, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 15–26 | Cite as

From the trap to the basket: getting to the bottom of the nuclear pore complex

  • Roderick Y. H. Lim
  • Ueli Aebi
  • Daniel Stoffler


Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are large supramolecular assemblies that perforate the double-membraned nuclear envelope and serve as the sole gateways of molecular exchange between the cytoplasm and the nucleus in interphase cells. Combining novel specimen preparation regimes with innovative use of high-resolution scanning electron microscopy, Hans Ris produced in the late eighties stereo images of the NPC with unparalleled clarity and structural detail, thereby setting new standards in the field. Since that time, efforts undertaken to resolve the molecular structure and architecture, and the numerous interactions that occur between NPC proteins (nucleoporins), soluble transport receptors, and the small GTPase Ran, have led to a deeper understanding of the functional role of NPCs in nucleocytoplasmic transport. In spite of these breakthroughs, getting to the bottom of the actual cargo translocation mechanism through the NPC remains elusive and controversial. Here, we review recent insights into NPC function by correlating structural findings with biochemical data. By introducing new experimental and computational results, we reexamine how NPCs can discriminate between receptor-mediated and passive cargo to promote vectorial translocation in a highly regulated manner. Moreover, we comment on the importance and potential benefits of identifying and experimenting with individual key components implicated in the translocation mechanism. We conclude by dwelling on questions that we feel are pertinent to a more rational understanding of the physical aspects governing NPC mechanics. Last but not least, we substantiate these uncertainties by boldly suggesting a new direction in NPC research as a means to verify such novel concepts, for example, a de novo designed ‘minimalist’ NPC.


Nuclear Pore Complex Central Pore Scanning Force Microscopy Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Transport Receptor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by the M.E. Müller Foundation of Switzerland, the ‘EU Network of Excellence 3D-EM’ project no. LSHG-CT-2004-502828, and the Swiss National Science Foundation through the National Centre of Competence (NCCR) in Nanoscale Science (Nanobiology). The authors would like to thank Dr. Birthe Fahrenkrog for providing us with Fig. 2a, and Dr. Bohumil Maco for providing us with Fig. 2c,d.


  1. Aebi U, Jarnik M, Reichelt, R, Engel A (1990) Structural analysis of the nuclear pore complex by conventional and scanning transmission electron microscopy (CTEM/STEM). EMSA Bull 20:69–76Google Scholar
  2. Akey CW (1990) Visualization of transport-related configurations of the nuclear-pore transporter. Biophys J 58:341–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akey CW, Radermacher M (1993) Architecture of the Xenopus nuclear pore complex revealed by three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 122:1–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen NPC, Huang L, Burlingame A, Rexach M (2001) Proteomic analysis of nucleoporin interacting proteins. J Biol Chem 276:29268–29274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball JR, Ullman KS (2005) Versatility at the nuclear pore complex: lessons learned from the nucleoporin Nup153. Chromosoma 114(5):319–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayliss R, Littlewood T, Stewart M (2000) Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-beta in nuclear trafficking. Cell 102:99–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayliss R, Littlewood T, Strawn LA, Wente SR, Stewart M (2002) GLFG and FxFG nucleoporins bind to overlapping sites on importin-beta. J Biol Chem 277:50597–50606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck M, Forster F, Ecke M, Plitzko JM, Melchior F, Gerisch G, Baumeister W, Medalia O (2004) Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 306:1387–1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ben-Efraim I, Gerace L (2001) Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import. J Cell Biol 152:411–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bickel T, Bruinsma R (2002) The nuclear pore complex mystery and anomalous diffusion in reversible gels. Biophys J 83:3079–3087PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Braunstein D, Spudich A (1994) Structure and activation dynamics of RBL-2H3 cells observed with scanning force microscopy. Biophys J 66:1717–1725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bustamante JO, Michelette ER, Geibel JP, Dean DA, Hanover JA, McDonnell TJ (2000) Calcium, ATP and nuclear pore channel gating. Pflugers Arch 439:433–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen M, Tzur YB, Neufeld E, Feinstein N, Delannoy MR, Wilson KL, Gruenbaum Y (2002) Transmission electron microscope studies of the nuclear envelope in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. J Struct Biol 140:232–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cordes VC, Reidenbach S, Rackwitz HR, Franke WW (1997) Identification of protein p270/Tpr as a constitutive component of the nuclear pore complex-attached intranuclear filaments. J Cell Biol 136:515–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denning DP, Uversky V, Patel SS, Fink AL, Rexach M (2002) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleoporin Nup2p is a natively unfolded protein. J Biol Chem 277:33447–33455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denning DP, Patel SS, Uversky V, Fink AL, Rexach M (2003) Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2450–2455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunker AK, Lawson JD, Brown CJ, Williams RM, Romero P, Oh JS, Oldfield CJ, Campen AM, Ratliff CR, Hipps KW, Ausio J, Nissen MS, Reeves R, Kang CH, Kissinger CR, Bailey RW, Griswold MD, Chiu M, Garner EC, Obradovic Z (2001) Intrinsically disordered protein. J Mol Graph Model 19:26–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U (2002) The vertebrate nuclear pore complex: from structure to function. Results Probl Cell Differ 35:25–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U (2003) The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:757–766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahrenkrog B, Hurt EC, Aebi U, Pante N (1998) Molecular architecture of the yeast nuclear pore complex: localization of Nsp1p subcomplexes. J Cell Biol 143:577–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fahrenkrog B, Maco B, Fager AM, Koser J, Sauder U, Ullman KS, Aebi U (2002) Domain-specific antibodies reveal multiple-site topology of Nup153 within the nuclear pore complex. J Struct Biol 140:254–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Folprecht G, Schneider S, Oberleithner H (1996) Aldosterone activates the nuclear pore transporter in cultured kidney cells imaged with atomic force microscopy. Pflugers Arch 432:831–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fribourg S, Braun IC, Izaurralde E, Conti E (2001) Structural basis for the recognition of a nucleoporin FG repeat by the NTF2-like domain of the TAP/p15 mRNA nuclear export factor. Mol Cell 8:645–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fried H, Kutay U (2003) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: taking an inventory. Cell Mol Life Sci 60:1659–1688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilchrist D, Mykytka B, Rexach M (2002) Accelerating the rate of disassembly of karyopherin center dot cargo complexes. J Biol Chem 277:18161–18172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldberg MW, Wiese C, Allen TD, Wilson KL (1997) Dimples, pores, star-rings, and thin rings on growing nuclear envelopes: evidence for structural intermediates in nuclear pore complex assembly. J Cell Sci 110(4):409–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldie KN, Pante N, Engel A, Aebi U (1994) Exploring native nuclear pore complex structure and conformation by scanning force microscopy in physiological buffers. J Vac Sci Technol B 1482–1485Google Scholar
  28. Grant RP, Neuhaus D, Stewart M (2003) Structural basis for the interaction between the Tap/NXF1 UBA domain and FG nucleoporins at 1A resolution. J Mol Biol 326:849–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hinshaw JE, Carragher BO, Milligan RA (1992) Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex. Cell 69:1133–1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoppener C, Siebrasse JP, Peters R, Kubitscheck U, Naber A (2005) High-resolution near-field optical imaging of single nuclear pore complexes under physiological conditions. Biophys J 88:3681–3688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Isgro TA, Schulten K (2005) Binding dynamics of isolated nucleoporin repeat regions to importin-ß. Structure in pressGoogle Scholar
  32. Izaurralde E, Kutay U, vonKobbe C, Mattaj IW, Gorlich D (1997) The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J 16:6535–6547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jaggi RD, Franco-Obregon A, Ensslin K (2003a) Quantitative topographical analysis of nuclear pore complex function using scanning force microscopy. Biophys J 85:4093–4098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaggi RD, Franco-Obregon A, Muhlhausser P, Thomas F, Kutay U, Ensslin K (2003b) Modulation of nuclear pore topology by transport modifiers. Biophys J 84:665–670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarnik M, Aebi U (1991) Toward a more complete 3-D structure of the nuclear pore complex. J Struct Biol 107:291–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keminer O, Peters R (1999) Permeability of single nuclear pores. Biophys J 77:217–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kiseleva E, Goldberg MW, Allen TD, Akey CW (1998) Active nuclear pore complexes in Chironomus: visualization of transporter configurations related to mRNP export J Cell Sci 111(2):223–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kiskin NI, Siebrasse JP, Peters R (2003) Optical microwell assay of membrane transport kinetics. Biophys J 85:2311–2322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kubitscheck U, Grunwald D, Hoekstra A, Rohleder D, Kues T, Siebrasse JP, Peters R (2005) Nuclear transport of single molecules: dwell times at the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 168:233–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kustanovich T, Rabin Y (2004) Metastable network model of protein transport through nuclear pores. Biophys J 