Abstract
The addition of hydroxyurea after the onset of S phase allows replication to start and permits the successive detecting of replication-dependent joint DNA molecules and chicken foot structures in the synchronous nuclei of Physarum polycephalum. We find evidence for a very high frequency of reversed replication forks upon replication stress. The formation of these reversed forks is dependent on the presence of joint DNA molecules, the impediment of the replication fork progression by hydroxyurea, and likely on the propensity of some replication origins to reinitiate replication to counteract the action of this compound. As hydroxyurea treatment enables us to successively detect the appearance of joint DNA molecules and then of reversed replication forks, we propose that chicken foot structures are formed both from the regression of hydroxyurea-frozen joint DNA molecules and from hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks. These experiments underscore the transient nature of replication fork regression, which becomes detectable due to the hydroxyurea-induced slowing down of replication fork progression.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvino GM, Collingwood D, Murphy JM, Delrow J, Brewer BJ, Raghuraman MK (2007) Replication in hydroxyurea: it’s a matter of time. Mol Cell Biol 27:6396–6406
Anglana M, Apiou F, Bensimon A, Debatisse M (2003) Dynamics of DNA replication in mammalian somatic cells: nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing. Cell 114:385–394
Atkinson J, Mc Glynn P (2009) Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res 37:3475–3492
Bénard M, Lagnel C, Pallotta D, Pierron G (1996) Mapping of a replication origin within the promoter region of two unlinked, abundantly transcribed actin genes of Physarum polycephalum. Mol Cell Biol 16:968–976
Bénard M, Maric C, Pierron G (2001) DNA replication-dependent formation of joint DNA molecules in Physarum polycephalum. Mol Cell 7:971–980
Branzei D, Foiani M (2010) Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:208–219
Cotta-Ramusino C, Fachinetti D, Lucca C, Doksali Y, Lopes M, Sogo J, Foiani M (2005) Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol Cell 17:135–159
Courbet S, Gay S, Arnoult N, Wronka G, Anglana M, Brison O, Debatisse M (2008) Replication fork movement sets chromatin loop size and origin choice in mammalian cells. Nature 455:557–560
Cox MM, Goodman MF, Kreuser KN, Sheratt DJ, Sandler SJ, Marians KJ (2000) The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Nature 404:37–41
De Piccoli G, Katou Y, Itoh T, Nakato R, Shirahige K, Labib K (2012) Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol Cell 45:696–704
Fachinetti D, Bermejo R, Cocito A, Minardi S, Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Shirahige K, Azvolinsky A, Zakian VA, Foiani M (2010) Replication termination at eukaryotic chromosomes is mediated by Top2 and occurs at genomic loci containing pausing elements. Mol Cell 39:595–605
Feng W, Collingwood D, Boeck ME, Fox LA, Alvino G, Fangman WL, Raghuraman MK, Brewer BJ (2006) Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication. Nat Cell Biol 8:148–155
Fierro-Fernandez M, Hernandez P, Krimer DB, Schvartzman JB (2007a) Replication fork reversal occurs spontaneously after digestion but is constrained in supercoiled domains. J Biol Chem 282:18190–18196
Fierro-Fernandez M, Hernandez P, Krimer DB, Stasiak A, Schvartzman JB (2007b) Topological locking restrains replication fork reversal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:1500–1505
Follonier C, Oehler J, Herrador R, Lopes M (2013) Friedreich’s ataxia-associated GAA repeats induce replication-fork reversal and unusual molecular junctions. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:486–495
Fouquet H, Bohme R, Wick R, Sauer HW (1975) Some evidence for replication-transcription coupling in Physarum polycephalum. J Cell Sci 18:27–39
Gilbert DM (2007) Replication origin plasticity, Taylor-made: inhibition vs recruitment of origins under conditions of replication stress. Chromosoma 116:341–347
Hegnauer AM, Hustedt N, Shimada K, Pike BL, Vogel M, Amsler P, Rubin SM, Van Leeuwen F, Guénolé A, Van Attikum H, Thomä N, Gasser SM (2012) An N-terminal acidic region of Sgs1 interacts with Rpa70 and recruits Rad53 kinase to stalled forks. EMBO J 31:3768–3783
Hu J, Sun L, Shen F, Chen Y, Hua Y, Liu Y, Zhang M, Hu Y, Wang Q, Xu W, Sun F, Ji J, Murray JM, Carr AM, Kong D (2012) The intra-S phase checkpoint targets Dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing. Cell 149:1221–1232
Lai MS, Foiani M (2012) Dna2 offers support for stalled forks. Cell 149:1181–1183
Liberi G, Cotta-Ramusino C, Lopes M, Sogo J, Conti C, Bensimon A, Foiani M (2006) Methods to study replication fork collapse in budding yeast. Methods Enzymol 409:442–462
Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M, Newlon CS, Foiani M (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412:557–561
Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Liberi G, Foiani M (2003) Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms. Mol Cell 12:1499–1510
Maric C, Benard M, Pierron G (2010) RNase-dependent discontinuities associated with the crossovers of spontaneously formed joint DNA molecules in Physarum polycephalum. Chromosoma 119:601–611
Mc Glynn P, Lloyd RG, Marians KJ (2001) Formation fo Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:8235–8240
Neelsen KJ, Zanini IMY, Herrador R, Lopes M (2013a) Oncogenes induce genotoxic stress by mitotic processing of unusual replication intermediates. J Cell Biol 2000:699–708
Neelsen KJ, Zanini IMY, Mijic S, Herrador R, Zellweger R, Ray Chaudhuri A, Creavin KD, Blow JJ, Lopes M (2013b) Deregulated origin licensing leads to chromosomal breaks by rereplication of a gapped DNA template. Genes Dev 27:2537–2542
Nitani N, Yadani C, Yabuuchi H, Masukata H, Nakagawa T (2008) Mcm4 C-terminal domain of MCM helicase prevents excessive formation of single-stranded DNA at stalled replication forks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:12973–12978
Postow L, Crisona NJ, Peter BJ, Hardy CD, Cozzarelli NR (2001) Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:8219–8226
Ray Chaudhuri A, Hashimoto Y, Herrador R, Neelsen KJ, Fachinetti D, Bermejo R, Cocito A, Costanzo V, Lopes M (2012) Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:417–423
Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M (2002) Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297:599–602
Vengrova S, Dalgaard JZ (2004) RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching. Genes Dev 18:794–804
Acknowledgments
We thank Dana Branzei for constructive discussions of our data and Gérard Pierron for critical analyses of our results. We also thank Marie-Noëlle Prioleau and Dominique Weil for their great supports. We are very grateful to Terence Strick for critical reading of the manuscript and to the reviewers for helping us in improving our work. This work was supported by a general funding from the CNRS, grant L494 from Association de la Recherche Contre le Cancer, and grant ORC454 from Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maric, C., Bénard, M. Replication forks reverse at high frequency upon replication stress in Physarum polycephalum . Chromosoma 123, 577–585 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-014-0471-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-014-0471-z