Skip to main content
Log in

Position of human chromosomes is conserved in mouse nuclei indicating a species-independent mechanism for maintaining genome organization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nonrandom positioning of chromosome territories in eukaryotic cells is largely correlated with gene density and is conserved throughout evolution. Gene-rich chromosomes are predominantly central, while gene-poor chromosomes are peripherally localized in interphase nuclei. We previously demonstrated that artificially introduced human chromosomes assume a position equivalent to their endogenous homologues in the diploid colon cancer cell line DLD-1. These chromosomal aneuploidies result in a significant increase in transcript levels, suggesting a relationship between genomic copy number, gene expression, and chromosome position. We previously proposed that each chromosome is marked by a “zip code” that determines its nonrandom position in the nucleus. In this paper, we investigated (1) whether mouse nuclei recognize such determinants of nuclear position on human chromosomes to facilitate their distinct partitioning and (2) if chromosome positioning and transcriptional activity remain coupled under these trans-species conditions. Using three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization, confocal microscopy, and gene expression profiling, we show (1) that gene-poor and gene-rich human chromosomes maintain their divergent but conserved positions in mouse–human hybrid nuclei and (2) that a foreign human chromosome is actively transcribed in mouse nuclei. Our results suggest a species-independent conserved mechanism for the nonrandom positioning of chromosomes in the three-dimensional interphase nucleus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolzer A, Kreth G, Solovei I, Koehler D, Saracoglu K, Fauth C, Muller S, Eils R, Cremer C, Speicher MR, Cremer T (2005) Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol 3:e157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Bickmore WA (1997) Scaffold attachments within the human genome. J Cell Sci 110(Pt 21):2673–2682

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer M, Kupper K, Wagler B, Wizelman L, von Hase J, Weiland Y, Kreja L, Diebold J, Speicher MR, Cremer T (2003) Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 162:809–820

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer T, Cremer C (2001) Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2:292–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA (1999) Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 145:1119–1131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deshler JO, Highett MI, Abramson T, Schnapp BJ (1998) A highly conserved RNA-binding protein for cytoplasmic mRNA localization in vertebrates. Curr Biol 8:489–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habermann FA, Cremer M, Walter J, Kreth G, von Hase J, Bauer K, Wienberg J, Cremer C, Cremer T, Solovei I (2001) Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells. Chromosome Res 9:569–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue J, Mitsuya K, Maegawa S, Kugoh H, Kadota M, Okamura D, Shinohara T, Nishihara S, Takehara S, Yamauchi K, Schulz TC, Oshimura M (2001) Construction of 700 human/mouse A9 monochromosomal hybrids and analysis of imprinted genes on human chromosome 6. J Hum Genet 46:137–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koi M, Shimizu M, Morita H, Yamada H, Oshimura M (1989) Construction of mouse A9 clones containing a single human chromosome tagged with neomycin-resistance gene via microcell fusion. Jpn J Cancer Res 80:413–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kugoh H, Mitsuya K, Meguro M, Shigenami K, Schulz TC, Oshimura M (1999) Mouse A9 cells containing single human chromosomes for analysis of genomic imprinting. DNA Res 6:165–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kupper K, Kolbl A, Biener D, Dittrich S, von Hase J, Thormeyer T, Fiegler H, Carter NP, Speicher MR, Cremer T, Cremer M (2007) Radial chromatin positioning is shaped by local gene density, not by gene expression. Chromosoma 116:285–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanctot C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T (2007) Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet 8:104–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malhas A, Lee CF, Sanders R, Saunders NJ, Vaux DJ (2007) Defects in lamin B1 expression or processing affect interphase chromosome position and gene expression. J Cell Biol 176:593–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer R, Brero A, von Hase J, Schroeder T, Cremer T, Dietzel S (2005) Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse. BMC Cell Biol 6:44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr C, Jasencakova Z, Meister A, Schubert I, Zink D (2003) Comparative analysis of the functional genome architecture of animal and plant cell nuclei. Chromosome Res 11:471–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meaburn KJ, Cabuy E, Bonne G, Levy N, Morris GE, Novelli G, Kill IR, Bridger JM (2007) Primary laminopathy fibroblasts display altered genome organization and apoptosis. Aging Cell 6:139–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mora L, Sanchez I, Garcia M, Ponsa M (2006) Chromosome territory positioning of conserved homologous chromosomes in different primate species. Chromosoma 115:367–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neusser M, Schubel V, Koch A, Cremer T, Muller S (2007) Evolutionarily conserved, cell type and species-specific higher order chromatin arrangements in interphase nuclei of primates. Chromosoma 116:307–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty A, Ruf S, Mulligan C, Hildreth V, Errington ML, Cooke S, Sesay A, Modino S, Vanes L, Hernandez D, Linehan JM, Sharpe PT, Brandner S, Bliss TV, Henderson DJ, Nizetic D, Tybulewicz VL, Fisher EM (2005) An aneuploid mouse strain carrying human chromosome 21 with Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 309:2033–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Nash HM, Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Wangsa D, Zhang H, Ghadimi BM, Macville M, Augustus M, Schrock E, Hilgenfeld E, Ried T (2001) Jumping translocations are common in solid tumor cell lines and result in recurrent fusions of whole chromosome arms. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 30:349–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parada LA, McQueen PG, Misteli T (2004) Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 5:R44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta K, Upender MB, Barenboim-Stapleton L, Nguyen QT, Wincovitch SM Sr., Garfield SH, Difilippantonio MJ, Ried T (2007) Artificially introduced aneuploid chromosomes assume a conserved position in colon cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2:e199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector DL (2003) The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 72:573–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe H, Kupper K, Ishida T, Neusser M, Mizusawa H (2005) Inter- and intra-specific gene-density-correlated radial chromosome territory arrangements are conserved in Old World monkeys. Cytogenet Genome Res 108:255–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe H, Muller S, Neusser M, von Hase J, Calcagno E, Cremer M, Solovei I, Cremer C, Cremer T (2002) Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4424–4429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe H, Nakagawa Y, Minegishi D, Hashimoto K, Tanaka N, Oshimura M, Sofuni T, Mizusawa H (2000) Human monochromosome hybrid cell panel characterized by FISH in the JCRB/HSRRB. Chromosome Res 8:319–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomizuka K, Yoshida H, Uejima H, Kugoh H, Sato K, Ohguma A, Hayasaka M, Hanaoka K, Oshimura M, Ishida I (1997) Functional expression and germline transmission of a human chromosome fragment in chimaeric mice. Nat Genet 16:133–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Upender MB, Habermann JK, McShane LM, Korn EL, Barrett JC, Difilippantonio MJ, Ried T (2004) Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells. Cancer Res 64:6941–6949

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weidtkamp-Peters S, Rahn HP, Cardoso MC, Hemmerich P (2006) Replication of centromeric heterochromatin in mouse fibroblasts takes place in early, middle, and late S phase. Histochem Cell Biol 125:91–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss MC, Green H (1967) Human-mouse hybrid cell lines containing partial complements of human chromosomes and functioning human genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 58:1104–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephen Wincovitch and Amalia Dutra (NHGRI/NIH) for use of the confocal microscope and for valuable discussions. We thank Media Cybernetics for help with 3D measurements and Buddy Chen, Tom Ellerman, and Joseph Cheng for IT support. We are grateful to Sudhir Varma, NCI, for critical comments and useful discussions on the manuscript. Hesed Padilla-Nash kindly provided the chromosome arm-specific painting probes. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Ried.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Misteli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sengupta, K., Camps, J., Mathews, P. et al. Position of human chromosomes is conserved in mouse nuclei indicating a species-independent mechanism for maintaining genome organization. Chromosoma 117, 499–509 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-008-0171-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-008-0171-7

Keywords

Navigation