Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 373–378 | Cite as

Radiation damage in charge-coupled devices

Original Paper


Due to their high sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio, charge-coupled devices (CCDs) have been the preferred optical photon detectors of astronomers for several decades. CCDs are flown in space as the main detection instrument on several well-known missions, such as the Hubble Space Telescope, XMM-Newton or the Cassini Probe. Also, CCDs are frequently used in satellite star trackers which provide attitude information to the satellite orientation system. However, one major drawback is their extreme vulnerability to radiation, which is readily abundant in space. Here, we shall give a brief overview of the radiation effects on CCDs, and mention ways how to mitigate the effects in other ways than merely increase shielding, such as cooling and annealing. As an example, we have investigated the radiation hardness of a particular CCD, the so-called CCD47-20 from Marconi Applied Technologies (now E2V), by exposing it to radiation fields representing the radiation environment found in a highly elliptic orbit crossing the Van-Allen radiation belts. Two engineering-grade CCDs were irradiated with proton beams and photons, and effects of increased bulk dark current, surface dark current and inversion threshold voltage shifts were observed and are quantified.


  1. Christensen-Dalsgaard J (2002) MONS on the Danish Rømer satellite: measuring oscillations in nearby stars. In: Battrick B, Favata F, Roxburgh IW, Galadi D (eds) Stellar structure and habitable planet finding, vol 485 of ESA Special Publication, pp 25–34Google Scholar
  2. Heynderickx D, Quaghebeur B, Evans HDR (2002) The ESA Space Environment Information System (SPENVIS). In: IAF abstracts, 34th COSPAR Scientific AssemblyGoogle Scholar
  3. Dale C, Marshall P, Cummings B, Shamey L, Holland A (1993) Displacement damage effects in mixed particle environments for shielded spacecraft CCDs. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 40(6):1628–1637Google Scholar
  4. Janesick JR (2001) Scientific charge-coupled devices. SPIE press, BellinghanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Janesick J, Elliott T (1992) Astronomical CCD observing and reduction techniques. In: Howell SB (eds) Astronomical CCD observing and reduction techniques, vol 23 of ASP Conference SeriesGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassler N (2002) Radiation damage in scientific charge-coupled devices. Master’s thesis, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus Univeristy, Århus, Denmark. http://neptun.phys.au.dk/~bassler/THESIS/
  7. Janesick J, Soli G, Elliot T, Collins S (1991) The effects of proton damage on charge-coupled devices. SPIE 1447:87–108CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Hopkinson GR, Dale CJ, Marshall PW (1996) Proton effects in charge-coupled devices. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 43(2):614–627CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Hopkinson GR (1991) Space radiation effects on CCDs. In: Proceedings of the ESA electronic components conference, vol ESA SP-313, pp 301–306Google Scholar
  10. Smith DR, Holland AD, Hutchinson IB (2004) Random telegraph signals in charge coupled devices. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 530:521–535CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of AarhusÅrhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations