Skip to main content
Log in

An unpaired mouse centromere passes consistently through male meiosis and does not significantly compromise spermatogenesis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ST1 is an artificial mini-chromosome approximately 4.5 Mb in size containing mouse minor and major satellite DNA, human alphoid DNA and sequences derived from interval 5 of the human Y chromosome. Here we have measured the mitotic and meiotic transmission of ST1 and have used the mini-chromosome to define the ability of mice to monitor the presence of unpaired centromeres during meiosis. ST1 is mitotically stable, remaining intact and autonomous in mice for many generations. Female mice efficiently transmit ST1 to their offspring at a frequency approaching 50%. Male mice also reliably transmit the mini-chromosome, though to only 20% of their offspring. Presence of ST1 in males is not associated with any compromise in the output of the seminiferous epithelium nor with histological or immunocytochemical evidence of increased apoptosis, outcomes predicted for a synapsis checkpoint. These data indicate that the presence of an unpaired centromere is not sufficient to arrest male meiosis, implying that univalents are normally eliminated by a mechanism other than a tension-sensitive spindle checkpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–E
Fig. 2A, B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eaker S, Pyle A, Cobb J, Handel MA (2001) Evidence for meiotic spindle checkpoint from analysis of spermatocytes from Robertsonian-chromosome heterozygous mice. J Cell Sci 114:2953–2965

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassold T, Abruzzo M, Adkins K, Griffin D, Merrill M, Millie E, Saker D, Shen J, Zaragoza M (1996) Human aneuploidy: incidence, origin, and etiology. Environ Mol Mutagen 28:167–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt P, LeMaire R, Embury P, Sheean L, Mroz K (1995) Analysis of chromosome behavior in intact mammalian oocytes: monitoring the segregation of a univalent chromosome during female meiosis. Hum Mol Genet 4:2007–2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs HCAP (1957) The meiotic process in Mantis religiosa L males. J Genet 55:200–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazuki Y, Shinohara T, Tomizuka K, Katoh M, Ohguma A, Ishida I, Oshimura M (2001) Germline transmission of a transferred human chromosome 21 fragment in transchromosomal mice. J Hum Genet 46:600–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler KE, Hawley RS, Sherman S, Hassold T (1996) Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and flies. Hum Mol Genet 5:1495–1504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler KE, Millie EA, Cherry JP, Burgoyne PS, Evans EP, Hunt PA, Hassbold TJ (2002) Sex-specific differences in meiotic chromosome segregation revealed by dicentric bridge resolution in mice. Genetics 162:1367–1379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuroiwa Y, Tomizuka K, Shinohara T, Kazuki Y, Yoshida H, Ohguma A, Yamamoto T, Tanaka S, Oshimura M, Ishida I (2000) Manipulation of human minichromosomes to carry greater than megabase-sized chromosome inserts. Nat Biotechnol 18:1086–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeMaire-Adkins R, Hunt PA (2000) Nonrandom segregation of the mouse univalent X chromosome: evidence of spindle-mediated meiotic drive. Genetics 156:775–783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Murray AW (1991) Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519–531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Nicklas RB (1995) Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373:630–632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevaiah SK, Lovell-Badge R, Burgoyne PS (1993) Tdy-negative XY, XXY and XYY female mice: breeding data and synaptonemal complex analysis. J Reprod Fertil 97:151–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicklas RB, Waters JC, Salmon ED, Ward SC (2001) Checkpoint signals in grasshopper meiosis are sensitive to microtubule attachment, but tension is still essential. J Cell Sci 114:4173–4183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odorisio T, Rodriguez TA, Evans EP, Clarke AR, Burgoyne PS (1998) The meiotic checkpoint monitoring synapsis eliminates spermatocytes via p53-independent apoptosis. Nat Genet 18:257–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Print CG, Loveland KL (2000) Germ cell suicide: new insights into apoptosis. Bioessays 22:423–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen MH, Yang J, Loupart ML, Smith A, Brown W (1997) Human mini-chromosomes in mouse embryonal stem cells. Hum Mol Genet 6:1375–1382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen MH, Mee PJ, Nichols J, Yang J, Brook F, Gardner RL, Smith AG, Brown WRA (2000) A structurally defined mini-chromosome vector for the mouse germ line. Curr Biol 10:31–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shonn MA, McCarroll R, Murray AW (2000) Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289:300–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern BM, Murray AW (2001) Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr Biol 11:1462–1467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka TU, Rachidi N, Janke C, Pereira G, Galova M, Schiebel E, Stark MJ, Nasmyth K (2002) Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108:317–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SS, Hussein D, Wang Y, Elderkin S, Morrow CJ (2001) Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J Cell Sci 114:4385–4395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomizuka K, Yoshida H, Uejima H, Kugoh H, Sato K, Ohguma A, Hayasaka M, Hanaoka K, Oshimura M, Ishida I (1997) Functional expression and germline transmission of a human chromosome fragment in chimaeric mice. Nat Genet 16:133–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomizuka K, Shinohara T, Yoshida H, Uejima H, Ohguma A, Tanaka S, Sato K, Oshimura M, Ishida I (2000) Double trans-chromosomic mice: maintenance of two individual human chromosome fragments containing Ig heavy and kappa loci and expression of fully human antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:722–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voet T, Vermeesch J, Carens A, Durr J, Labaere C, Duhamel H, David G, Marynen P (2001) Efficient male and female germline transmission of a human chromosomal vector in mice. Genome Res 11:124–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath D, Foote S, Hilton A, Brown LG, Beerromero P, Bogan JS, and Page DC (1992) The human Y-chromosome - a 43-interval map based on naturally-occurring deletions. Science 258:52–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Andrew Ross for FISH/immunocytochemistry analysis, Carol Manson and staff for excellent mouse husbandry; and Joanne Povey and Frances Stenhouse for PCR analysis. This project was funded by the Medical Research Council, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Joseph Mee.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Hassold

P.J. Mee and M.M. Shen contributed equally to this article

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mee, P.J., Shen, M.H., Smith, A.G. et al. An unpaired mouse centromere passes consistently through male meiosis and does not significantly compromise spermatogenesis. Chromosoma 112, 183–189 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-003-0260-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-003-0260-6

Keywords

Navigation