Advertisement

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 187–192 | Cite as

The role of fluoride and chlorhexidine in preserving hardness and mineralization of enamel and cementum after gamma irradiation

  • Rowida Abdalla
  • Maha A. Niazy
  • Wael E. Jamil
  • Hala A. Hazzaa
  • Amal A. Elbatouti
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 0.05% sodium fluoride and 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwashes on the micro-hardness of tooth enamel and cementum that was exposed to therapeutic doses of gamma radiation. Sixty extracted human teeth were divided into two groups, one was irradiated, the other was not irradiated. The two groups were further subdivided into three subgroups, which were each treated either with 0.05% sodium fluoride or with 0.12% chlorhexidine; the third subgroup served as a control. After demineralization–remineralization cycling, teeth from the irradiated groups showed a significantly lower micro-hardness when compared to those from the non-irradiated groups. Both in the irradiated and non-irradiated groups, teeth from the control subgroups showed a significantly lower micro-hardness, as compared to teeth treated with sodium fluoride and chlorhexidine. For non-irradiated enamel samples, those treated with chlorhexidine showed a significantly less micro-hardness compared to those treated with sodium fluoride. In contrast, irradiated enamel showed no significant difference in micro-hardness, whatever treatment (chlorhexidine or sodium fluoride) was applied. For cementum, treatment with chlorhexidine resulted in a significantly lower micro-hardness compared to sodium fluoride, both for the irradiated and non-irradiated groups. It is concluded that gamma irradiation with therapeutic doses typically used for head and neck carcinoma treatment has a direct effect in reducing micro-hardness of tooth enamel and cementum. Mouthwash protocols including, for example, application of 0.05% sodium fluoride or 0.12% chlorhexidine three times per day for 6 weeks, can protect enamel and cementum against the reduction in hardness and demineralization caused by gamma irradiation. Sodium fluoride offers more protection compared to chlorhexidine.

Keywords

Radiotherapy Enamel Cementum Gamma irradiation 

References

  1. Almqvist H, Lagerlof F (1993) Effect of intermittent delivery of fluoride to Solution on root hard-tissue de- and remineralization measured by absorptiometry. J Dent Res 72:1593–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altenburgera MJ, Klasserc M, Schirrmeistera JF, Hellwiga E (2006) Remineralization of carious enamel lesions after application of a CHX/F-mouthrinse compared with sole CHX- and placebo-application. Oral Health Prev Dent 4:255–263Google Scholar
  3. Andrews N, Griffits C (2001) Dental complications of head and neck radiotherapy. Aus Dent J 46:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attin T, Abouassi T, Becker K, Wiegand A, Roos M, Attin R (2008) A new method for chlorhexidine determination: CHX release after application of differently concentrated CHX-containing preparations on artificial fissures. Clin Oral Investig 12:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bizhang M, Seemann R, Römhild G, Chun YH, Umland N, Lang H, Zimmer S (2007) Effect of a 40% chlorhexidine varnish on demineralization of dentin surfaces in situ. Am J Dent 20:193–197Google Scholar
  6. Brooks SL, Miles DA (1993) Advances in diagnostic imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 37:575–590Google Scholar
  7. Chambers MS, Rosenthal DI, Weber RS (2007) Radiation-induced xerostomia. Head Neck 29:58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dheeraj K, Namrataa R, Sudhir K, Amit S (2011) Oral complications and Its management during radiotherapy. Indian J Dent Sci 4:50–53Google Scholar
  9. El-Faramawy N, Ameen R, El-Haddad K, Maghraby A, El-Zainy M (2011) Effects of gamma radiation on hard dental tissues of albino rats using scanning electron microscope—Part 1. Radiat Eff Defect S 166: 927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Faramawy N, Ameen R, El-Haddad K, El-Zainy M (2013) Effects of gamma radiation on hard dental tissues of albino rats: investigation by light microscopy. Radiat Environ Biophys 52:375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faria KM, Brandao TB, Ribeiro ACP, Vasconcellos AFG, Thiago de Carvalho I, Freire de Arruda F, Junior GC, Gross VC, Almeida OP, Lopes MA, Santos-Silva AR (2014) Micromorphology of the dental pulp is highly preserved in cancer patients who underwent head and neck radiotherapy. J Endod 40:1553–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filion EJ, McClure LA, Huang D, Seng K, Kaplan MJ, Colevas AD, Gomez SL, Chang ET, Le QT (2010) Higher incidence of head and neck cancers among Vietnamese American men in California. Head Neck 32:1336–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fränzel W, Gerlach R, Hein HJ, Schaller HG (2006) Effect of tumor therapeutic irradiation on the mechanical properties of teeth tissue. Z Med Phys 16:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heilman JR, Jordan TH, Warwick R, Wefel JS (1997) Remineralization of root surfaces demineralized in solutions of differing fluoride levels. Caries Res 31:423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu JU, Chen XC, Li YQ, Smales RJ, Yip KH (2005) Radiation-induced root surface caries restored with glass ionomer cement placed in conventional and ART cavity preparations: results at two years. Aus Dent J 50:186–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jansma J, Borggreven JMPM, Driessens FCM, Gravenmade EJ (1990) Effect of X-ray irradiation on the permeability of bovine dental enamel. Caries Res 24:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joyston-Bechal S, Hayes K, Davenport ES, Hardie JM (1992) Caries incidence, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in irradiated patients during a 12-month preventive program using chlorhexidine and fluoride. Caries Res 26:384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Katz S (1982) The use of fluoride and chlorhexidine for the prevention of radiation caries. J Am Dent Assoc 104:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kielbassa AM, Wrbas KT, Schulte-Mönting J, Hellwig E (1999) Correlation of transversal microradiography and microhardness on in situ-induced demineralization in irradiated and non-irradiated human dental enamel. Arch Oral Biol 44:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kielbassa AM, Schendera A, Schulte-Mönting J (2000) Microradiographic and microscopic studies on in situ induced initial caries in irradiated and non-irradiated dental enamel. Caries Res 34:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kielbassa AM, Hellwig E, Meyer-Lueckel H (2006) Effects of Irradiation on in situ remineralization of human and bovine enamel demineralized in vitro. Caries Res 40:130–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Konjhodzic-Prcici A, Keros J, Ajanovic M, Smajkic N, Hasic-Brankovic L (2010) Incidence of radiation caries in patients undergoing radiation therapy in the head and neck region. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr João Pessoa 10:489–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim EK, Choi YC (1998) The preventive effect of chlorhexidine varnish on enamel demineralization. J Korean Acad. Pediatr Dent 25:825–836Google Scholar
  24. Maghraby E, Badr N, Mahmoud E (2005) Effect of γ-radiation on selected mechanical properties of tooth-colored restorative materials. Egypt Dent J 51:805–818Google Scholar
  25. Markitziu A, Weshler Z, Avital M, Gedalia I (1991) Modulatory effect of fluoride and irradiation on rat molar rate of wear. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 34:139–144Google Scholar
  26. Meyerowitz C, Featherstone JD, Billings RJ, Eisenberg AD, Fu J, Shariati M, Zero DT (1991) Use of an intra-oral model to evaluate 0.05% sodium fluoride mouth rinse in radiation-induced hypo salivation. J Dent Res 70:894–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naves LZ, Novais VR, Armstrong SR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Soares CJ (2012) Effect of gamma radiation on bonding to human enamel and dentin. Support Care Cancer 20:2873–2878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodrigues LKA, Jaime AC, Marines N (2004) The effect of gamma radiation on enamel hardness and its resistance to demineralization in vitro. J Oral Sci 46:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Soares CJ, Moura CCG, Soars PB, Naves LZ (2010a) Scanning electric microscopy used to analyze the effect of gamma irradiation on enamel and dentin. Microscopy: science, technology, applications and education microscopy book series. Volume 1. Badajoz, Spain, pp 372–378Google Scholar
  30. Soares CJ, Castro CG, Neiva NA, Soares PV, Santos-Filho PCF, Naves LZ (2010b) Effect of gamma irradiation on ultimate tensile strength of enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 89:159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Souza FRN, Mont LM, Ciesielskil FIN, De Castro AL, Pace G, Gaetti-Jardim E (2009) Influence of preventive protocols on side effects of radiotherapy for treatment of head and neck cancer. Int J Odontostomatol 3:167–172Google Scholar
  32. Tolentino E, Centurion BS, Ferreira LHC, De Souza AP, Damante JH, Rubira-Bullen IRF (2011) Oral adverse effects of head and neck radiotherapy: literature review and suggestion of a clinical oral care guideline for irradiated patients. J Appl Oral Sci 19:448–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toljanic JA, Hagen JC, Takahashi Y, Shapiro RD (1992) Evaluation of the substantivity of a chlorhexidine oral rinse in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:1055–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Strijp AJ, Gerardu VA, Buijs MJ, Van Loveren C, Ten Cate JM (2008) Chlorhexidine efficacy in preventing lesion formation in enamel and dentine An in situ Study. Caries Res 42:460–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verna A, Botta SB, Seino PY, Ana PA, Mathor MB, Matos AB, Oda M (2010) Microhardness evaluation of bovine teeth after gamma radiation sterilization. Dissertation, School of Dentistry University of São PauloGoogle Scholar
  36. Vissink A, Jansma J, Spijkervet FK, Burlage FR, Coppes RP (2003) Oral sequele of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilken R, Veena MS, Wang MB, Srivatsan ES (2011) Curcumin: a review of anti-cancer properties and therapeutic activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer 10:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yokota ET, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE (1994) Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy. J Endodon 20:490–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Restorative Dentistry, Department of Oral Health PracticeUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental MedicineAl-Azhar University, Girls BranchCairoEgypt
  3. 3.Oral medicine, Periodontology, Diagnosis and Radiology DepartmentAl-Azhar University, Girls BranchCairoEgypt
  4. 4.Health Radiation Research DepartmentNational Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT), Atomic Energy AuthorityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations