Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 747–748 | Cite as

Reply to letter by Jargin on “overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: poorly substantiated information published”

Letter to the Editor


  1. Alexievich S (2006) Voices from Chernobyl: the oral history of a nuclear disaster. Picador, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. IAEA (2006) Chernobyl’s legacy: health, environmental and socio-economic impacts and recommendations to the governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. IAEA, Vienna, p 57Google Scholar
  3. Jargin SJ (2010) Overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: poorly substantiated information published. Radiat Environ Biopsy, this issue. doi:10.1007/s00411-010-0313-1
  4. Kasandrova DN, Lebedev VV (1970) Obrabotka rezul’tatov nablyudenii. Nauka, MoskvaGoogle Scholar
  5. National Report of the Republic of Belarus (2006) 20 Years after the Chernobyl Accident Consequences in the Republic of Belarus and their overcoming, Comchernobyl, Minsk, pp 28–42. http://www.chernobyl.gov.by/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=344&Itemid=107
  6. New York Academy of Sciences (2009) Chernobyl: consequences of the catastrophe for people and the environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, p 1181Google Scholar
  7. The Law of the Republic of Belarus (2001) On social protection of citizens, injured from catastrophe on Chernobyl NPP. No. 31–3, Article 3. http://www.chernobyl.gov.by/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=405&Itemid=153
  8. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly. Annex. J Expo Effects Chernobyl Accident (United Nations, New York)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Radioprotection “Belrad”MinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations