Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture properties of the human mandible

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of seven human mandibles were struck to breaking point under standardised conditions using a pendulum. The cortical deformation for two impact directions was measured with strain gauge strips located at eight defined sites. Fronto-median impacts led to mostly bilateral and always multiple fractures in the posterior area of the bone, especially in the collum and the condyle. The fracture threshold was between 2.5 and 3.1 kN. Lateral impact caused fractures near the impact area as direct fractures of the ipsilateral corpus. Mainly single and double fractures were observed. For lateral impact the fracture threshold was between 0.6 and 0.8 kN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rougé-Maillart C, Tracqui A, Tortel MC, Pessaux P, Penneau M, Ludes B (2002) Fatal blunt pancreatic trauma secondary to assault and battery: a case report. Int J Legal Med 115:162–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Darok M, Beham-Schmid C, Gattering R, Roll P (2001) Sudden death from myocardial contusion following an isolated blunt force trauma to the chest. Int J Legal Med 115:85–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vock R (2001) Liver rupture caused by isolated blunt force impact: the result of a blow, a kick or a fall? Int J Legal Med 114:244–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer U, Benthaus S, Du Chesne A, Wannhof H, Zöllner B, Joos U (1999) Untersuchung von Patienten mit Gesichtsschädelfrakturen unter ätiologischen und rechtsrelevanten Gesichtspunkten. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 3:152–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brook IM, Wood N (1983) Aetiology and incidence of facial fractures in adults. Int J Oral Surg 12:293–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Hove A, Lolom P, Sapanet M, Descrozailles JM (2000) Les fractures mandibulaires. Etude de l'activité du service de chirurgie exmaxillo-faciale et stomatologie du CHU de Poitiers de 1978 à 1997. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 101:309–318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allan BP, Daly CG (1990) Fractures of the mandible. A 35-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:268–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon I, Shapiro HA (1975) Forensic medicine—a guide to principles. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh

  9. Du Chesne A, Unnewehr M, Schmidt PF et al (2003) Deformation characteristics of the human mandible in low impact experiments. Int J Legal Med, in press

  10. Arendts FJ, Sigolotto C (1990) Mechanische Kennwerte des Human-Unterkiefers und Untersuchung zum "in-vivo"-Verhalten des kompakten Knochengewebes. Ein Beitrag zur Darstellung der Biomechanik des Unterkiefers—Teil 2. Biomed Tech (Berl) 35:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huelke DF, Harger JH (1968) Mechanisms in the production of mandibular fractures: an experimental study. J Oral Surg 26:86–91

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer U, Vollmer D, Homann C et al. (2000) Experimentelle und Finite-Elemente-Analyse der Biomechanik des Unterkiefers unter Belastung. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 4:14–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohkura K, Harada K, Morishima S, Enomoto S (2001) Changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after orthognathic surgery for correction of mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 91:141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinogaya T, Sodeyama A, Matsumoto M (1999) Bite force and occlusal load distribution in normal complete dentitions of young adults. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 7:65–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Joch W, Krause J, Fritsche P (1982) Schlagkraft und Bewegungsschnelligkeit des Boxers. Leistungssport 12:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith MS, Dyson RJ, Hale T, Janaway L (2000) Development of a boxing dynamometer and its punch force discrimination efficacy. J Sports Sci 18:445–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boole JR, Holtel M, Amoroso P, Yore M (2001) 5196 Mandible fractures among 4381 active duty army soldiers, 1980 to 1998. Laryngoscope 111:1691–1696

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fridrich KL, Pena-Velasco G, Olson RA (1992) Changing trends with mandibular fractures: a review of 1067 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:586–589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vollmer D, Meyer U, Joos U, Vegh A, Piffko J (2000) Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28:91–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Austermann K-H, Lisiak O (1980) Untersuchung zur Biomechanik von Kiefergelenkbrüchen. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 25:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huelke DF, Patrick LM (1964) Mechanics in the production of mandibular fractures: strain-gauge measurements of impacts to the chin. J Dent Res 43:437–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kober C, Sader R, Thiele H, Bauer H-J, Zeilhofer H-F, Hoffmann K-H, Horch H-H (2001) Spannungsanalyse des menschlichen Unterkiefers bei traumatologischen Standardsituationen mittels numerischer Simulation. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 5:114–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Verma RB, Sherman O (2001) Athletic stress fractures: part I. History, epidemiology, physiology, risk factors, radiography, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Orthop 30:798–806

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hodgson VR (1967) Tolerance of the facial bones to impact. Am J Anat 120:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hampson D (1995) Facial injury: a review of biomechanical studies and rest procedures for facial injury assessment. J Biomech 28:321–327

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Azevedo AB, Trent RB, Ellis A (1998) Population-based analysis of 10,766 hospitalizations for mandibular fractures in California, 1991 to 1993. J Trauma 45:1084–1087

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Busuito M J, Smith DJ, Robson MC (1986) Mandibular fractures in an urban trauma center. J Trauma 26:826–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dischinger PC, Cushing BM, Kerns TJ (1993) Injury patterns associated with direction of impact: drivers admitted to trauma centers. J Trauma 35:454–459

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huelke DF, Compton CP (1983) Facial injuries in automobile crashes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:2414

    Google Scholar 

  30. Oikarinen K, Ignatius E, Kauppi H, Silvennoinen U (1993) Mandibular fractures in northern Finland in the 1980s—a 10-year study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:23–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shepherd JP (1989) Surgial, socio-economic and forensic aspects of assault: a review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27:89–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schneider DC, Nahum AM (1974) Impact studies of facial bones and skull. Proceedings of the 16th Stapp Car Crash Conference , SAE No. 720966, p 204

  33. Nahum AM (1975) The biomechanics of facial bone fracture. Laryngoscope 85:140–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. DuChesne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unnewehr, M., Homann, C., Schmidt, P.F. et al. Fracture properties of the human mandible. Int J Legal Med 117, 326–330 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-003-0391-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-003-0391-6

Keywords

Navigation