Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reply and explanation to Little et al. “Response to: On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose‑rate effects on radiation‑related cancer risks”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 17 August 2021

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beyene J, Moineddin R (2005) Methods for confidence interval estimation of a ratio parameter with application to location quotients. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little MP, Pawel DJ, Abalo K, Hauptmann M (2021) Response to “On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose-rate effects on radiation-related cancer risks” by Walsh et al. Radiat Environ Biophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00935-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore R, Walsh L, Azizova T, Rühm W (2017) Risk of solid cancer in low dose-rate radiation epidemiological studies and the dose-rate effectiveness factor Int. J Radiat Biol 93:1064–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh L, Shore R, Azizova TV, Rühm W (2021) On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose-rate effects on radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Environ Biophys 60(3):493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Science Faculty, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland

    Linda Walsh

  2. Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, USA

    Roy Shore

  3. Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, Ozyorskoe Shosse 19, Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Region, 456780, Russia

    Tamara V. Azizova

  4. Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München- German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany

    Werner Rühm

Authors
  1. Linda Walsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy Shore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tamara V. Azizova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Werner Rühm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Walsh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walsh, L., Shore, R., Azizova, T.V. et al. Reply and explanation to Little et al. “Response to: On the choice of methodology for evaluating dose‑rate effects on radiation‑related cancer risks”. Radiat Environ Biophys 60, 517–518 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00944-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-021-00944-4

Search

Navigation