Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Y-STR analysis for detection and objective confirmation of child sexual abuse

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated 26 child sexual assault cases for the incorporation of Y-STR screening in the routine detection and objective confirmation of sexual contact between the child victim and the perpetrator. Various samples, e.g. vaginal or anal swabs from patients aged 2–17 years old (25 females, 1 male), were collected 6–72 h after the incident. Due to the limited amounts of DNA in these samples, total DNA was extracted using a one-step procedure and screened with autosomal STRs to detect signs of a victim-assailant DNA mixture and with Y-STRs for assailant DNA. Autosomal STRs failed to give signs of victim-assailant DNA mixtures while Y-STRs were detected in 24 of the 26 cases corresponding to a success rate of 92.3%. With the possible presence of both male sperm and/or male epithelial cells in forensic evidence, Y-STR DNA markers were detected regardless of external ejaculation, microscopic detection of sperm and with post-coital intervals of up to 72 h. While only partial profiles were generated owing to low quantities of male DNA present, Y-STR screening results can serve as objective evidence of sexual contact in child sexual abuse cases involving victims who do not have any previous sexual history. This type of evidence can corroborate child victim testimony and spare the child victim from further trauma caused by prolonged forensic investigations and court proceedings. Alternatively, Y-STR screening can provide objective proof of non-involvement of an accused with the victim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Adhikain Para Sa Karapatang P ambata (AKAP)—Ateneo Human Rights Center (2002) Aninterdisciplinary analysis of Philippine jurisprudence on child sexual abuse. UNICEF, Makati City, Philippines

  2. Bauer M, Patzelt D (2003) Protamine mRNA as molecular marker for spermatozoa in semen stains. Int J Legal Med 117:175–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Christian CW, Lavelle JM, De Jong AR, Loiselle J, Brenner L, Joffe M (2000) Forensic evidence findings in prepubertal victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics 106:100–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins KA (1998) The laboratory’s role in detecting sexual assault. Lab Med 29:361–365

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Ungria MCA, Calacal GC, Magno MMF, et al. (2001) DNA evidence in Philippine courts: a case report. Philipp Law Gaz 13:46–49

    Google Scholar 

  6. Federal Bureau of Investigation Crime Laboratory (1994). PCR-based typing protocols. United States Department of Justice

  7. Finkle MA, Dejong AR (2001) Medical findings in child sexual assault. In: Reece RM, Ludwig S (eds) Child abuse medical diagnosis and management, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, PA, pp 268–272

  8. Gill P, Brenner C, Brinkmann B, et al. (2001) DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. Int J Legal Med 114:305–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall A, Ballantyne J (2003) Novel Y-STR typing strategies reveal the genetic profile of the semen donor in extended interval post-coital cervicovaginal samples. Forensic Sci Int 125:212–216

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halos SC, Chu JY, Ferreon ACM, Magno MMF (1999) Philippine population database at nine microsatellite loci for forensic and paternity applications. Forensic Sci Int 101:27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanson EK, Ballantyne J (2004) A highly discriminating 21 locus Y-STR “megaplex” system designed to augment the minimal haplotype loci for forensic casework. J Forensic Sci 49:40–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kayser M, Caglia A, Corach D, et al. (1997). Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: a multicenter study. Int J Legal Med 110:125–133, Appendix 141–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lessig R, Willuweit S, Krawczak M, et al. (2003) Asian online Y-STR haplotype reference database. Legal Med (Tokyo) 5 [Suppl]:S160–163

  14. Parson W, Niederstatter H, Kochl S, Steinlechner M, Berger B (2001) When autosomal short tandem repeats fail: optimized primer and reaction design for Y-chromosome short tandem repeat analysis in forensic casework. Croat Med J 42:285–287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parson W, Niederstätter H, Brandstätter A, Berger B (2003) Improved specificity of Y-STR typing in DNA mixture samples. Int J Legal Med 117:109–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. People of the Philippines versus Victoriano Paras (1999) Criminal Case No. 85974–85978, Promulgated by the Regional Trial Court, Branch 163, Pasig City, Philippines

  17. Sibille I, Duverneuil C, Lorin de la Grandmaison G et al. (2002) Y-STR DNA amplification as biological evidence in sexually assaulted female victims with no cytological detection of spermatozoa. Forensic Sci Int 125:212–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan M, Delfin F, Calacal G, Roewer L, De Ungria MCA (2004) Y-chromosome STR allele frequency distribution among male Filipinos in the National Capital Region for forensic applications. Philipp J Sci 132:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuji A, Ishiko A, Ikeda N, Yamaguchi H (2001) Personal identification using Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats from bodily fluids mixed with semen. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 22:288–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the European Commission, the Philippine Council for Advanced Science Research Technology and the Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Development of the University of the Philippines, Diliman. The contents of this paper do not necessarily represent the views of the European Commission. The authors also acknowledge Dr Raquel Fortun for interesting insights during the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Corazon A. De Ungria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delfin, F.C., Madrid, B.J., Tan, M.P. et al. Y-STR analysis for detection and objective confirmation of child sexual abuse. Int J Legal Med 119, 158–163 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0503-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-004-0503-y

Keywords

Navigation