Skip to main content
Log in

U–Pb isotopic dating of titanite microstructures: potential implications for the chronology and identification of large impact structures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identifying and dating large impact structures is challenging, as many of the traditional shock indicator phases can be modified by post-impact processes. Refractory accessory phases, such as zircon, while faithful recorders of shock wave passage, commonly respond with partial U–Pb age resetting during impact events. Titanite is an accessory phase with lower Pb closure temperature than many other robust chronometers, but its potential as indicator and chronometer of impact-related processes remains poorly constrained. In this study, we examined titanite grains from the Sudbury (Ontario, Canada) and Vredefort (South Africa) impact structures, combining quantitative microstructural and U–Pb dating techniques. Titanite grains from both craters host planar microstructures and microtwins that show a common twin–host disorientation relationship of 74° about <102>. In the Vredefort impact structure, the microtwins deformed internally and developed high- and low-angle grain boundaries that resulted in the growth of neoblastic crystallites. U–Pb isotopic dating of magmatic titanite grains with deformation microtwins from the Sudbury impact structure yielded a 207Pb/206Pb age of 1851 ± 12 Ma that records either the shock heating or the crater modification stage of the impact event. The titanite grains from the Vredefort impact structure yielded primarily pre-impact ages recording the cooling of the ultra-high-temperature Ventersdorp event, but domains with microtwins or planar microstructures show evidence of U–Pb isotopic disturbance. Despite that the identified microtwins are not diagnostic of shock-metamorphic processes, our contribution demonstrates that titanite has great potential to inform studies of the terrestrial impact crater record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

K.P acknowledges a Ph.D. studentship from the University of Portsmouth. Vale is acknowledged for access to drillcore material. Vale geologists Lisa Gibson, Colin Mecke, Clarence Pickett, and Rob Pelkey are thanked for the provided information and feedback. J.D acknowledges Higher Education Innovation Fund and Researcher Development Fund grant from the University of Portsmouth. Constructive and insightful reviews by Timmons Erickson and an anonymous reviewer enhanced the manuscript and are greatly appreciated. The previous reviews by Nick Timms, Chloe Bonamici, Fred Jourdan, and Elizaveta Kovaleva are also greatly appreciated as well as editorial handling by Steven Reddy. Personal communication with Mark Biren regarding unpublished data from the Manicouagan impact crater is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Papapavlou.

Additional information

Communicated by Timothy L. Grove.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papapavlou, K., Darling, J.R., Moser, D.E. et al. U–Pb isotopic dating of titanite microstructures: potential implications for the chronology and identification of large impact structures. Contrib Mineral Petrol 173, 82 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-018-1511-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-018-1511-0

Keywords

Navigation