Skip to main content

Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics volume 44, pages 253–256 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

The possible cancer risks caused by ionizing radiation doses of ~1 mSv or less are too small to be estimated directly from epidemiological data. The linear no-threshold (LNT) approach to estimating such risks involves using epidemiological data at higher (but still low) doses to establish an “anchor point”, and then extrapolating the excess cancer risk linearly down from this point to the low dose of interest. The study in this issue by Professor Tubiana and colleagues, summarizing a French Academy of Sciences report, argues that such LNT extrapolations systematically give substantial overestimates of the excess cancer risk at very low doses. We suggest that, to the contrary, even if there are significant deviations from linearity in the relevant dose range, potentially caused by the effects of inter-cellular interactions or immune surveillance, we know almost nothing quantitatively about these effects. Consequently, we do not know the magnitude, nor even the direction of any such deviations from linearity—the risks could indeed be lower than those predicted by a linear extrapolation, but they could well be higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Masse R (2006) Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose–effect relationship. Radiat Environ Biophys 44. DOI 10.1007/s00411-006-0032-9

  2. Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Bonnin A, Le Guen B, Masse R, Monier R, Valleron AJ, de Vathaire F (2005) Dose–effect relationships and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation. Institut de France Académie des Sciences, Paris. (www.academie-sciences.fr/publications/rapports/pdf/dose_effet_07_04_05_gb.pdf)

  3. Rossi HH, Kellerer AM (1972) Radiation carcinogenesis at low doses. Science 175:200–202

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaider M (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13761–13766

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mole RH (1990) Childhood cancer after prenatal exposure to diagnostic X-ray examinations in Britain. Br J Cancer 62:152–168

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coppola M, Eickel R, Fitzgerald M, Pirrwitz D, Porro F, Booz J (1976) Experimental evaluation of the spectral energy deposition in small volumes by low-LET radiations. In: Booz J, Ebert HG, Smith BGR (eds) Proceedings, Fifth Symposium on Microdosimetry. CEC, Luxembourg

  7. Doll R, Wakeford R (1997) Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Br J Radiol 70:130–139

    Google Scholar 

  8. Folkman J (2003) Fundamental concepts of the angiogenic process. Curr Mol Med 3:643–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhowmick NA, Moses HL (2005) Tumor–stroma interactions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15:97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barcellos-Hoff MH (2005) Integrative radiation carcinogenesis: interactions between cell and tissue responses to DNA damage. Semin Cancer Biol 15:138–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brenner DJ, Little JB, Sachs RK (2001) The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis: II. A quantitative model. Radiat Res 155:402–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Black WC, Welch HG (1993) Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy. N Engl J Med 328:1237–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonmassar E, Menconi E, Goldin A, Cudkowicz G (1974) Escape of small numbers of allogeneic lymphoma cells from immune surveillance. J Natl Cancer Inst 53:475–479

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Boer RJ, Hogeweg P (1985) Tumor escape from immune elimination: simplified precursor bound cytotoxicity models. J Theor Biol 113:719–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sachs RK, Chan M, Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P (2005) Modeling intercellular interactions during carcinogenesis. Radiat Res 164:324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Research Council of the National Academies (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation—BEIR VII. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 W. 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA

    David J. Brenner

  2. Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA

    Rainer K. Sachs

Authors
  1. David J. Brenner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rainer K. Sachs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Brenner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brenner, D.J., Sachs, R.K. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach. Radiat Environ Biophys 44, 253–256 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0029-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-006-0029-4

Keywords

  • Cancer Risk
  • Childhood Cancer
  • Increase Cancer Risk
  • Ionize Radiation Dose
  • Excess Cancer Risk