Skip to main content
Log in

Can an Emergency Department Observation Unit Reduce Hospital Admissions for COPD Exacerbation?

  • COPD
  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies on observation unit (OU) use to avoid a hospital admission from the emergency department (ED) have found variable effects on health care resource utilization, and these effects have not been studied in acute exacerbation of chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (AECOPD). We retrospectively collected data for all AECOPD-related ED visits (age > 40) to an urban, academic medical center between February 2013 and April 2017. We examined the total proportion of visits admitted to the hospital before and after availability of an OU and the proportion of visits discharged directly from the ED using segmented regression analysis. There was a 12.8% reduction in hospital admissions after OU availability (79.6 vs. 66.8%, p = 0.0049) without a change in the proportion discharged directly from the ED (p = 0.65). The availability of an OU can decrease hospital AECOPD admissions without affecting the number of patients discharged directly from the ED.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baugh CW, Bohan JS (2014) Emergency department observation units. In: Emergency department leadership and management: best principles and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 234–246

  2. Mace SE et al (2003) A national survey of observation units in the United States. Am J Emerg Med 21(7):529–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Graff L (2009) Observation medicine: the healthcare system’s tincture of time. American College of Emergency Physicians, p 176

  4. Abbass IM et al (2015) Revisiting the economic efficiencies of observation units. Manag Care 24(3):46–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farkouh ME et al (1998) A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. N Engl J Med 339(26):1882–1888

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blecker S et al (2016) Observation units as substitutes for hospitalization or home discharge. Ann Emerg Med 67(6):706–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brillman JC, Tandberg D (1994) Observation unit impact on ED admission for asthma. Am J Emerg Med 12(1):11–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosychuk RJ, Youngson E, Rowe BH (2016) Presentations to emergency departments for COPD: a time series analysis. Can Respir J 2016:1382434

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. 2016. http://www.goldcopd.org

  10. Dickey DA (2015) Stationarity issues in time series models. North Carolina State University, paper, p 192-30

  11. Wagner AK et al (2002) Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther 27(4):299–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zun L (1990) Observation units: boom or bust for emergency medicine. J Emerg Med 8(4):485–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall JR et al (2017) Use of physician-in-triage model in the management of abdominal pain in an emergency department observation unit. West J Emerg Med 18(2):181–188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sidney S. Braman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Budde, J., Agarwal, P., Mazumdar, M. et al. Can an Emergency Department Observation Unit Reduce Hospital Admissions for COPD Exacerbation?. Lung 196, 267–270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-018-0102-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-018-0102-1

Keywords

Navigation