Skip to main content
Log in

Description of light ion production cross sections and fluxes on the Mars surface using the QMSFRG model

  • Proceedings of the 4th IWSRR
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The atmosphere of Mars significantly attenuates the heavy ion component of the primary galactic cosmic rays (GCR), however, increases the fluence of secondary light ions (neutrons, and hydrogen and helium isotopes) because of particle production processes. We describe results of the quantum multiple scattering fragmentation (QMSFRG) model for the production of light nuclei through the distinct mechanisms of nuclear abrasion and ablation, coalescence, and cluster knockout. The QMSFRG model is shown to be in excellent agreement with available experimental data for nuclear fragmentation cross sections. We use the QMSFRG model and the space radiation transport code, HZETRN to make predictions of the light particle environment on the Martian surface at solar minimum and near maximum. The radiation assessment detector (RAD) experiment will be launched in 2009 as part of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL). We make predictions of the expected results for time dependent count-rates to be observed by the RAD experiment. Finally, we consider sensitivity assessments of the impact of the Martian atmospheric composition on particle fluxes at the surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cucinotta FA, Durante M (2006) Cancer risks from exposures to galactic cosmic rays: implications for space exploration by human beings. Lancet Oncol 7:431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cucinotta FA, Schimmerling W, Wilson JW, Peterson LE, Badhwar GD, Saganti P, Dicello JF (2001) Space radiation cancer risks and uncertainties for Mars missions. Radiat Res 156:682–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saganti PB, Cucinotta FA, Wilson JW, Simonsen LC, Zeitlin CJ (2004) Radiation climate map for analyzing risks to astronauts on the Mars surface from galactic cosmic rays. Space Sci Rev 110:143–156

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Badhwar GB, Cucinotta FA, O’Neill PM (1994) An analysis of interplanetary space radiation exposure for various solar cycles. Radiat Res 138:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clowdsley M, Wilson JW, Kim MH, Singleterry RC, Tripathi, RK, Heinbockel JH, Badavi FF, Shinn JL (2001) Neutron environments on the Martian surface. Phys Medica XVII:94–96

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cucinotta FA, Townsend LW, Wilson JW (1992) Production of 3H at large momentum in α-12C collisions at 2A GeV. Phys Lett 282B:1–6

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cucinotta FA, Townsend LW, Wilson JW (1992) Multiple scattering effects in quasi-elastic α-4He scattering. Phys Rev C 46:1451–1456

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cucinotta FA, Dubey RR (1994) Alpha cluster description of excitation energies in 12C (12C, 3 α) X at 2.1 GeV. Phys Rev C 50:979–984

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cucinotta FA et al (1997) Computational procedures and data-base development. In: Wilson JW, Miller J, Konradi A, Cucinotta FA (eds) NASA workshop on shielding strategies for human space exploration. NASA CP-3360

  10. Cucinotta FA, Wilson JW, Townsend LW (1997) Abrasion–ablation model for neutron production in heavy ion collisions. Nucl Phys A 619:202–212

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Campi X, Hufner J (1981) Nuclear spallation–fragmentation reactions induced by high-energy projectiles. Phys Rev C 24:2199–2209

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cucinotta FA (1994) Forward production of protons in relativistic 12C-nucleus collisions. J Phys G Nucl Part Phys 20:1803–1815

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leupold S, Heinz U (1994) Coalescence model for deuterons and anti-deuterons in relativistic heavy–heavy ion collisions. Phys Rev C50:1110–1128

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson JW, Badavi FF (1986) Methods of galactic heavy ion transport. Radiat Res 108:231–237

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson JW, Townsend LW, Schimmerling W, Khandelwal GS, Khan F, Nealy JE, Cucinotta FA, Simonsen LC, Shinn JL, Norbury JW (1991) Transport methods and interactions for space radiations. NASA RP-1257

  16. Cucinotta FA, Wilson JW, Saganti P, Hu X, Kim MY, Cleghorn T, Zeitlin C, Tripathi RK (2006) Isotopic dependence of GCR fluence behind shielding. Radiat Meas 41:1235–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zeitlin C, Fukumura A, Guetersloh SB, Heilbronn LH, Iwata Y, Miller J, Murakami T (2006) Fragmentation cross sections of 28Si at beam energies from 290 A to 1200 A MeV. Nucl Phys A (in press)

  18. Olsen DL, Berman BL, Greiner DE, Heckman HH, Lindstrom PJ, Crawford HJ (1981) Factorization of fragment-production cross sections in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Phys Rev C28:1602–1613

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krasnopolsky VA, Maillard JP, Owen TC (2004) Detection of methane in the martian atmosphere: evidence for life? Icarus 172:537–547

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Formisano V, Atreya S, Encrenaz T, Ignatiev N, Giuranna M (2004) Detection of methane in the atmosphere of Mars. Science 306:1758–1761

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was sponsored, in-part, by the NASA Exploration Systems Management Directorates Space Radiation Research Programs Radiation Risk Assessment (F.A. Cucinotta) and Mars Science Laboratory Awards (D. Hassler).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis A. Cucinotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cucinotta, F.A., Kim, MH., Schneider, S.I. et al. Description of light ion production cross sections and fluxes on the Mars surface using the QMSFRG model. Radiat Environ Biophys 46, 101–106 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-007-0099-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-007-0099-y

Keywords

Navigation