, Volume 193, Issue 6, pp 1023–1027 | Cite as

Clinical Utility of a Plasma Protein Classifier for Indeterminate Lung Nodules

  • Anil Vachani
  • Zane Hammoud
  • Steven Springmeyer
  • Neri Cohen
  • Dao Nguyen
  • Christina Williamson
  • Sandra Starnes
  • Stephen Hunsucker
  • Scott Law
  • Xiao-Jun Li
  • Alexander Porter
  • Paul Kearney
Open Access


Evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules is a complex challenge. Most are benign but frequently undergo invasive and costly procedures to rule out malignancy. A plasma protein classifier was developed that identifies likely benign nodules that can be triaged to CT surveillance to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. The clinical utility of this classifier was assessed in a prospective–retrospective analysis of a study enrolling 475 patients with nodules 8–30 mm in diameter who had an invasive procedure to confirm diagnosis at 12 sites. Using this classifier, 32.0 % (CI 19.5–46.7) of surgeries and 31.8 % (CI 20.9–44.4) of invasive procedures (biopsy and/or surgery) on benign nodules could have been avoided. Patients with malignancy triaged to CT surveillance by the classifier would have been 24.0 % (CI 19.2–29.4). This rate is similar to that described in clinical practices (24.5 % CI 16.2–34.4). This study demonstrates the clinical utility of a non-invasive blood test for pulmonary nodules.


Xpresys lung Lung nodule Clinical utility Prospective Biomarker Lung cancer 


A large number of pulmonary nodules are identified annually in the U.S. presenting a difficult clinical challenge, as the majority ultimately prove to be of benign origin [1]. Physicians are faced with developing a diagnostic strategy that identifies nodules that are malignant and yet minimizes the risks of invasive procedures on benign nodules. Currently available tools to assist physicians include risk prediction models [2] and imaging, such as PET/CT. However, evidence suggests that these tools have limitations in practice [3, 4].

With the adoption of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer [5] and the anticipated increase in pulmonary nodules, there is a growing interest in biomarkers as diagnostic adjuncts [6, 7]. Advances in proteomic technologies permitted the development of a 371 protein classifier composed of lung cancer-associated proteins [6]. The discovery phase identified a subset of five diagnostic proteins that participate in several lung cancer-associated pathways (pathogenesis, chronic lung inflammation, oxidative stress response) [6]. The classifier was further validated in patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules to identify likely benign nodules with high accuracy (negative predictive value 90 %, sensitivity 92 % and specificity 20 %). The classifier is additive to currently used clinical risk factors, and has high analytic performance [8, 9]. The intent of the present study is to evaluate the clinical utility of this classifier in a multicenter study of patients with indeterminate nodules undergoing invasive diagnostic procedures.


Study Design and Population

The study used a prospective-specimen-collection and retrospective-blinded-evaluation (prospective–retrospective) design. Patients with an indeterminate pulmonary nodule were enrolled at 12 geographically diverse sites in the U.S. Eligible patients were those with a lung nodule between 8 and 30 mm in diameter, minimum 40 years of age, and had recently completed a CT-guided needle aspiration (TTNA) or bronchoscopic biopsy with an established diagnosis or scheduled for a surgical lung biopsy. Exclusion criteria included a prior malignancy within 5 years of lung nodule identification or a clinical tumor stage ≥T2, nodal stage ≥N2, or evidence of metastatic disease.

All TTNA and bronchoscopy procedures were categorized as either diagnostic (provided a specific malignant or benign pathological diagnosis), or non-diagnostic (the specific etiology of the lung nodule remained unknown). All surgical procedures were categorized into either diagnostic (i.e., no specific prior diagnosis) or therapeutic (i.e., surgery preceded by a TTNA or bronchoscopy that yielded a malignant diagnosis).

For comparison to practice patterns, we utilized a retrospective-observational study of 377 patients with pulmonary nodules between 8 and 20 mm, presenting to 18 geographically representative outpatient pulmonary clinics [3, 4]. In addition to the published data for the study, an additional analysis was performed to determine the number of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients triaged to CT surveillance during management, specifically, those having a second CT scan at least 3 months after the initial CT scan and no sooner than 3 days before surgery.

Protein Expression Classifier Analysis

Samples collected from subjects prior to definitive excision or treatment of the nodule were analyzed using multiple reaction monitoring as previously described [6, 8]. The protein classifier, Xpresys® Lung, consists of 5 diagnostic and 6 normalization proteins and has been analytically and clinically validated [6, 8, 9]. The classifier reports “likely benign” when the probability of the lung nodule having benign etiology is high (NPV at least 84 %) and the remainder are reported as “indeterminate.” In accordance with best practices, the classifier was adjusted for evaluation of archival specimens included in this study (see Supplementary). Physicians and patients were blinded to the protein classifier results and laboratory personnel blinded to clinical outcomes.

Statistical Analysis

To assess the ability of the classifier to improve the diagnostic evaluation of indeterminate lung nodules and its clinical utility, we assessed all procedures and outcomes and modeled the change in invasive procedures that would occur if the classifier results were used prospectively for decision making. The primary outcomes for this analysis were the potential benefits, i.e., reduction in invasive procedures (TTNA, bronchoscopy, and surgery), and the potential harms, i.e., rate of patients with malignant nodules routed to CT surveillance. This analysis assumes that all patients with a likely benign result would not undergo surgery or other invasive testing, but instead would be evaluated by CT surveillance.

Continuous and categorical variables were assessed using Mann–Whitney and Fisher’s exact tests. Confidence intervals (CIs) are reported as two-sided binomial 95 % CIs. Statistical analysis was performed using the R statistical package [10].


A total of 475 subjects were enrolled prospectively from April 2012 to December 2014 in the registered study, NCT01752101. Of these, 353 patients were eligible for the clinical utility analysis; 287 (81.3 %, CI 76.8–85.2 %) were diagnosed with NSCLC, and 66 (18.7 %, CI 14.8–23.2 %) diagnosed with a benign lung nodule (Fig. 1). Reasons for subject ineligibility included violating the inclusion/exclusion requirements of the registered study (50 subjects), diagnosed with a cancer other than NSCLC (43 subjects), unable to obtain a definitive diagnosis due to missing data (26 subjects) and improper sample handling resulting in unanalyzable sample (3 subjects). Baseline demographics are shown in Table 1. Lung cancer patients were older (p value 0.03), and had greater cumulative tobacco pack-years (p value 0.04). No difference in nodule size between groups was observed (p value 0.45).
Fig. 1

Flowchart of subjects included in clinical utility analyses along with categorization of subjects by procedure, outcome and classifier report. ‘LB’ and ‘IND’ represent a classifier ‘Likely Benign’ and ‘Indeterminate’ report, respectively. Dx indicates diagnostic, Non-Dx is a non-diagnostic procedure, and Dx Biopsy includes patients with a biopsy only and those that had a diagnostic biopsy followed by surgery

Table 1

Patient demographics stratified by diagnosis


All patients



p value






Age (years) [mean (range)]

68 (44.7–95.5)

68.6 (45.3–95.5)

65.4 (44.7–87.5)


Gender (n, %)




154 (43.6)

121 (42.2)

33 (50.0)



199 (56.4)

166 (57.8)

33 (50.0)


Smoking history

 Status (n, %)




60 (17.0)

46 (16.0)

14 (21.2)



210 (59.5)

173 (60.2)

37 (56.1)



76 (21.5)

64 (22.3)

12 (18.2)


  Passive exposure

7 (2.0)

4 (1.3)

3 (4.5)


 Pack-year mean (range)c

41.5 (0.5–150)

42.8 (0.8–150)

35.1 (0.5–120)


Lung nodules

 Size (mm) [mean (range)]

18.5 (8.0–30)

18.6 (8.0–30)

18.0 (8.0–30)


aBased on Mann–Whitney test (cancer versus benign)

bBased on Fisher’s exact test (cancer versus benign)

cBased on n = 285 (benign = 48 and cancer = 237)

The 353 patients were evaluated by procedure type (Fig. 1). A total of 101 patients were enrolled following a diagnostic TTNA or bronchoscopy biopsy, yielding 16 (15.8 %, CI 9.3–24.4 %) benign lesions and 85 (84.2 %, 75.6–90.7 %) patients with NSCLC. A total of 252 patients underwent a surgical lung biopsy; 224 (88.9 %, CI 84.3–92.5 %) did not have a preceding biopsy and 28 (11.1 %, CI 7.5–15.7 %) were performed following a biopsy that was non-diagnostic. Among the 224 patients proceeding directly to surgical lung biopsy, 44 had a benign diagnosis (19.6 %, CI 14.7-25.5 %) and 180 had NSCLC (80.4 %, CI 74.5–85.3 %). Among the 28 patients undergoing surgical lung biopsy following a non-diagnostic biopsy, 6 had a benign diagnosis (21.4 %, CI 8.3–41 %) and 22 had NSCLC (78.6 %, CI 59–91.7 %).

In total, 66 of 353 (18.7 %, CI 14.8–23.2 %) patients that underwent an invasive procedure (TTNA, bronchoscopy, surgical lung biopsy) were ultimately diagnosed with a benign nodule. This included 50 of 252 (19.8 %, CI 15.1–25.3 %) patients that underwent a surgical lung biopsy and 22 of 129 (17.1 %, CI 11.0–24.7 %) patients that had a bronchoscopy or TTNA. Six (9.1 %, CI 3.4–18.7 %) patients with benign lesions underwent multiple invasive procedures.

To estimate the effect of the classifier on the number of invasive procedures in patients with benign nodules, we determined the “likely benign” classifier result among patients. The classifier predicted the nodule to be likely benign in 16 of 50 patients (32.0 %. CI 19.5–46.7 %) determined to have a benign lesion by surgical lung biopsy. When considering all invasive procedures, the classifier predicted the nodule to be likely benign in 21 of 66 patients (31.8 %, CI 20.9–44.4 %) with benign nodules diagnosed by either TTNA, bronchoscopy biopsy, or surgical lung biopsy.

Of the 287 cancers identified in the study, the classifier predicted “likely benign” in 49 patients (17.1 %, CI 12.9–21.9 %) that were diagnosed by surgical biopsy and in 69 patients (24.0 %, CI 19.2–29.4 %) diagnosed by any invasive procedure. Consequently, 17–24 % of patients with a lung cancer nodule would be triaged to CT surveillance. This was similar to the rate observed in the retrospective-observational cohort where 23 of 94 patients (24.5 %, CI 16.2–34.4 %) with nodules ultimately diagnosed as NSCLC underwent CT surveillance during nodule management.


This study presents the clinical utility of a protein classifier for the management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Clinical utility is “the balance of benefits and harms associated with the use of the test in practice, including improvement in measureable clinical outcomes and the usefulness or added value in decision-making compared with not using the test” [11]. This prospective–retrospective study demonstrates that use of the classifier produces the potential benefit of reducing unnecessary surgeries (32.0 %) and invasive procedures (31.8 %). The potential harm (malignant lung nodules routed to CT surveillance) is 17.1 % if the classifier is used prior to surgery and 24.0 % if used prior to any invasive procedure. This compares favorably to 24.5 % as observed in 18 pulmonary clinic practices [3, 4]. This indicates that this classifier can provide incremental clinical utility over usual care. Importantly, the level of evidence is high at level 1B [12] which compares favorably to the GRADE 1C and 2C recommendations within the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines on pulmonary nodule management [13, 14, 15].

The risks and expense of biopsies and surgery are considerable with TTNA having pneumothorax rates of 15 % and surgery mortality rates of 1–5 % [13]. Notably, nearly 10 % of patients in this study had multiple procedures. These rates of complications are of increasing concern as screening LDCT is now recommended for those at high risk of lung cancer. Thirty-nine percent of patients undergoing LDCT had a least one positive screen, with the majority (96 %) being false positives [16].

The strengths of this study include its magnitude, geographic diversity, high level of evidence, and generalizability. A limitation is the comparison of rates of malignant nodules routed to CT surveillance by usual care (24.5 %) to the classifier (17.1 %; 24.0 %). Although both estimates are taken over all malignant nodules, the former includes nodules between 8 and 20 mm and the present analysis includes nodules between 8 and 30 mm in diameter.

In summary, this classifier can assist physicians with the challenging task of differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules for the purpose of reducing unnecessary invasive procedures on benign nodules. This classifier can be used early in the evaluation process, in combination with physician assessment, and before choosing an invasive procedure in the evaluation of newly discovered 8–30 mm pulmonary nodules (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

The incorporation of the classifier into the ACCP guidelines for lung nodule management. Newly identified lung nodules between 8 and 30 mm in diameter are assessed using the plasma protein classifier. The classifier results are integrated into the physician’s assessment of cancer risk



Authors wish to acknowledge the efforts of participating sites, analysts at Integrated Diagnostics and Ken Fang for insightful comments on the manuscript. Supported by Integrated Diagnostics

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the concept and design of the study; the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of the data; participated in the drafting and revision of the article critically for important intellectual content; and gave their final approval of the version to be published.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Vachani has received consulting fees from Integrated Diagnostics. Dr. Springmeyer is employed by Integrated Diagnostics. Dr. Hunsucker is employed by Integrated Diagnostics. Dr. Law is employed by Integrated Diagnostics. Dr. Li is employed by Integrated Diagnostics. Dr. Porter is employed by Integrated Diagnostics. Dr. Kearney is employed by Integrated Diagnostics.

Ethical approval and Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

408_2015_9800_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (42 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 43 kb)
408_2015_9800_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (65 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 65 kb)


  1. 1.
    Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH (2003) The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 348(25):2535–2542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG (2007) A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 131:383–388PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanner NT, Aggarwal J, Gould MK, Kearney P, Diette G, Vachani A, Fang KC, Silvestri GA (2015) Management of pulmonary nodules by community pulmonologists: a multicenter observational study. Chest. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0630 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vachani A, Tanner NT, Diette GB, Aggarwal J, Mathews C, Goss T, Kearney P, Fang K, Silvestri G (2014) A Markov model derived to quantify drivers of decision making in the evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules. Am J Repir Crit Care Med 189:A2259Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jensen T, Chin J, Ashby L. Hermansen J, Hutter JD (2015) Decision memo for screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT). Accessed 8 June 2015
  6. 6.
    Li XJ, Hayward C, Fong PY et al (2015) A blood-based proteomic classifier for the molecular characterization of pulmonary nodules. Sci Transl Med 5(207):207ra142Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spira A for the AEGIS Study Team, Silvestri GA, Vachani A, Whitney D, Elashoff M, Smith PK, Ferguson JS, Parsons E, Mitra N, Brody J, Lenburg ME (2015) A bronchial genomic classifier for the diagnostic evaluation of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 365:395–409Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vachani A, Pass H, Rom WN et al (2015) Validation of a multiprotein plasma classifier to identify benign lung nodules. J Thorac Oncol 10:629–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li XJ, Lee LW, Hayward C et al (2015) An integrated quantification method to increase the precision, robustness, and resolution of protein measurement in human plasma samples. Clin Proteomics 12:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  11. 11.
    Haddow J, Palomaki G (2003) ACCE: a model process for evaluating data on emerging genetic tests. In: Khoury M, Little J, Burke W (eds) Human genome epidemiology: a scientific foundation for using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 217–233Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S et al (2004) Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 4(38):1–7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR et al (2013) Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143:e93S–e120SPubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simon R, Paik S, Hayes DF (2009) Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1446–1452PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayes DF, Bast RC, Desch CE et al (1996) Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(20):1456–1466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD et al (2011) Reduced lung cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anil Vachani
    • 1
  • Zane Hammoud
    • 2
  • Steven Springmeyer
    • 7
  • Neri Cohen
    • 3
  • Dao Nguyen
    • 4
  • Christina Williamson
    • 5
  • Sandra Starnes
    • 6
  • Stephen Hunsucker
    • 7
  • Scott Law
    • 7
  • Xiao-Jun Li
    • 7
  • Alexander Porter
    • 7
  • Paul Kearney
    • 7
  1. 1.Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania/Abramson Research CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Henry Ford HospitalDetroitUSA
  3. 3.Greater Baltimore Medical CenterBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Miami Hospital & ClinicsMiamiUSA
  5. 5.Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryLahey Hospital & Medical CenterBurlingtonUSA
  6. 6.University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  7. 7.Integrated DiagnosticsSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations