Skip to main content
Log in

Low levels of clustered oxidative DNA damage induced at low and high LET irradiation in mammalian cells

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and locally multiply damaged sites (LMDS) induced by ionizing radiation (IR) are considered to be very genotoxic in mammalian cells. LMDS consist of two or more clustered DNA lesions including oxidative damage locally formed within one or two helical turns by single radiation tracks following local energy deposition. They are thought to be frequently induced by IR but not by normal oxidative metabolism. In mammalian cells, LMDS are detected after specific enzymatic treatments transforming these lesions into additional DSBs that can be revealed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Here, we studied radiation-induced DSBs and LMDS in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1). After addition of the iron chelator deferoxamine (DFO) or the antioxidant glutathione (GSH) to the cell lysis solution, we observed reduced spontaneous DNA fragmentation and a clear dose-dependent increase of radiation-induced DSBs. LMDS induction, however, was close to background levels, independently of dose, dose rate, temperature and radiation quality (low and high LET). Under these experimental conditions, artefactual oxidative DNA damage during cell lysis could not anymore be confounded with LMDS. We thus show that radiation-induced LMDS composed of oxidized purines or pyrimidines are much less frequent than hitherto reported, and suggest that they may be of minor importance in the radiation response than DSBs. We speculate that complex DSBs with oxidized ends may constitute the main part of radiation-induced clustered lesions. However, this needs further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ward JF (1988) DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 35:95–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett PV, Cuomo NL, Paul S, Tafrov ST, Sutherland BM (2005) Endogenous DNA damage clusters in human skin, 3-D model, and cultured skin cells. Free Radic Biol Med 39:832–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodhead DT (1994) Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. Int J Radiat Biol 65:7–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Terrissol M, Goodhead DT (1999) Quantitative modelling of DNA damage using Monte Carlo track structure method. Radiat Environ Biophys 38:31–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Wilson WE, Goodhead DT (2001) Computational approach for determining the spectrum of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 156:577–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutherland BM, Bennett PV, Sidorkina O, Laval J (2000a) Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:103–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutherland BM, Bennett PV, Sidorkina O, Laval J (2000b) Clustered damages and total lesions induced in DNA by ionizing radiation: oxidized bases and strand breaks. Biochemistry 39:8026–8031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutherland BM, Bennett PV, Sutherland JC, Laval J (2002) Clustered DNA damages induced by X rays in human cells. Radiat Res 157:611–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulston M, Fulford J, Jenner T, Lara CD, O’Neill P (2002) Clustered DNA damage induced by gamma radiation in human fibroblasts (HF19), hamster (V79–4) cells and plasmid DNA is revealed as Fpg and Nth sensitive sites. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3464–3472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blaisdell JO, Wallace SS (2001) Abortive base-excision repair of radiation-induced clustered DNA lesions in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7426–7430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearson CG, Shikazono N, Thacker J, O’Neill P (2004) Enhanced mutagenic potential of 8-oxo−7,8-dihydroguanine when present within a clustered DNA damage site. Nucleic Acids Res 32:263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eot-Houllier G, Eon-Marchais S, Gasparutto D, Sage E (2005) Processing of a complex multiply damaged DNA site by human cell extracts and purified repair proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 33:260–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang N, Chaudhry MA, Wallace SS (2006) Base excision repair by hNTH1 and hOGG1: a two edged sword in the processing of DNA damage in gamma-irradiated human cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 5:43–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cadet J, D’Ham C, Douki T, Pouget JP, Ravanat JL, Sauvaigo S (1998) Facts and artifacts in the measurement of oxidative base damage to DNA. Free Radic Res 29:541–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cadet J, Bourdat AG, D’Ham C, Duarte V, Gasparutto D, Romieu A, Ravanat JL (2000) Oxidative base damage to DNA: specificity of base excision repair enzymes. Mutat Res 462:121–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cadet J, Douki T, Frelon S, Sauvaigo S, Pouget JP, Ravanat JL (2002) Assessment of oxidative base damage to isolated and cellular DNA by HPLC–MS/MS measurement. Free Radic Biol Med 33:441–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ESCODD (2002) Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: an approach to consensus. Carcinogenesis 23:2129–2133

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dhermain F, Dardalhon M, Queinnec E, Averbeck D (1995) Induction of double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster ovary cells at two different dose rates of gamma-irradiation. Mutat Res 336:161–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunderson K, Chu G (1991) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of megabase-sized DNA. Mol Cell Biol 11:3348–3354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Henle ES, Luo Y, Linn S (1996) Fe2+, Fe3+, and oxygen react with DNA-derived radicals formed during iron-mediated Fenton reactions. Biochemistry 35:12212–12219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sies H (1999) Glutathione and its role in cellular functions. Free Radic Biol Med 27:916–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas JA, Poland B, Honzatko R (1995) Protein sulfhydryls and their role in the antioxidant function of protein S-thiolation. Arch Biochem Biophys 319:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pouget JP, Douki T, Richard MJ, Cadet J (2000) DNA damage induced in cells by gamma and UVA radiation as measured by HPLC/GC–MS and HPLC–EC and Comet assay. Chem Res Toxicol 13:541–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pouget JP, Ravanat JL, Douki T, Richard MJ, Cadet J (1999) Measurement of DNA base damage in cells exposed to low doses of gamma-radiation : comparison between the HPLC–EC and Comet assay. Int J Radiat Biol 75:51–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Blöcher D, Einspenner M, Zajackowski J (1989) CHEF electrophoresis, a sensitive technique for the determination of DNA double-strand breaks. Int J Radiat Biol 56:437–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burkart W, Jung T, Frasch G (1999) Damage pattern as a function of radiation quality and other factors. C R Acad Sci III 322:89–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pouget JP, Frelon S, Ravanat JL, Testard I, Odin F, Cadet J (2002) Formation of modified DNA bases in cells exposed either to gamma radiation or to high-LET particles. Radiat Res 157:589–595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Boucher D, Hindo J, Averbeck D (2004) Increased repair of gamma-induced DNA double-strand breaks at lower dose-rate in CHO cells. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 82:125–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dikomey E, Brammer I (2000) Relationship between cellular radiosensitivity and non-repaired double-strand breaks studied for different growth states, dose rates and plating conditions in a normal human fibroblast line. Int J Radiat Biol 76:773–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Goodhead DT, Terrissol M (1997) Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events. Int J Radiat Biol 71:467–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. David-Cordonnier MH, Laval J, O’Neill P (2001) Recognition and kinetics for a base lesion within clustered DNA damage by the Escherichia coli proteins Fpg and Nth. Biochemistry 40:5738–5746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuhne M, Rothkamm K, Lobrich M (2002) Physical and biological parameters affecting DNA double strand break misrejoining in mammalian cells. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 99:129–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lobrich M, Cooper PK, Rydberg B (1998) Joining of correct and incorrect DNA ends at double-strand breaks produced by high-linear energy transfer radiation in human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 150:619–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stenerlow B, Hoglund E (2002) Rejoining of double-stranded DNA-fragments studied in different size-intervals. Int J Radiat Biol 78:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pinto M, Prise KM, Michael BD (2005) Evidence for complexity at the nanometer scale of radiation-induced DNA DSBs as a determinant of rejoining kinetics. Radiat Res 164:73–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lobrich M, Jeggo PA (2005) The two edges of the ATM sword: co-operation between repair and checkpoint functions. Radiother Oncol 76:112–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Leatherbarrow EL, Harper JV, Cucinotta FA, O’Neill P (2006) Induction and quantification of gamma-H2AX foci following low and high LET-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 82:111–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stenerlow B, Karlsson KH, Cooper B, Rydberg B (2003) Measurement of prompt DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells without including heat-labile sites: results for cells deficient in nonhomologous end joining. Radiat Res 159:502–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lundin C, North M, Erixon K, Walters K, Jenssen D, Goldman AS, Helleday T (2005) Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 33:3799–3811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from Electricité de France (EDF). The authors are grateful to Penny Jeggo (MRC Cell Mutation Unit, Falmer, Brighton, UK) for kindly providing the Chinese Hamster Ovary cell line, Serge Boiteux (CEA Fontenay-aux-Roses, France) and Murat Saparbaev (Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) for kindly providing Fpg, Nth and Nfo enzymes. The authors are also indebted to Evelyne Sage, Michele Dardalhon and Yannick Saintigny for valuable suggestions. Didier Boucher acknowledges a doctoral grant by Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales and Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (DSV), France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietrich Averbeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boucher, D., Testard, I. & Averbeck, D. Low levels of clustered oxidative DNA damage induced at low and high LET irradiation in mammalian cells. Radiat Environ Biophys 45, 267–276 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0070-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0070-3

Keywords

Navigation