Advertisement

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 365–379 | Cite as

The risk of leukaemia in young children from exposure to tritium and carbon-14 in the discharges of German nuclear power stations and in the fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing

  • Richard Wakeford
Original Paper

Abstract

Towards the end of 2007, the results were published from a case–control study (the “KiKK Study”) of cancer in young children, diagnosed <5 years of age during 1980–2003 while resident near nuclear power stations in western Germany. The study found a tendency for cases of leukaemia to live closer to the nearest nuclear power station than their matched controls, producing an odds ratio that was raised to a statistically significant extent for residence within 5 km of a nuclear power station. The findings of the study received much publicity, but a detailed radiological risk assessment demonstrated that the radiation doses received by young children from discharges of radioactive material from the nuclear reactors were much lower than those received from natural background radiation and far too small to be responsible for the statistical association reported in the KiKK Study. This has led to speculation that conventional radiological risk assessments have grossly underestimated the risk of leukaemia in young children posed by exposure to man-made radionuclides, and particular attention has been drawn to the possible role of tritium and carbon-14 discharges in this supposedly severe underestimation of risk. Both 3H and 14C are generated naturally in the upper atmosphere, and substantial increases in these radionuclides in the environment occurred as a result of their production by atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons during the late 1950s and early 1960s. If the leukaemogenic effect of these radionuclides has been seriously underestimated to the degree necessary to explain the KiKK Study findings, then a pronounced increase in the worldwide incidence of leukaemia among young children should have followed the notably elevated exposure to 3H and 14C from nuclear weapons testing fallout. To investigate this hypothesis, the time series of incidence rates of leukaemia among young children <5 years of age at diagnosis has been examined from ten cancer registries from three continents and both hemispheres, which include registration data from the early 1960s or before. No evidence of a markedly increased risk of leukaemia in young children following the peak of above-ground nuclear weapons testing, or that incidence rates are related to level of exposure to fallout, is apparent from these registration rates, providing strong grounds for discounting the idea that the risk of leukaemia in young children from 3H or 14C (or any other radionuclide present in both nuclear weapons testing fallout and discharges from nuclear installations) has been grossly underestimated and that such exposure can account for the findings of the KiKK Study.

Keywords

Childhood leukaemia Ionizing radiation Radioactive discharges Nuclear weapons testing fallout Tritium Carbon-14 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The author carries out paid consultancy work, including for the nuclear industry. This paper was not written as part of any consultancy agreement, and no payment has been received by the author for its writing.

References

  1. Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation (AGIR) (2007) Review of Risks of Tritium. Report RCE-4. Health Protection Agency, ChiltonGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison GB, Hughes MW (1977) The history of tritium fallout in southern Australia as inferred from rainfall and wine samples. Earth Planet Sci Lett 36:334–340ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambach W, Eisner H, Sauzay G (1969) Tritium profiles in two firn cores from Alpine glaciers and tritium content in precipitation in the Alpine area. Arch Met Geoph Biokl B 17:93–104Google Scholar
  4. Baglan N, Alanic G, Le Meignen R, Pointurier F (2011) A follow up of the decrease of non exchangeable organically bound tritium levels in the surroundings of a nuclear research centre. J Environ Radioact 102:695–702Google Scholar
  5. Baxter MS, Walton A (1971) Fluctuations of atmospheric carbon-14 concentrations during the past century. Proc R Soc Lond A 321:105–127ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Baxter MS, Ergin M, Walton A (1969) Glasgow University radiocarbon measurements I. Radiocarbon 11:43–52Google Scholar
  7. Belloni P, Clemente GF, di Pietro S, Ingrao G (1983) Tritium levels in blood and urine samples of the members of the Italian general population and some exposed subjects. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 4:109–113Google Scholar
  8. Bennett BG (2002) Worldwide dispersion and deposition of radionuclides produced in atmospheric tests. Health Phys 82:644–655Google Scholar
  9. Bogen DC, Welford GA (1976) “Fallout tritium” distribution in the environment. Health Phys 30:203–208Google Scholar
  10. Bouville A, Simon SL, Miller CW, Beck HL, Anspaugh LR, Bennett BG (2002) Estimates of doses from global fallout. Health Phys 82:690–705Google Scholar
  11. Bowman S (1990) Radiocarbon dating. Interpreting the past. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyer C, Vichot L, Fromm M, Losset Y, Tatin-Froux F, Guétat P, Badot PM (2009) Tritium in plants: a review of current knowledge. Environ Exp Bot 67:34–51Google Scholar
  13. Broecker WS, Walton A (1959) Radiocarbon from nuclear tests. Science 130:309–314ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Broecker WS, Schulert A, Olson EA (1959) Bomb carbon-14 in human beings. Science 130:331–332ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown RM (1979) Environmental tritium in trees. In: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Behaviour of tritium in the environment. STI/PUB/498. IAEA, Vienna, pp 405–418Google Scholar
  16. Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (2007) (BfS, Federal Office for Radiation Protection) Statement by the External BfS Panel of Experts on the KiKK Study (for the Panel of Experts: Greiser E, Jöckel K-H, Hoffmann W, Frankfurt/Main, 10 December 2007) Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Salzgitter http://www.bfs.de/en/kerntechnik/kinderkrebs/Expertengremium.html
  17. Cain WF, Suess HE (1976) Carbon 14 in tree rings. J Geophys Res 81:3688–3694ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) (2010) Health Effects, Dosimetry and Radiological Protection of Tritium. Report INFO-0799. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  19. Chebotina MY, Nikolin OA (2012) The current tritium concentrations in human urine in the area of nuclear fuel cycle facilities. Dokl Biol Sci 447:390–391Google Scholar
  20. Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) (1996) Fourth Report. The incidence of cancer and leukaemia in young people in the vicinity of the Sellafield site, West Cumbria: further studies and an update of the situation since the publication of the report of the Black Advisory Group in 1984. Department of Health, Wetherby, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) (2002) Seventh Report. Parents occupationally exposed to radiation prior to the conception of their children. A review of the evidence concerning the incidence of cancer in their children. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) (2011) Fourteenth Report. Further consideration of the incidence of childhood leukaemia around nuclear power plants in Great Britain. Health Protection Agency, Chilton, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Corbett JO (1983) The radiation dose from coal burning: a review of pathways and data. Radiat Prot Dosim 4:5–19Google Scholar
  24. Crouch D (1986) Science and trans-science in radiation risk assessment: child cancer around the nuclear fuel reprocessing plant at Sellafield, U.K. Sci Total Environ 53:201–216Google Scholar
  25. Cummings KM (1984) Changes in the smoking habits of adults in the United States and recent trends in lung cancer mortality. Cancer Detect Prev 7:125–134Google Scholar
  26. Dai K-M, Qian Y, Fan CY (1992) Bomb-produced 14C in tree rings. Radiocarbon 34:753–756Google Scholar
  27. Doll R (1989) The epidemiology of childhood leukaemia. J R Stat Soc A 152:341–351Google Scholar
  28. Doney SC, Glover DM, Jenkins WJ (1992) A model function of the global bomb tritium distribution in precipitation, 1960–1986. J Geophys Res 97:5481–5492ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Drobinski JC, La Gatta DP, Goldin DS, Terrill JG (1965) Analyses of environmental samples for carbon-14 and tritium. Health Phys 11:385–396Google Scholar
  30. Eriksson E (1965) An account of the major pulses of tritium and their effects in the atmosphere. Tellus 17:118–130ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. Fairlie I (2007) RBE and w R values of Auger emitters and low-range beta emitters with particular reference to tritium. J Radiol Prot 27:157–168Google Scholar
  32. Fairlie I (2008) New evidence of childhood leukaemias near nuclear power stations. Med Confl Surviv 24:219–227Google Scholar
  33. Fairlie I (2009a) Childhood cancers near German nuclear power stations: the ongoing debate. Med Confl Surviv 25:197–205Google Scholar
  34. Fairlie I (2009b) Childhood cancers near German nuclear power stations: hypothesis to explain the cancer increases. Med Confl Surviv 25:206–220Google Scholar
  35. Fairlie I (2009c) Commentary: childhood cancer near nuclear power stations. Environ Health 8:43Google Scholar
  36. Fairlie I (2010a) Hypothesis to explain childhood cancer near nuclear power plants. Int J Occup Environ Health 16:341–450Google Scholar
  37. Fairlie I (2010b) Childhood cancer near German nuclear power stations. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 28:1–21Google Scholar
  38. Fairlie I (2010c) Childhood leukaemia near nuclear installations. Energy and Environment 21:29–47Google Scholar
  39. Fairlie I, Körblein A (2010) Review of epidemiology studies of childhood leukaemia near nuclear facilities: commentary on Laurier. Radiat Prot Dosim 138:194–195Google Scholar
  40. Fischer E, Möller H, Rapp A, Steffan H (1980) Tritium- and carbon-14-contents of wines of different vintage from the northern and southern hemisphere (in German). Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 171:269–271Google Scholar
  41. Fuma S, Inoue Y (1995) Simplified and sensitive analysis of organically bound tritium in tree rings to retrospect environmental tritium levels. Appl Radiat Isot 46:991–997Google Scholar
  42. Galeriu D, Melintescu A (2010) Retention of tritium in reference persons: a metabolic model. Derivation of parameters and application of the model to the general public and to workers. J Radiol Prot 30:445–468Google Scholar
  43. Galeriu D, Melintescu A, Strack S, Atarashi-Andoh M, Kim SB (2013) An overview of organically bound tritium experiments in plants following a short atmospheric HTO exposure. J Environ Radioact 118:40–56Google Scholar
  44. Georgiadou E, Stenström KE, Uvo CB, Nilsson P, Skog G, Mattsson S (2013) Bomb-pulse 14C analysis combined with 13C and 15N measurements in blood serum from residents of Malmö, Sweden. Radiat Environ Biophys 52:175–187Google Scholar
  45. Grosche B, Lackland D, Mohr L, Dunbar J, Nicholas J, Burkart W, Hoel D (1999) Leukaemia in the vicinity of two tritium-releasing nuclear facilities: a comparison of the Kruemmel Site, Germany, and the Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA. J Radiol Prot 19:243–252Google Scholar
  46. Harkness DD, Walton A (1972) Further investigations of the transfer of bomb 14C to man. Nature 240:302–303ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. Harvey M, Oatway W, Smith J, Simmonds J (2008) Implied doses to the population of the EU arising from reported discharges from EU nuclear power stations and reprocessing sites in the years 1997 to 2004. Radiation Protection No. 153. European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  48. Hill AB (1965) The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58:295–300Google Scholar
  49. Hisamatsu S, Takizawa Y, Itoh M, Ueno K, Katsumata T, Sakanoue M (1989) Fallout 3H in human tissue at Akita, Japan. Health Phys 57:559–563Google Scholar
  50. Hisamatsu S, Inoue Y, Takizawa Y (1995) Tritium concentrations of blood samples collected throughout Japan. Health Phys 68:499–502Google Scholar
  51. Hisamatsu S, Amano H, Isogai K, Atarashi M, Zhu H, Takizawa Y (1998) Organically-bound 3H concentration in rice around atomic energy facilities. Health Phys 74:448–450Google Scholar
  52. Hisamatsu S, Inoue Y, Hachiya N, Katoh K, Nakagomi T, Nakagomi O, Motohashi Y, Takizawa Y (2003) Free water 3H concentrations in serum samples collected during 1969–1992 in Akita, Japan. Health Phys 85:204–209Google Scholar
  53. Hoffmann W, Terschueren C, Schill W, Pohlabeln H, Greiser E (2003) The Northern Germany Leukaemia and Lymphoma Study (NLL). Report (Part I): Radioactive Nuclides of Emissions from Nuclear Installations (Main Hypothesis I) (in German). Institute for Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, on behalf of the Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Agriculture of Schleswig-Holstein and the Ministry of Social Affairs, Women, Family Affairs and Health of Lower Saxony. Greifswald, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoffmann W, Terschueren C, Richardson DB (2007) Childhood leukemia in the vicinity of the Geesthacht nuclear establishments near Hamburg, Germany. Environ Health Perspect 115:947–952Google Scholar
  55. Hoffmann W, Terschüeren C, Heimpel H, Feller A, Butte W, Hostrup O, Richardson D, Greiser E (2008) Population-based research on occupational and environmental factors for leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the Northern Germany Leukemia and Lymphoma Study (NLL). Am J Ind Med 51:246–257Google Scholar
  56. Hua Q, Barbetti M, Worbes M, Head J, Levchenko VA (1999) Review of radiocarbon data from atmospheric and tree ring samples for the period 1945–1997 AD. IAWA J 20:261–283Google Scholar
  57. Hua Q, Barbetti M, Zoppi U, Chapman DM, Thomson B (2003) Bomb radiocarbon in tree rings from northern New South Wales, Australia: implications for dendrochronology, atmospheric transport, and air-sea exchange of CO2. Radiocarbon 45:431–447Google Scholar
  58. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (1979) Behaviour of tritium in the environment. STI/PUB/498. IAEA, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  59. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1990) Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: part 1. ICRP Publication 56. Ann ICRP 20(2):1–122Google Scholar
  60. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2–4):1–332Google Scholar
  61. Irlweck K, Teherani DK (1976) Tritium concentration in urine and blood of Austrian residents. Health Phys 30:407–409Google Scholar
  62. Janovics R, Kern Z, Güttler D, Wacker L, Barnabás I, Molnár M (2013) Radiocarbon impact on a nearby tree of a light-water VVER-type nuclear power plant, Paks, Hungary. Radiocarbon 55:826–832Google Scholar
  63. Jean-Baptiste P, Baumier D, Fourré E, Dapoigny A, Clavel B (2007) The distribution of tritium in the terrestrial and aquatic environments of the Creys-Malville nuclear power plant (2002-2005). J Environ Radioact 94:107–118Google Scholar
  64. Kaatsch P, Steliarova-Foucher E, Crocetti E, Magnani C, Spix C, Zambon P (2006) Time trends of cancer incidence in European children (1978–1997): report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer 42:1961–1971Google Scholar
  65. Kaatsch P, Spix C, Jung I, Blettner M (2008a) Childhood leukemia in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int 105:725–732Google Scholar
  66. Kaatsch P, Spix C, Schulze-Rath R, Schmiedel S, Blettner M (2008b) Leukaemia in young children living in the vicinity of German nuclear power plants. Int J Cancer 122:721–726Google Scholar
  67. Kaiser JC, Walsh L (2013) Independent analysis of the radiation risk for leukaemia in children and adults with mortality data (1950–2003) of Japanese A-bomb survivors. Radiat Environ Biophys 52:17–27Google Scholar
  68. Kalin RM, Murphy CE, Hall G (1995) Reconstruction of tritium release history from contaminated ground water using tree ring analysis. Fusion Sci Technol 28:883–887Google Scholar
  69. Kendall GM, Fell TP, Harrison JD (2009) Dose to red bone marrow of infants, children and adults from radiation of natural origin. J Radiol Prot 29:123–138Google Scholar
  70. Kendall GM, Little MP, Wakeford R, Bunch KJ, Miles JC, Vincent TJ, Meara JR, Murphy MF (2013) A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980–2006. Leukemia 27:3–9Google Scholar
  71. Kigoshi K, Tomikura Y (1960) Variation of radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Bull Chem Soc Japan 33:1576–1580Google Scholar
  72. Kigoshi K, Tomikura Y (1961) Tritium and carbon-14 in the tree rings. Bull Chem Soc Japan 34:1738–1739Google Scholar
  73. Kim C-K, Lee S-K, Rho B-H, Lee YG (2000) Environmental distribution and behaviour of 3H and 14C around Wolsong Nuclear Power Plants. Health Phys 78:693–699Google Scholar
  74. Kim SB, Baglan N, Davis PA (2013) Current understanding of organically bound tritium (OBT) in the environment. J Environ Radioact 126C:83–91Google Scholar
  75. König LA (1990) Tritium in the food chain. Radiat Prot Dosim 30:77–86Google Scholar
  76. Kotzer T, Trivedi A (2001) Dosimetric implications of atmospheric dispersal of tritium near a heavy-water research reactor facility. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 93:61–66Google Scholar
  77. Kozák K, Obelić B, Horvatinčić N (1989) Tritium and 14C in tree rings of the last three decades. Radiocarbon 31:766–770Google Scholar
  78. Kozák K, Rank D, Biró T, Rajner V, Golder F, Staudner F (1993) Retrospective evaluation of tritium fallout by tree-ring analysis. J Environ Radioact 19:67–77Google Scholar
  79. Kroll ME, Carpenter LM, Murphy MF, Stiller CA (2012) Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain. Br J Cancer 107:1159–1162Google Scholar
  80. Lane R, Dagher E, Burtt J, Thompson PA (2013) Radiation exposure and cancer incidence (1990 to 2008) around nuclear power plants in Ontario, Canada. J Environ Prot 4:888–913Google Scholar
  81. Le Guen B (2009) Impact of tritium around EDF nuclear power plants. J Radiol Prot 29:163–173Google Scholar
  82. Leprieur F, Linden G, Pasquier JL (2003) The radioecological and health impact of contamination by carbon-14 at a site in Ganagobie (Provence, France) (in French). Radioprotection 38:13–28Google Scholar
  83. Levin I, Münnich KO, Weiss W (1980) The effect of anthropogenic CO2 and 14C sources on the distribution of 14C in the atmosphere. Radiocarbon 22:379–391Google Scholar
  84. Levin I, Kromer B, Schoch-Fischer H, Bruns M, Münnich M, Berdau D, Vogel JC, Münnich KO (1985) 25 years of tropospheric 14C observations in central Europe. Radiocarbon 27:1–19Google Scholar
  85. Levin I, Kromer B, Barabas M, Münnich KO (1988) Environmental distribution and long-term dispersion of reactor 14CO2 around two German nuclear power plants. Health Phys 54:149–156Google Scholar
  86. Libby WF (1958) Radioactive fallout. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 44:800–820ADSGoogle Scholar
  87. Libby WF, Berger R, Mead JF, Alexander GV, Ross JF (1964) Replacement rates for human tissue from atmospheric radiocarbon. Science 146:1170–1172ADSGoogle Scholar
  88. Little MP, Wakeford R, Kendall GM (2009) Updated estimates of the proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionising radiation. J Radiol Prot 29:467–482Google Scholar
  89. Loosli HH, Oeschger H (1989) 14C in the environment of Swiss nuclear installations. Radiocarbon 31:747–753Google Scholar
  90. Love AH, Hunt JR, Knezovich JP (2003) Reconstructing tritium exposure using tree rings at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, California. Environ Sci Technol 37:4330–4335ADSGoogle Scholar
  91. Magnusson A, Stenström K, Skog G, Adliene D, Adlys G, Hellborg R, Olariu A, Zakaria M, Rääf C, Mattsson S (2004) Levels of 14C in the terrestrial environment in the vicinity of two European nuclear power plants. Radiocarbon 46:863–868Google Scholar
  92. Mazeika J, Petrosius R, Pukiene R (2008) Carbon-14 in tree rings and other terrestrial samples in the vicinity of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, Lithuania. J Environ Radioact 99:238–247Google Scholar
  93. Milton GM, Kramer SJ, Brown RM, Repta CJW, King KJ, Rao RR (1995) Radiocarbon dispersion around Canadian nuclear facilities. Radiocarbon 37:485–496Google Scholar
  94. Moghissi AA, Lieberman R (1970) Tritium body burden of children, 1967–1968. Radiol Health Data Rep 11:227–231Google Scholar
  95. Moghissi AA, Lieberman R (1972) Comparison between tritium concentration in drinking water and body water. Health Phys 22:509–511Google Scholar
  96. Moore JB, Noakes JE, Spaulding JD (1993) Environmental monitoring of 14C in milk and agricultural samples. In: Noakes JE, Schonhofer F, Polach HA (eds) Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry 1992. Radiocarbon. The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, pp 447–453Google Scholar
  97. Mundschenk H, Krause WJ (1991) Behaviour and radiological significance of tritium from nuclear power plants and other sources in the Rhine river basin. J Environ Radioact 14:341–360Google Scholar
  98. Murphy CE (1993) Tritium transport and cycling in the environment. Health Phys 65:683–697ADSGoogle Scholar
  99. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) (1979) Tritium in the environment. Report No. 62. NCRP, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  100. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) (1985) Carbon-14 in the environment. Report No. 81. NCRP, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  101. Nishizawa K, Togari A, Matsumoto S, Nagatsu T (1990) Atmospheric nuclear weapon test history as characterized by the deposition of 14C in human teeth. Health Phys 59:179–182Google Scholar
  102. Nussbaum RH (2009) Childhood leukemia and cancers near German nuclear reactors: significance, context, and ramifications of recent studies. Int J Occup Environ Health 15:318–323Google Scholar
  103. Nydal R, Lövseth K, Syrstad O (1971) Bomb 14C in the human population. Nature 232:418–421ADSGoogle Scholar
  104. Otlet RL, Walker AJ, Fulker MJ, Collins C (1997) Background carbon-14 levels in UK foodstuffs, 1981–1995, based upon a 1992 survey. J Environ Radioact 34:91–101Google Scholar
  105. Puhakainen M, Heikkinen T (2008) Tritium in the urine in Finnish people. Radiat Prot Dosim 128:254–257Google Scholar
  106. Rakowski AZ, Nakamura T, Pazdur A (2008) Variations of anthropogenic CO2 in urban area deduced by radiocarbon concentration in modern tree rings. J Environ Radioact 99:1558–1565Google Scholar
  107. Roussel-Debet S (2007) Evaluation of 14C doses since the end of the 1950s in metropolitan France. Radioprotection 42:297–313Google Scholar
  108. Roussel-Debet S, Gontier G, Siclet F, Fournier M (2006) Distribution of carbon 14 in the terrestrial environment close to French nuclear power plants. J Environ Radioact 87:246–259Google Scholar
  109. Schönhofer F (1992) 14C in Austrian wine and vinegar. Radiocarbon 34:768–771Google Scholar
  110. Segl M, Levin I, Schoch-Fischer H, Münnich M, Kromer B, Tschiersch J, Münnich KO (1983) Anthropogenic 14C variations. Radiocarbon 25:583–592Google Scholar
  111. Sermage-Faure C, Laurier D, Goujon-Bellec S, Chartier M, Guyot-Goubin A, Rudant J, Hémon D, Clavel J (2012) Childhood leukemia around French nuclear power plants–the Geocap study, 2002–2007. Int J Cancer 131:E769–E780Google Scholar
  112. Smith JG, Bexon A, Boyer FHC, Harvey M, Jones AL, Kindler T, Mercer J, Haywood SM (2002) Assessment of the radiological impact on the population of the European Union of discharges from European Union nuclear sites between 1987 and 1996. Radiation Protection No. 128. European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  113. Spalding KL, Buchholz BA, Bergman LE, Druid H, Frisén J (2005) Forensics: age written in teeth by nuclear tests. Nature 437:333–334ADSGoogle Scholar
  114. Spix C, Schmiedel S, Kaatsch P, Schulze-Rath R, Blettner M (2008) Case-control study on childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany 1980–2003. Eur J Cancer 44:275–284Google Scholar
  115. Spix C, Kaatsch P, Blettner M (2012) The German and the French studies on childhood leukemia and nuclear power: differences and similarities. Int J Cancer 131:2972–2973Google Scholar
  116. Spycher BD, Feller M, Zwahlen M, Röösli M, von der Weid NX, Hengartner H, Egger M, Kuehni CE, for the Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group and the Swiss National Cohort Study Group (2011) Childhood cancer and nuclear power plants in Switzerland: a census-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 40:1247–1260Google Scholar
  117. Stark S, Statham PJ, Stanley R, Jenkins WJ (2005) Using tree ring cellulose as a tool to estimate past tritium inputs to the ocean. Earth Planet Sci Lett 237:341–353ADSGoogle Scholar
  118. Stenhouse MJ, Baxter MS (1977) Bomb 14C as a biological tracer. Nature 267:828–832ADSGoogle Scholar
  119. Stenström K, Skog G, Thornberg C, Erlandsson B, Hellborg R, Mattsson S, Persson P (1998) 14C levels in the vicinity of two Swedish nuclear power plants and at two “clean-air” sites in southernmost Sweden. Radiocarbon 40:433–438Google Scholar
  120. Stenström K, Skog G, Nilsson CM, Hellborg R, Svegborn SL, Georgiadou E, Mattsson S (2010) Local variations in 14C—how is bomb-pulse dating of human tissues and cells affected? Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res B 268:1299–1302ADSGoogle Scholar
  121. Strahlenschutzkommission (SSK, Commission on Radiological Protection) (2008) Assessment of the “Epidemiological Study on Childhood Cancer in the Vicinity of Nuclear Power Plants” (KiKK Study). Statement of the Commission on Radiological Protection (SSK). Heft 57. H. Hoffmann GmbH—Fachverlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  122. Strahlenschutzkommission (SSK, Commission on Radiological Protection) (2009) Bewertung der epidemiologischen Studie zu Kinderkrebs in der Umgebung von Kernkraftwerken (KiKK-Studie). Wissenschaftliche Begründung zur Stellungnahme der Strahlenschutzkommission. Heft 58. (in German). H. Hoffmann GmbH—Fachverlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  123. Svetlik I, Fejgl M, Turek K, Michalek V, Tomaskova L (2012) 14C studies in the vicinity of the Czech NPPs. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292:689–695Google Scholar
  124. Tans PP, de Jong AFM, Mook WG (1979) Natural atmospheric 14C variation and the Suess effect. Nature 280:826–828ADSGoogle Scholar
  125. Travis CC, Etnier EL, Hetrick DM (1984) Validation of a metabolic model for tritium. Radiat Res 100:503–509Google Scholar
  126. Uchrin G, Csaba E, Hertelendi E, Ormai P, Barnabas I (1992) 14C release from a Soviet-designed pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant. Health Phys 63:651–655Google Scholar
  127. Ujeno Y, Yamamoto K, Aoki T, Kurihara N (1986) Tritium content in tissue free water of Japanese bodies. Radiat Prot Dosim 16:181–183Google Scholar
  128. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. Volume I: Sources. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  129. Vichot L, Boyer C, Boissieux T, Losset Y, Pierrat D (2008) Organically bound tritium (OBT) for various plants in the vicinity of a continuous atmospheric tritium release. J Environ Radioact 99:1636–1643Google Scholar
  130. Vokal B, Kobal I (1997) Radiocarbon releases at the Krško nuclear power plant. Radiocarbon 39:285–292Google Scholar
  131. Wakeford R (2008) Childhood leukaemia following medical diagnostic exposure to ionizing radiation in utero or after birth. Radiat Prot Dosim 132:166–174Google Scholar
  132. Wakeford R (2013) The risk of childhood leukaemia following exposure to ionising radiation—a review. J Radiol Prot 33:1–25Google Scholar
  133. Wakeford R, Kendall GM, Little MP (2009) The proportion of childhood leukaemia incidence in Great Britain that may be caused by natural background ionizing radiation. Leukemia 23:770–776Google Scholar
  134. Wakeford R, Murphy MF, Darby SC (2010) Temporal trends in childhood leukaemia incidence following exposure to radioactive fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Radiat Environ Biophys 49:213–227Google Scholar
  135. Wang Z, Xiang Y, Guo Q (2012) 14C levels in tree rings located near Qinshan Nuclear Power Plant, China. Radiocarbon 54:195–202Google Scholar
  136. Wiechen A (1974) Determination of tritium in milk and surface water from the immediate surroundings of a nuclear power plant in the North of Germany (in German). Milchwissenschaft 29:346–348Google Scholar
  137. Williams J, Russ R, McCubbin D, Knowles J (2001) An overview of tritium behaviour in the Severn Estuary (UK). J Radiol Prot 21:337–344Google Scholar
  138. Wilson AT (1961) Carbon-14 from nuclear explosions as a short-term dating system: use to determine the origin of heartwood. Nature 191:714ADSGoogle Scholar
  139. Wing S, Richardson DB, Hoffmann W (2011) Cancer risks near nuclear facilities: the importance of research design and explicit study hypotheses. Environ Health Perspect 119:417–421Google Scholar
  140. Yamada Y, Itoh M, Kiriyama N, Komura K, Ueno K (1989) Measurement of tritium in tree rings: relationship between tritium concentrations in pine tree rings and environmental samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 132:59–64Google Scholar
  141. Yamada Y, Yasuike K, Komura K (2004) Temporal variation of tritium concentration in tree-ring cellulose over the past 50 years. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 262:679–683Google Scholar
  142. Yoon S, Ha WH, Lee SS (2013) Tritium analysis of urine samples from the general Korean public. Appl Radiat Isot 81:276–278Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Institute of Population HealthThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations