Abstract
The importance and prestige of a scientific journal is increasingly being judged by the number of times the articles it publishes are cited or referenced in articles published in other scientific journals. Citation counting is also used to assess the merits of individual scientists when academic promotion and tenure are decided. With the help of Thomson, Institute for Scientific Information (Thomson ISI) a citation database was created for six leading forensic science and legal medicine journals. This database was used to determine the most highly cited articles, authors, journals and the most prolific authors of articles in the forensic sciences. The forensic science and legal medicine journals evaluated were: Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS), Forensic Science International (FSI), International Journal of Legal Medicine (IJLM), Medicine, Science and the Law (MSL), American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology (AJFMP), and Science and Justice (S&J). The resulting forensics database contained 14,210 papers published between 1981 and 2003. This in-depth bibliometric analysis has identified the crème de la crème in forensic science and legal medicine in a quantitative and objective way by citation analysis with focus on articles, authors and journals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Horton R (1998) A fair reward. Lancet 352:892
Adam D (2002) The counting house. Nature 415:726–729
Garfield E (1979) Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 227:669–671
Garfield E (1979) Citation indexing, its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. ISI Press, Philadelphia
Cronin B (1984) The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. Taylor Graham, London
Jones AW (1998) Some thoughts and reflections on authorship. Alcohol Alcohol 31:11–15
Grinnell F (1992) The scientific attitude. Guilford Press, London, New York
Sindermann CJ (2001) Winning the games scientists play. Perseus, Cambridge MA
Jones AH, McLellan F (eds) (2000) Ethical issues in biomedical publication. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Williams G (1998) Misleading, unscientific and unjust: the United Kingdoms research assessment exercise. BMJ 316:1079–1082
Reynolds TM, Wierzbicki AS (2004) Does activity in research correlate with visibility? J Clin Pathol 57:426–427
King J (1987) A review of bibliometrics and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J Inform Sci 13:261–276
King DA (2004) The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430:311–316
Lawrence PA (2003) The politics of publication. Nature 422:259–260
Wu R (2004) Making an impact. Nature 428:206–207
MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR (1989) Citation analysis and the science policy arena. Trends Biochem Sci 14:8–12
Garfield E (1998) How can impact factors be improved. BMJ 313:411–413
Seglen PO (1997) Citation and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52:1050–1056
Opthof T (2001) Sense and nonsense about impact factors. Cardiovasc Res 33:1–7
Jones AW (2003) Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals—what do the numbers really mean? Forensic Sci Int 133:1–8
Garfield E (1964) Science citation index, a new dimension in indexing. Science 144:649–654
Garfield E (1987) 100 Citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 257:52–59
Terajima K, Åneman A (2003) Citation classics in anaesthesia and pain journals: a literature review in the era of the internet. Acta Anaesthsiol Scand 47:655–663
Cronin B, Atkins HB (2000) The web of knowledge—A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph series, Information Today Inc., Medford
Cole S (1989) Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends Biochem Sci 14:9–13
Hamilton DP (1990) Publishing by and for the numbers. Science 250:1131–1132
Foster KR, Huber PW (1999) Judging science; scientific knowledge and the federal courts. MIT Press, Cambridge
Hamilton DP (1991) Research papers: who’s uncited now? Science 251:25
Garfield E (1996) When to cite. Library Q 66:449–458
Jones AW (1995) Evaluating the work of forensic scientists by citation analysis. J Forensic Sci 40:529–530
Jones AW (1998) Citation trends and practices in the Journal of Forensic Sciences as documented by ISI’s journal citation report. J Forensic Sci 43:439–444
Acknowledgement
David A. Pendlebury, analyst with Thomson ISI (Institute for Scientific Information), Philadelphia, PA., generously helped in acquiring the forensics database used for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, A.W. Crème de la crème in forensic science and legal medicine. Int J Legal Med 119, 59–65 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0512-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0512-x