Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Statistical methods to assess the reliability of measurements in the procedures for forensic age estimation

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In forensic science, anthropology, and archaeology, several techniques have been developed to estimate chronological age in both children and adults, using the relationship between age and morphological changes in the structure of teeth. Before implementing a statistical model to describe age as a function of the measured morphological variables, the reliability of the measurements of these variables must be evaluated using suitable statistical methods. This paper introduces some commonly used statistical methods for assessing the reliability of procedures for age estimation in the forensic field. The use of the concordance correlation coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient are explained. Finally, some pitfalls in the choice of the statistical methods to assess reliability of the measurements in age estimation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cardoso HF (2008) Age estimation of adolescent and young adult male and female skeletons II, epiphyseal union at the upper limb and scapular girdle in a modern Portuguese skeletal sample. Am J Phys Anthropol 137:97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Mühler M, Wernecke KD, Geserick G (2004) Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 118:5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee KK, Agarwal BB (1998) Estimation of age from epiphyseal union at the wrist and ankle joints in the capital city of India. Forensic Sci Int 98:31–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Mirtella D, Cingolani M (2006) Carpals and epiphyses of radius and ulna as age indicators. Int J Legal Med 120:143–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt S, Baumann U, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2008) Study of age dependence of epiphyseal ossification of the hand skeleton. Int J Legal Med 122:51–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Castriota-Scanderbeg A, Sacco MC, Emberti-Gialloreti L, Fraracci L (1998) Skeletal age assessment in children and young adults: comparison between a newly developed sonographic method and conventional methods. Skeletal Radiol 27:271–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lynnerup N, Belard E, Buch-Olsen K, Sejrsen B, Damgaard-Pedersen K (2008) Intra- and interobserver error of the Greulich-Pyle method as used on a Danish forensic sample. Forensic Sci Int 179:242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Büken B, Safak AA, Yazici B, Büken E, Mayda AS (2007) Is the assessment of bone age by the Greulich-Pyle method reliable at forensic age estimation for Turkish children? Forensic Sci Int 173:146–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackes MK (1985) Pubic symphysis age distributions. Am J Phys Anthropol 68:281–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sinha A, Gupta V (1995) A study on estimation of age from pubic symphysis. Forensic Sci Int 75:73–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimmerle EH, Konigsberg LW, Jantz RL, Baraybar JP (2008) Analysis of age-at-death estimation through the use of pubic symphyseal data. J Forensic Sci 53:558–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berg GE (2008) Pubic bone age estimation in adult women. J Forensic Sci 53:569–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorandeu A, Coulibaly B, Piercecchi-Marti MD, Bartoli C, Gaudart J, Baccino E, Leonetti G (2008) Age-at-death estimation based on the study of frontosphenoidal sutures. Forensic Sci Int 177:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Galera V, Ubelaker DH, Hayek LA (1998) Comparison of macroscopic cranial methods of age estimation applied to skeletons from the Terry Collection. J Forensic Sci 43:933–939

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ubelaker DH, Parra RC (2008) Application of three dental methods of adult age estimation from intact single rooted teeth to a Peruvian sample. J Forensic Sci 53:608–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meinl A, Huber CD, Tangl S, Gruber GM, Teschler-Nicola M, Watzek G (2008) Comparison of the validity of three dental methods for the estimation of age at death. Forensic Sci Int 178:96–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cameriere R, De Angelis D, Ferrante L, Scarpino F, Cingolani M (2007) Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth: a European formula. Int J Legal Med 121:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Knell B, Ruhstaller P, Prieels F, Schmeling A (2009) Dental age diagnostics by means of radiographical evaluation of the growth stages of lower wisdom teeth. Int J Legal Med. 2009 Feb 25

  19. Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G (2009) Human dental age estimation using third molar developmental stages: does a Bayesian approach outperform regression models to discriminate between juveniles and adults? Int J Legal Med Feb 24

  20. Alt KW, Rösing FW, Teschler-Nicola M (1998) Dental Anthropology. Springer, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Belcastro MG, Bonfiglioli B, Rastelli E, Cingolani M (2007) Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in canines by peri-apical X-rays. J Forensic Sci 52:166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prince DA, Ubelaker DH (2002) Application of Lamendin's adult dental aging technique to a diverse skeletal sample. J Forensic Sci 47:107–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Acsàdi G, Nemeskéri J (1970) History of Human span and mortality. Akademiai Kiadò, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schour I, Massler M (1941) Development of human dentition. J Am Dent Assoc 28:1153

    Google Scholar 

  25. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45:211–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gustafson G, Koch G (1974) Age estimation up to 16 years based on dental development. Odont Revy 25:297–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Deutsch D, Pe'er E, Gedalia I (1984) Changes in size, morphology and weight of human anterior teeth during the fetal period. Growth 48:74–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liversidge HM (1999) Dental maturation of 18th and 19th century British children using Demirjian's method. Int J Paediatr Dent 9:111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B, Carels C (2001) Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian's technique revisited. J Forensic Sci 46:893–895

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M (2006) Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth. Int J Legal Med 120:49–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 212–236

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 2:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dalgaard P (2008) Introductory Statistics with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maber M, Liversidge HM, Hector MP (2006) Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 159S:S68–S73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Liversidge HM, Prieto JL, Brkic H (2008) Accuracy of age estimation in children using radiograph of developing teeth. Forensic Sci Int 176:173–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Polytechnic University of Marche. Part of this research was presented at the FASE Meeting 2007, Macerata, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Biotecnologie Applicate, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Via Tronto 10/A, 60020, Ancona, Italy

    L. Ferrante

  2. AgEstination project, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Macerata, Via Don Minzoni, 9, 62100, Macerata, Italy

    R. Cameriere

Authors
  1. L. Ferrante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Cameriere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Cameriere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrante, L., Cameriere, R. Statistical methods to assess the reliability of measurements in the procedures for forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med 123, 277–283 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0349-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0349-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation