of the European scientific production and productivity and could be used to identify the most innovative research lines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferrara SD, Bajanowski T, Cecchi R, Snenghi R, Case C, Viel G (2010) Bio-medicolegal guidelines and protocols: survey and future perspectives in Europe. Int J Legal Med 124:345–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulkarni AV, Busse JW, Shams I (2007) Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature. PLoS ONE 2:e403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrara SD, Pfeiffer H (2010) Unitariness, evidence and quality in bio-medicolegal sciences. Int J Legal Med 124:343–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Madea B, Saukko P (eds) (2008) Forensic medicine in Europe. Schmidt-Römhild Verlag, Lübeck

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brinkmann B, Cecchi R, Du Chesne A (1994) Legal medicine in Europe-Quo vadis? Int J Legal Med 107:57–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Madea B, Saukko P (2007) Future in forensic medicine as an academic discipline—focussing on research. Forensic Sci Int 165:87–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pollak S (2004) Clinical forensic medicine and its main fields of activity from the foundation of the German Society of Legal Medicine until today. Forensic Sci Int 144:269–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Falagas ME, Alexiou VG (2008) An analysis of trends in globalisation of origin of research published in major general medical journals. Int J Clin Pract 62:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones AW (2007) The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor. Forensic Sci Int 165:115–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saukko P (2009) The role of international journals in legal/forensic medicine. Leg Med (Tokyo) 11(Suppl 1):S9–S12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wieland S, Dickersin K (2005) Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives. J Clin Epidemiol 58:560–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garfield E (1996) How can impact factors be improved? BMJ 313:411–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E (2002) Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA 287:2847–2850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA (2002) Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA 287:2805–2808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Suci ES, Gil-Montero M (2002) Problems with indexing and citation of articles with group authorship. JAMA 287:2772–2774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Drs. Viviana Ananian, Amelia Boscia and Chiara Verdone for their precious technical and organisational contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santo Davide Ferrara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrara, S.D., Bajanowski, T., Cecchi, R. et al. Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe: a comprehensive bibliometric overview. Int J Legal Med 125, 393–402 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0538-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0538-1

Keywords

Navigation