Skip to main content
Log in

Population studies of 16 bovine STR loci for forensic purposes

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a consequence of the close integration of cattle into the food chain of humans, forensically relevant cases involving cattle (Bos taurus) DNA analysis are common. However, scientific publications reporting the information content of the commonly used bovine short tandem repeat (STR) loci remains scarce. Population studies were performed for 16 polymorphic STR loci (BM1818, BM1824, BM2113, CSRM60, CSSM66, ETH3, ETH10, ETH225, HAUT27, ILSTS006, INRA023, SPS115, TGLA53, TGLA122, TGLA126, and TGLA227) including 4,162 randomly selected cattle representing 20 distinct breeds. The power of parental exclusion, expected and observed heterozygosity, probability of identity, and non-amplifying (“null”) allele frequencies were calculated. Major differences existed in the information content between different cattle breeds. The selection of 16 STR loci, partially recommended by International Society for Animal Genetics as the minimum standard needed for bovine STR typing, was sufficient for forensic analysis. Furthermore, the efficacy of the loci was assessed in assigning unknown individuals to the correct breed based on genotype data. The individual assignment tests provided excellent success in several breeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Adelson DL (2008) Insights and applications from sequencing the bovine genome. Reprod Fertil Dev 20:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van de Goor LHP, van Haeringen WA (2007) Identification of stolen cattle using 22 microsatellite markers. Nonhuman DNA typing, theory and casework applications. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 122–123

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bredbacka P, Koskinen MT (1999) Microsatellite panels suggested for parentage testing in cattle: informativeness revealed in Finnish Ayrshire and Holstein Friesian populations. Agri Food Sci Finland 8:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sherman GB, Kachman SD, Hungerford LL et al (2004) Impact of candidate sire number and sire relatedness on DNA polymorphism-based measures of exclusion probability and probability of unambiguous parentage. Anim Genet 35:220–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Budowle B, Garofano P, Hellman A et al (2005) Recommendations for animal DNA forensic and identity testing. Int J Legal Med 119:295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goor van de LHP, Panneman H, Haeringen van WA (2009) A proposal for standardization in forensic bovine DNA typing: allele nomenclature of 16 cattle-specific STR loci. Anim Genet (in press)

  7. Menotti-Raymond MA, David VA, Wachter LL et al (2005) An STR forensic typing system for genetic individualization of domestic cat (Felis catus) samples. J Forensic Sci 50:1061–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coomber N, David VA, O’Brien SJ et al (2007) Validation of a short tandem repeat multiplex typing system for genetic individualization of domestic cat samples. Croat Med J 48:547–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eichmann C, Berger B, Parson W (2004) A proposed nomenclature for 15 canine-specific polymorphic STR loci for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 118:249–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellmann AP, Rohleder U, Eichmann C et al (2006) A proposal for standardization in forensic canine DNA typing: allele nomenclature of six canine-specific STR loci. J Forensic Sci 51:274–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van Asch B, Alves C, Gusmão L et al (2009) A new autosomal STR nineplex for canine identification and parentage testing. Electrophoresis 30:417–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glowatzki-Mullis ML, Gaillard C, Wigger G et al (1995) Microsatellite-based parentage control in cattle. Anim Genet 26:7–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peelman LJ, Mortiaux F, Van Zeveren A et al (1998) Evaluation of the genetic variability of 23 bovine microsatellite markers in four Belgian cattle breeds. Anim Genet 29:161–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnabel RD, Ward TJ, Der JN (2000) Validation of 15 microsatellites for parentage testing in North American bison, Bison bison and domestic cattle. Anim Genet 31:360–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk L et al (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park SDE (2001) Trypanotolerance in west African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection. PhD thesis, University of Dublin

  17. Wilberg MJ, Dreher BP (2005) GENECAP software, department of fisheries and wildlife, Michigan State University

  18. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM et al (2004) GeneClass2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95:536–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G et al (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciampolini R, Cetica V, Ciani E et al (2006) Statistical analysis of individual assignment tests among four cattle breeds using fifteen STR loci. J Anim Sci 84:11–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moioli N, Napolitano F, Catillo G (2004) Genetic diversity between piedmontese, maremmana and Podolica cattle creeds. J Hered 95:250–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. H. P. van de Goor.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic Supplementary Material 1

(XLS 1620 kb)

Electronic Supplementary Material 2

(XLS 72 kb)

Electronic Supplementary Material Fig. 1

(DOC 60 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van de Goor, L.H.P., Koskinen, M.T. & van Haeringen, W.A. Population studies of 16 bovine STR loci for forensic purposes. Int J Legal Med 125, 111–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0353-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0353-8

Keywords

Navigation