Advertisement

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 153–157 | Cite as

Comparison of dose conversion factors for radon progeny from the ICRP 66 regional model and an airway tube model of tracheo-bronchial tree

  • D. Nikezic
  • B. M. F. Lau
  • K. N. YuEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

Current epidemiological approaches to radon dosimetry yield a dose conversion factor (DCF) of 4 mSv WLM−1 while the dosimetric approaches give a value closer to 13 mSv WLM−1. The present study investigated whether the application of compartment models for the bronchial (BB) and bronchiolar (bb) regions, rather than more anatomically realistic airway tube models, has brought the dosimetric DCF to the higher values. The airway tube model of the tracheo-bronchial tree was used to calculate the effective dose per unit radon exposure. All other elements of the human respiratory tract from the reports of the ICRP or NRC were adopted. A dosimetric derivation of the radon DCF using the airway tube model yielded a value of 14.2 mSv WLM−1. This value is slightly larger than, but not significantly different from, the result obtained through the ICRP 66 approach. It is concluded that utilization of the airway tube model instead of the regional ICRP 66 compartmental model cannot reconcile the gap between dose conversion factors derived from epidemiological and dosimetric approaches.

Keywords

Radon Epidemiological Approach Equilibrium Activity Radon Progeny Dose Conversion Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present research is supported by the CERG grant CityU1004/99P from the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong.

References

  1. 1.
    ICRP (1994) Human respiratory tract model for radiological protection. A report of a Task Group of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 66. Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, vol 24. Pergamon, New York, pp 1–459Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICRP (1994a) Protection Against Radon-222 at Home and at Work. ICRP Publication 65. Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Pergamon, New York, p 23Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marsh JW, Birchall A (2000) Sensitivity analysis of the weighted equivalent lung dose per unit exposure from radon progeny. Radiat Prot Dosim 87:167–178Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marsh JW, Birchall A, Butterweck G, Dorrian MD, Huet C, Ortega X, Reineking A, Tyemen G, Schuler CH, Vargas A, Vezzu G, Wendt J (2003) Uncertainty analysis of the weighted equivalent lung dose per unit exposure to radon progeny in the home. Radiat Prot Dosim 102:229–248Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu KN, Lau BMF, Nikezic D (2006) Assessment of environmental radon hazard using human respiratory tract models. J Hazard Mater 132:98–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    NRC (1991) Comparative dosimetry of radon in mines and homes. Panel on dosimetric assumption affecting the application of radon risk estimates. National Research Council. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ingham DB (1975) Diffusion of aerosols from a stream flowing through a cylindrical tube. J Aerosol Sci 6:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gurman JL, Lippmann M, Schlesinger RB (1984) Particle deposition in replicate casts of the human upper tracheobronchial tree under constant and cyclic inspiratory flow. I. Experimental. Aerosol Sci Technol 3:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Egan MJ, Nixon W, Robinson NI, James AC, Phalen RF (1989) Inhaled aerosol transport and deposition calculations for the ICRP Task Group. J Aerosol Sci 20:1301–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang IY, Griffith WC, Shyr LJ, Yeh HC, Cuddihy RG, Seiler FA (1991) Software for the draft NCRP respiratory tract dosimetry model. Radiat Prot Dosim 38:193–199Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Booker AF, Chamberlain AC, Newton D, Stott ANB (1969) Uptake of radioactive lead following inhalation and injection. Br J Radiol 42:457–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greenhalgh JR, Birchall A, James AC, Smith H, Hodgson A. (1982) Differential retention of 212Pb ions and insoluble particles in nasal mucosa of the rat. Med Biol 27:837–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nikezic D, Haque AKMM, Yu KN (2002) Absorbed dose delivered by alpha particles calculated in cylindrical geometry. J Environ Radioact 60:293–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of KragujevacKragujevacSerbia and Montenegro
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Materials ScienceCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong Kong, China

Personalised recommendations