Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 146, Issue 6, pp 657–670 | Cite as

Can metamorphic reactions proceed faster than bulk strain?

Original Paper


Available constraints on metamorphic reaction rates derived from the study of natural systems are similar to, or slightly lower than, the bulk strain rates measured in the same rocks. Here, we explore whether this apparent relationship is merely coincidence or due to a more fundamental mechanistic link between reaction and strain. Grain boundary migration accommodated dislocation creep (GBMDC) or grain boundary diffusion creep (GBDC) (i.e. pressure solution), both of which involve dissolution-precipitation as we define it, will occur simultaneously with mineral reactions involving dissolution-precipitation in the presence of a non-zero deviatoric stress. The exact relationships between reaction and strain are different depending on whether GBMDC or GBDC is controlling strain, but the mechanistic link exists in both cases. We present theoretical arguments which show that bulk strain by GBMDC or GBDC, which may additionally be accommodated by processes not involving dissolution-precipitation, such as dislocation glide and climb or grain boundary sliding, should in most cases be somewhat faster than the bulk reaction rates as observed. With few exceptions, for natural metamorphic systems undergoing plastic deformation, strain rates provide an upper limit for bulk reaction rates occurring simultaneously in the same rocks. The data suggest that mineral reaction rates may typically be within one order of magnitude of the strain rate.


  1. Baxter EF (2003) Natural constraints on metamorphic reaction rates. In: Vance D, Muller W, Villa I (eds) Geochronology: linking the isotopic record with petrology and textures. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Baxter EF, DePaolo DJ (2000) Field measurement of slow metamorphic reaction rates at temperatures of 500° to 600 °C. Science 288:1411–1414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter EF, DePaolo DJ (2002a) Field measurement of high temperature bulk reaction rates. I: Theory and technique. Am J Sci 302:442–464Google Scholar
  4. Baxter EF, DePaolo DJ (2002b) Field measurement of high temperature bulk reaction rates. II: Interpretation of results from a field site near Simplon Pass, Switzerland. Am J Sci 302:465–516Google Scholar
  5. Baxter EF, Ague JJ, DePaolo DJ (2002) Prograde temperature-time evolution in the Barrovian type-locality constrained by Sm/Nd garnet ages from Glen Clova, Scotland. J Geol Soc Lond 159:71–82Google Scholar
  6. Baxter EF (2003) Natural Constraints on Metamorphic Reaction Rates. In Vance D, Muller W, Villa I (eds) Geochronology: Linking the Isotopic Record with Petrology and Textures. Geological Society, London, Special Publication 220:183–220Google Scholar
  7. Brodie KH, Rutter EH (1985) On the relationship between deformation and metamorphism, with special reference to the behavior of basic rocks. In: Thompson AB, Rubie DC (eds) Metamorphic reactions: kinetics, textures, and deformation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 138–179Google Scholar
  8. Carlson WD, Johnson CD (1991) Coronal reaction textures in garnet amphibolites of the Llano Uplift. Am Mineral 76:756–772Google Scholar
  9. Christensen JN, Rosenfeld JL, DePaolo DJ (1989) Rates of tectonometamorphic processes from rubidium and strontium isotopes in garnet. Science 244:1465–1469Google Scholar
  10. Christensen JN, Selverstone J, Rosenfeld JL, DePaolo DJ (1994) Correlation by Rb-Sr geochronology of garnet growth histories from different structural levels within the Tauern Window, eastern Alps. Contrib Mineral Petrol 118:1–12Google Scholar
  11. Cooper RF, Kohlstedt DL (1984) Rheology and structure of olivine basalt partial melts. J Geophys Res 91:9315–9323Google Scholar
  12. DePaolo DJ, Getty SR (1996) Models of isotopic exchange in fluid-rock systems: implications for geochronology in metamorphic rocks. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:3933–3947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans B, Kohlstedt DL (1995) Rheology of rocks. Rock physics and phase relations: a handbook of physical constants. AGU Ref Shelf 3. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Farver JR, Yund RA (2000) Silicon diffusion in a natural quartz aggregate: constraints on solution-transfer diffusion creep. Tectonophysics 325:193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham CM, Skelton ADL, Bickle MJ (1997) Lithological, structural and deformation controls on fluid flow during regional metamorphism. In: Holness MB (ed) Deformation-enhanced melt segregation and metamorphic fluid transport. Mineral Society, Chapman and Hall, London, pp 196–226Google Scholar
  16. Green HW (1984) “Pressure solution” creep: some causes and mechanisms. J Geophys Res 89:4313–4318Google Scholar
  17. Green DH, Burnley PC (1989) A new self-organizing mechanism for deep-focus earthquakes. Nature 341:733–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Handy MR (1989) Deformation regimes and the rheological evolution of fault zones in the lithosphere: the effects of pressure, temperature, grain size and time. Tectonophysics 163:119–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hay RS, Evans B (1987) Chemically induced grain boundary migration in calcite: temperature dependence, phenomenology, and possible applications to geologic systems. Contrib Mineral Petrol 97:127–141Google Scholar
  20. Heinrich W, Metz P, Gottschalk M (1989) Experimental investigation of the kinetics of the reaction 1 tremolite + 11 dolomite = 8 forsterite + 13 calcite + 9 CO2+1 H2O. Contrib Mineral Petrol 102:163–173Google Scholar
  21. Helgeson HC, Murphy WM, Aagaard P (1984) Thermodynamic and kinetic constraints on reaction rates among minerals and aqueous solutions. II. Rate constants, effective surface area, and the hydrolysis of feldspar. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:2405–2432Google Scholar
  22. Hirth G, Tullis J (1992) Dislocation creep regimes in quartz aggregates. J Struct Geol 14:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karato S, Wu P (1993) Rheology of the upper mantle: a synthesis. Science 260:771–778Google Scholar
  24. Kirby SH, Durham WB, Stern LA (1991) Mantle phase-changes and deep-earthquake faulting in subducting lithosphere. Science 252:216–225Google Scholar
  25. Knipe RJ, Wintsch RP (1985) Heterogeneous deformation, foliation development, and metamorphic processes in a polyphase mylonite. In: Thompson AB, Rubie DC (eds) Metamorphic reactions: kinetics textures, and deformation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 180–210Google Scholar
  26. Kohn MJ, Valley JW (1994) Oxygen isotope constraints on metamorphic fluid flow, Townshend Dam, Vermont, USA. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:5551–5566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kruse R, Stunitz H (1999) Deformation mechanisms and phase distribution in mafic high-temperature mylonites from the Jotun Nappe, southern Norway. Tectonophysics 303:223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kruse S, McNutt M, Phipps-Morgan J, Royden L (1991) Lithospheric extension near Mead Lake, Nevada: a model for ductile flow in the lower crust. J Geophys Res 96:4435–4456Google Scholar
  29. Joesten R (1983) Grain growth and grain-boundary diffusion in quartz from the Christmas Mountains (Texas) contact aureole. Am J Sci 283A:233–254Google Scholar
  30. Lasaga AC (1986) Metamorphic reaction rate laws and development of isograds. Mineral Mag 50:359–373Google Scholar
  31. Lasaga AC, Rye DM (1993) Fluid flow and chemical reaction kinetics in metamorphic systems. Am J Sci 293:361–404Google Scholar
  32. Lasaga AC, Luttge A, Rye DM, Bolton EW (2000) Dynamic treatment of invariant and univariant reactions in metamorphic systems. Am J Sci 300:173–221Google Scholar
  33. Lehner FK (1995) A model for intergranular pressure solution in open systems. Tectonophysics 245:153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthews A (1985) Kinetics and mechanisms of the reaction of zoisite to anorthite under hydrothermal conditions: reaction phenomenology away from the equilibrium region. Contrib Mineral Petrol 89:110–121Google Scholar
  35. McKenzie D, Nimmo F, Jackson JA, Gans PB, Miller EL (2000) Characteristics and consequences of flow in the lower crust. J Geophys Res 105:11029–11046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Milke R, Heinrich W (2002) Diffusion-controlled growth of wollastonite rims between quartz and calcite; comparison between nature and experiment. J Met Geol 20:467–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muller W, Aerden D, Halliday AN (2000) Isotopic dating of strain fringe increments: duration and rates of deformation in shear zones. Science 288:2195–2198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman J, Lamb WM, Drury MR, Vissers RLM (1999) Deformation processes in a peridotite shear zone: reaction-softening by an H2O deficient, continuous net transfer reaction. Tectonophysics 303:193–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paterson MS (1995) A theory for granular flow accommodated by material transfer via an intergranular fluid. Tectonophysics 245:135–152Google Scholar
  40. Pfiffner OA, Ramsey JG (1982) Constraints on geological strain rates: arguments from finite strain rates of naturally deformed rocks. J Geophys Res 87:311–321Google Scholar
  41. Poirier JP (1985) Creep of crystals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 260 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Poirier JP, Guillope M (1979) Deformation induced recrystallization of minerals. Bull Mineral 102:67–74Google Scholar
  43. Rosenfeld JL (1970) Rotated garnets in metamorphic rocks. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 129Google Scholar
  44. Rubie DC (1983) Reaction enhanced ductility; the role of solid–solid univariant reactions in the deformation of the crust and mantle. Tectonophysics 96:233–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubie DC, Thompson AB (1985) Kinetics of metamorphic reactions at elevated temperatures and pressures: an appraisal of available experimental data. In: Thompson AB, Rubie DC (eds) Metamorphic reactions: kinetics, textures, and deformation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 138–179Google Scholar
  46. Rutter EH (1983) Pressure solution in nature, theory and experiment. J Geol Soc Lond 140:725–740Google Scholar
  47. Rutter EH (1999) On the relationship between the formation of shear zones and the form of the flow law for rocks undergoing dynamic recrystallization. Tectonophysics 303:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rutter EH, Brodie KH (1988) Experimental approaches to the study of deformation/metamorphism relationships. Mineral Mag 52:35–42Google Scholar
  49. Rutter EH, Brodie KH (1995) Mechanistic interactions between deformation and metamorphism. Geol J 30:227–240Google Scholar
  50. Schramke JA, Kerrick DM, Lasaga AC (1987) The reaction muscovite+quartz=andalusite+k-feldspar+water. Part 1. Growth kinetics and mechanism. Am J Sci 287:517–559Google Scholar
  51. Shimizu I (1995) Kinetics of pressure solution creep in quartz: theoretical considerations. Tectonophysics 245:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simpson C (1985) Deformation of granitic-rocks across the brittle ductile transition. J Struct Geol 7:503–511Google Scholar
  53. Skelton ADL, Bickle MJ, Graham CM (1997) Fluid flux and reaction rate from advective-diffusive carbonation of mafic sill margins in the Dalradian, southwest Scottish Highlands. Earth Planet Sci Lett 146:527–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snow E, Yund RA (1987) The effect of ductile deformation on the kinetics and mechanisms of the aragonite-calcite transformation. J Metamorphic Geol 5:141–153Google Scholar
  55. Steffen K, Selverstone J, Brearley A (2001) Episodic weakening and strengthening during synmetamorphic deformation in a deep-crustal shear zone in the Alps. In: Holdsworth RE, Strachan RA, Magloughlin JF, Knipe RJ (eds) The nature and tectonic significance of fault zone weakening. Geological Society, London, pp 141–156Google Scholar
  56. Stockhert B, Wachmann M, Kuster M, Bimmerman S (1999) Low effective viscosity during high-pressure metamorphism due to dissolution precipitation creep: the record of HP-LT metamorphic carbonates and siliciclastic rocks from Crete. Tectonophysics 303:299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stowell HH, Taylor DL, Tinkham DL, Goldberg SA, Ouderkirk KA (2001) Contact metamorphic P-T-t paths from Sm-Nd garnet ages, phase equilibria modeling and thermobarometry: Garnet Ledge, south-eastern Alaska, USA. J Metamorphic Geol 19:645–660Google Scholar
  58. Stunitz H (1998) Syndeformational recrystallization—dynamic or compositionally induced? Contrib Mineral Petrol 131:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stunitz H, Tullis J (2001) Weakening and strain localization produced by syn-deformational reaction of plagioclase. Int J Earth Sci 90:136–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thompson AB (1983) Fluid-absent metamorphism. J Geol Soc Lond 140:533–547Google Scholar
  61. Tullis J, Yund RA (1991) Diffusion creep in feldspar aggregates: experimental evidence. J Struct Geol 13:987–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turcotte DL, Schubert G (1982) Geodynamics: applications of continuum physics to geological problems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Urai JL, Means WD, Lister GS (1986) Dynamic recrystallization of minerals. AGU Geophys Monogr 36:161–199Google Scholar
  64. Vance D, Harris N (1999) Timing of prograde metamorphism in the Zanskar Himalaya. Geology 27:395–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vance D, O’Nions RK (1992) Prograde and retrograde thermal histories from the central Swiss Alps. Earth Planet Sci Lett 114:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wibberly C (1999) Are feldspar-to-mica reactions necessarily reaction-softening processes in fault zones? J Struct Geol 21:1219–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wintsch RP, Yi K (2002) Dissolution and replacement creep: a significant deformation mechanism in mid-crustal rocks. J Struct Geol 24:1179–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wood BJ, Walther JV (1983) Rates of hydrothermal reactions. Science 222:413–415Google Scholar
  69. Yund RA, Tullis J (1991) Compositional changes of minerals associated with dynamic recrystallization. Contrib Mineral Petrol 108:346–355Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Geological and Planetary SciencesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Planetary ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Department of Earth SciencesBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations