Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Specificity of mtDNA-directed PCR—influence of NUclear MTDNA insertion (NUMT) contamination in routine samples and techniques

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nuclear mitochondrial insertions (NUMTs) are sequences homologous to mtDNA, which are present throughout the human nuclear genome. The possibility that these sequences may be accidentally amplified in reactions directed to mtDNA has been raised and evaluated by different groups and by different means. Despite that, data is still missing on the specificity of PCRs in routine procedures in what concerns contamination with nuclear mtDNA insertions (NUMTs). In this work, we performed PCR sequencing reactions with primers directed either to mitochondrial or to NUMT DNA with different annealing temperatures and in different tissues. We observed that (a) contamination with NUMTs depends on the sample and tissue, and (b) employing routine techniques, there is no risk of co-amplification. Only when mtDNA is almost completely removed from the samples does the number of NUMT copies exceed mitochondrial sequences, i.e., only in samples with virtually no mtDNA, such as those resulting from preferential semen lysis, is there a risk of accidental amplification of NUMTs. We suggest that to evaluate a possible co-amplification of NUMT DNA, it is more relevant to take into account sample processing and original tissue of the samples, and consequently the relative proportions of NUMT and mtDNA, rather than the presence of NUMTs by itself, irrespectively of its proportion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bandelt HJ, Salas A, Lutz-Bonengel S (2004) Artificial recombination in forensic mtDNA population databases. Int J Legal Med 118:267–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pereira L, Richards M, Goios A et al (2006) Evaluating the forensic informativeness of mtDNA haplogroup H sub-typing on a Eurasian scale. Forensic Sci Int 159:43–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira L, Richards M, Goios A et al (2005) High-resolution mtDNA evidence for the late-glacial resettlement of Europe from an Iberian refugium. Genome Res 15:19–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Torroni A, Achilli A, Macaulay V, Richards M, Bandelt HJ (2006) Harvesting the fruit of the human mtDNA tree. Trends Genet 22:339–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace DC (1999) Mitochondrial diseases in man and mouse. Science 283:1482–1488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrnstadt C, Howell N (2004) An evolutionary perspective on pathogenic mtDNA mutations: haplogroup associations of clinical disorders. Mitochondrion 4:791–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goios A, Nogueira C, Pereira C, Vilarinho L, Amorim A, Pereira L (2005) mtDNA single macrodeletions associated with myopathies: absence of haplogroup-related increased risk. J Inherit Metab Dis 28:769–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis RE, Miller S, Herrnstadt C et al (1997) Mutations in mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase genes segregate with late-onset Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:4526–4531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallace DC, Stugard C, Murdock D, Schurr T, Brown MD (1997) Ancient mtDNA sequences in the human nuclear genome: a potential source of errors in identifying pathogenic mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:14900–14905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirano M, Shtilbans A, Mayeux R, Davidson MM, DiMauro S, Knowles JA, Schon EA (1997) Apparent mtDNA heteroplasmy in Alzheimer’s disease patients and in normals due to PCR amplification of nucleus-embedded mtDNA pseudogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:14894–14899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bravi CM, Parson W, Bandelt HJ (2006) Numts revisited. In: Bandelt HJ, Macaulay V, Richards M (eds) Human mitochondrial DNA and the evolution of Homo sapiens. Springer, Berlin, pp 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thangaraj K, Joshi MB, Reddy AG, Rasalkar AA, Singh L (2003) Sperm mitochondrial mutations as a cause of low sperm motility. J Androl 24:388–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. May-Panloup P, Chrétien MF, Savagner F, Vasseur C, Jean M, Malthiery Y, Reynier P (2003) Increased sperm mitochondrial DNA content in male infertility. Hum Reprod 18:550–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pereira L, Gonçalves J, Goios A, Rocha T, Amorim A (2005) Increased sperm mitochondrial DNA content in male infertility. Int J Androl 28:241–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roth DB, Porter TN, Wilson JH (1985) Mechanisms of nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 5:2599–2697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Woischnik M, Moraes CT (2002) Pattern of organization of human mitochondrial pseudogenes in the nuclear genome. Genome Res 12:885–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zischler H, Geisert H, von Haeseler A, Paabo S (1995) A nuclear ‘fossil’ of the mitochondrial D-loop and the origin of modern humans. Nature 378:489–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mishmar D, Ruiz-Pesini E, Brandon M, Wallace DC (2004) Mitochondrial DNA-like sequences in the nucleus (NUMTs): insights into our African origins and the mechanism of foreign DNA integration. Hum Mutat 23:125–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ricchetti M, Tekaia F, Dujon B (2004) Continued colonization of the human genome by mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Biol 2:E273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parr RL, Maki J, Reguly B et al (2006) The pseudo-mitochondrial genome influences mistakes in heteroplasmy interpretation. BMC Genomics 7:185–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goios A, Amorim A, Pereira L (2006) Mitochondrial DNA pseudogenes in the nuclear genome as possible sources of contamination. International Congress Series 1288. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 697–699

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bensasson D, Zhang D, Hartl DL, Hewitt GM (2001) Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution’s misplaced witnesses. Trends Ecol Evol 16:314–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Behar DM, Metspalu E, Kivisild T et al (2006) The matrilineal ancestry of Ashkenazi Jewry: portrait of a recent founder event. Am J Hum Genet 78:487–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Macaulay V, Hill C, Achilli A et al (2005) Single, rapid coastal settlement of Asia revealed by analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes. Science 308:1034–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Montesino M, Salas A, Crespillo M et al (2006) Analysis of body fluid mixtures by mtDNA sequencing: An inter-laboratory study of the GEP-ISFG working group. Forensic Sci Int 168:42–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Álvarez-Iglesias V, Jaime JC, Carracedo A, Salas A (2007) Coding region mitochondrial DNA SNPs: targeting east Asian and Native American haplogroups. Forensic Sci Int Genetics 1:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the donors of the samples used in this study. We are also very grateful to Marta Montesino for the technical support. This work was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through a research grant to A.G. (SFRH/BD/16518/2004) and by “Programa Operacional Ciência, e Inovação 2010” (POCI 2010), VI Programa-Quadro (2002–2006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Goios.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

Target sequence used in the NUMT analysis. Sequence on top is mtDNA and the dotted sequence is the corresponding region in NUMT AL359496.30. Primers used are marked. DP1 and DP2 are diagnostic positions used to distinguish mtDNA from NUMT (JPEG 166 kb)

Fig. S2

Electropherograms (forward and reverse sequencing) obtained for diagnostic position 1 when the amplification produced: a pure mtDNA, b a mixture of NUMT and mtDNA or c pure NUMT DNA (JPEG 656 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goios, A., Prieto, L., Amorim, A. et al. Specificity of mtDNA-directed PCR—influence of NUclear MTDNA insertion (NUMT) contamination in routine samples and techniques. Int J Legal Med 122, 341–345 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0191-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0191-5

Keywords

Navigation