86:2008–2016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu SM, Stewart M (2005) Structural basis for the high-affinity binding of nucleoporin Nup1p to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae importin-beta homologue, Kap95p. J Mol Biol 349:515–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Macara IG (2001) Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65:570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mosammaparast N, Pemberton LF (2004) Karyopherins: from nuclear-transport mediators to nuclear-function regulators. Trends Cell Biol 14:547–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oberleithner H, Brinckmann E, Schwab A, Krohne G (1994) Imaging nuclear pores of aldosterone-sensitive kidney cells by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:9784–9788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oberleithner H, Schneider S, Bustamante JO (1996) Atomic force microscopy visualizes ATP-dependent dissociation of multimeric TATA-binding protein before translocation into the cell nucleus. Pflugers Arch 432:839–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pante N, Aebi U (1993) The nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 122:977–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pante N, Aebi U (1996a) Molecular dissection of the nuclear pore complex. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 31:153–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pante N, Aebi U (1996b) Sequential binding of import ligands to distinct nucleopore regions during their nuclear import. Science 273:1729–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pante N, Bastos R, McMorrow I, Burke B, Aebi U (1994) Interactions and three-dimensional localization of a group of nuclear pore complex proteins. J Cell Biol 126:603–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pante N, Jarmolowski A, Izaurralde E, Sauder U, Baschong W, Mattaj IW (1997) Visualizing nuclear export of different classes of RNA by electron microscopy. RNA 3:498–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Paulillo SM, Phillips EM, Koser J, Sauder U, Ullman KS, Powers MA, Fahrenkrog B (2005) Nucleoporin domain topology is linked to the transport status of the nuclear pore complex. J Mol Biol 351:784–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Perez-Terzic C, Pyle J, Jaconi M, Stehno-Bittel L, Clapham DE (1996) Conformational states of the nuclear pore complex induced by depletion of nuclear Ca2+ stores. Science 273:1875–1877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Radtke T, Schmalz D, Coutavas E, Soliman TM, Peters R (2001) Kinetics of protein import into isolated Xenopus oocyte nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2407–2412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rakowska A, Danker T, Schneider SW, Oberleithner H (1998) ATP-induced shape change of nuclear pores visualized with the atomic force microscope. J Membr Biol 163:129–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reichelt R, Holzenburg A, Buhle EL Jr, Jarnik M, Engel A, Aebi U (1990) Correlation between structure and mass distribution of the nuclear pore complex and of distinct pore complex components. J Cell Biol 110:883–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rexach M, Blobel G (1995) Protein import into nuclei—association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins. Cell 83:683–692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ribbeck K, Gorlich D (2001) Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes. EMBO J 20:1320–1330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ribbeck K, Gorlich D (2002) The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion. EMBO J 21:2664–2671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Richards SA, Carey KL, Macara IG (1997) Requirement of guanosine triphosphate-bound Ran for signal-mediated nuclear protein export. Science 276:1842–1844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ris H (1989) Three-dimensional structure of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 109:134aGoogle Scholar
  61. Ris H (1997) High-resolution field-emission scanning electron microscopy of nuclear pore complex. Scanning 19:368–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ris H, Malecki M (1993) High-resolution field-emission scanning electron-microscope imaging of internal cell structures after epon extraction from sections—a new approach to correlative ultrastructural and immunocytochemical studies. J Struct Biol 111:148–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rout MP, Blobel G (1993) Isolation of the yeast nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 123:771–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao Y, Chait BT (2000) The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 148:635–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Magnasco MO, Chait BT (2003) Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture. Trends Cell Biol 13:622–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sanner MF, Stolz M, Burkhard P, Kong XP, Min G, Sun TT, Driamov S, Aebi U, Stoffler D (2005) Visualizing nature at work from the nano to the macro scale. Nanobiotechnology 1:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shah S, Tugendreich S, Forbes D (1998) Major binding sites for the nuclear import receptor are the internal nucleoporin Nup153 and the adjacent nuclear filament protein Tpr. J Cell Biol 141:31–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stoffler D, Fahrenkrog B, Aebi U (1999a) The nuclear pore complex: from molecular architecture to functional dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11:391–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stoffler D, Goldie KN, Feja B, Aebi U (1999b) Calcium-mediated structural changes of native nuclear pore complexes monitored by time-lapse atomic force microscopy. J Mol Biol 287:741–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stoffler D, Feja B, Fahrenkrog B, Walz J, Typke D, Aebi U (2003) Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. J Mol Biol 328:119–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stolz M, Stoffler D, Aebi U, Goldsbury C (2000) Monitoring biomolecular interactions by time-lapse atomic force microscopy. J Struct Biol 131:171–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strawn LA, Shen T, Shulga N, Goldfarb DS, Wente SR (2004) Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport. Nat Cell Biol 6:197–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ullman KS, Shah S, Powers MA, Forbes DJ (1999) The nucleoporin nup153 plays a critical role in multiple types of nuclear export. Mol Biol Cell 10:649–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Walther TC, Fornerod M, Pickersgill H, Goldberg M, Allen TD, Mattaj IW (2001) The nucleoporin Nup153 is required for nuclear pore basket formation, nuclear pore complex anchoring and import of a subset of nuclear proteins. EMBO J 20:5703–5714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Walther TC, Pickersgill HS, Cordes VC, Goldberg MW, Allen TD, Mattaj IW, Fornerod M (2002) The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. J Cell Biol 158:63–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang HW, Clapham DE (1999) Conformational changes of the in situ nuclear pore complex. Biophys J 77:241–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Yang Q, Rout MP, Akey CW (1998) Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. Mol Cell 1:223–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zeitler B, Weis K (2004) The FG-repeat asymmetry of the nuclear pore complex is dispensable for bulk nucleocytoplasmic transport in vivo. J Cell Biol 167:583–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zimmerman SB, Minton AP (1993) Macromolecular crowding—biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 22:27–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick Y. H. Lim
    • 1
  • Ueli Aebi
    • 1
  • Daniel Stoffler
    • 1
  1. 1.M.E. Müller Institute for Structural Biology, BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations