Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Visual grading experiments and optimization in CBCT dental implantology imaging: preliminary application of integrated visual grading regression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses a general formulation of integrated visual grading regression (IVGR) and applies it to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan data related to anatomical landmarks for dental implantology. The aim was to assess and predict a minimum acceptable dose for diagnostic imaging and reporting. A skull phantom was imaged with a CBCT unit at various diagnostic exposures. Key anatomical landmarks within the images were independently reviewed by three trained observers. Each provided an overall image quality score. Statistical analysis was carried out to examine the acceptability of the images taken, using an IVGR analysis that was formulized as a three-stage protocol including defining an integrated score, development of an ordinal regression, and investigation of the possibility for dose reduction through estimated parameters. For a unit increase in the logarithm of radiation dose, the odds ratio that the integrated score for an image assessed by observers being rated in a higher category was 3.940 (95% confidence interval: 1.016–15.280). When assessed by the observers, the minimum dose required to achieve a 75% probability for an image to be classified as at least acceptable was 1346.91 mGy·cm2 dose area product (DAP), a 31% reduction compared to the 1962 mGy·cm2 DAP default dosage of the CBCT unit. The kappa values of the intra and inter-observer reliability indicated moderate agreements, while a discrepancy among observers was also identified because each, as expected, perceived visibility differently. The results of this work demonstrate the IVGR’s predictive value of dose saving in the effort to reduce dose to patients while maintaining reportable diagnostic image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALQ:

Anatomical landmark question

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

Az:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

CBCT:

Cone beam computed tomography

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

DAP:

Dose area product

DICOM:

Digital imaging and communications in medicine

EAO:

European Association of Osseointegration

Eq.:

Equation

exp:

Exponential function

FOV:

Field of view

IIQ:

Integrated image quality

IVGR:

Integrated visual grading regression

kVp:

Peak kilovoltage

LF:

Lingual foramen

ln:

Natural logarithm

mA:

Milliampere

MC:

Mandibular canal

MF:

Mental foramen

mGy·cm2 :

Milligray times square centimeter

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

OIQ:

Overall image quality

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

RT:

Right-side

sd:

Standard deviation

SE:

Standard error

VGA:

Visual grading analysis

VGAS:

Visual grading analysis score

VGC:

Visual grading characteristic

VGR:

Visual grading regression

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Al-Humairi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Humairi, A., Ip, R.H.L., Spuur, K. et al. Visual grading experiments and optimization in CBCT dental implantology imaging: preliminary application of integrated visual grading regression. Radiat Environ Biophys 61, 133–145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00959-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00959-x

Keywords

Navigation