Latent tuberculosis infection is assumed to be a probable M. tuberculosis complex infection based on a positive TST and/or a positive QFT result with no clinical, bacteriological, or radiological symptoms of disease [1, 9]. However, it is believed that in patients with latent TB infection, “clinically silent” calcified, fibrotic, and fibro-nodular pulmonary lesions suggestive of previous pulmonary tuberculosis may be present [1]. In clinical practice, available tests that assess latent M. tuberculosis infection actually evaluate an adaptive immune response against mycobacterial antigens, and they are not able to distinguish between immunological memory and an ongoing effector T-cell response. Currently, there are no diagnostic tools that ensure direct infection identification, i.e., confirmation of TB bacteria presence in the body. The highest risk of tuberculosis occurs immediately after the contact with an infected person and it decreases gradually over 2 years. After this period, the risk maintains at a stable, low level; it is approximately one case per 1,000 person-years [10, 11]. According to the currently applicable strategy of management of individuals who have had a close contact with a TB patient, a TST and/or IGRA as well as a chest X-ray must be performed as soon as possible after the exposure and then after a window period, i.e., 8 weeks following the last contact with the index case during the period of infectiousness [1]. Nosocomial transmission of M. tuberculosis is well known, and the healthcare staff is considered a group at a higher risk of close contact with TB patients [3–7]. In our previous study, we found positive TSTs in 63.6 % and positive QFTs in 20.5 % of the health care professionals who declared any (even accidental) contact with tuberculosis in the past [7]. We also revealed that in the Polish society, a high probability of false-positive TSTs due to post-vaccination reactions made the tuberculin skin test a less useful diagnostic method than IGRAs for the evaluation of LTBI [7]. As opposed to the TST, positive QFT results were significantly related to some independent occupational and non-occupational risk factors, such as an older age, a lower education level, or a period of employment in the health care field of Polish HCWs [7]. In the present study, due to a restrictive classification of contacts around the index case according to the degree of exposure consistent with the European recommendations and inclusion of participants subjected to screening tests after a TB contact in the past into the analysis, proportions of positive TST and QFT results in the study group were higher: 86.8 and 32.5 %, respectively. In our study, late radiological pulmonary findings suggestive of previous tuberculosis were reported in 18 (21.7 %) out of 83 HCWs who declared a contact with tuberculosis in the past. The changes were not found during radiological examinations performed within 2 months to 2 years following the contact. In the literature, a poor usefulness of screening chest radiological examinations for tuberculosis detection in countries with a low TB prevalence among asymptomatic individuals is emphasized [12, 13]. Eisenberg [12], while studying asymptomatic HCWs with positive TSTs in the pre-employment setting, found radiological changes suggestive of previous tuberculosis in only 6.1 % of the subjects. In countries with a high TB prevalence, radiological findings suggestive of previous, non-active tuberculosis are reported in more than 60 % of HCWs with a positive TST or QFT result [14]. Moreover, in some studies conducted in high TB incidence settings, no difference in positive rates of TST as well as QFT was revealed between people with and without X-ray chest lesions suggestive of old-healed TB [14]. On the other hand, the results of another study denote higher positive rates of TST and QFT among participants with silent post-tuberculosis pulmonary lesions than among people without old-healed opacities [15]. In our study, we found lesions specific for previous tuberculosis in 21.7 % of clinically asymptomatic HCWs who had been exposed to TB more than 10 years before. All participants with radiological changes had standard screening tuberculosis tests in the past soon after a contact with the disease, and none of them suffered from TB from the contact date until inclusion into the study. As in the case of positive QFT results, radiological changes were significantly more frequent in the participants who declared close and intense contact with tuberculosis patients (circle 1) compared to the participants in the middle and outer circles (Table 3). The degree of intensity of contact with the index case did not significantly affect proportions of positive TST results in the inner, middle, and outer circles: 95.2, 87.9, and 79.3 %, respectively. The results of the TSTs showed a markedly lower positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio compared to the positive results of the QFTs with respect to a prognosis of post-tuberculosis lesions in the asymptomatic patients (Table 2). A lower diagnostic value of the TST clearly results from a great number of false-positive post-vaccination tuberculin test as in Poland, for many years until 2006, an obligatory schedule of vaccination against tuberculosis existed, involving even five BCG injections in the period from the birth to 18 years of age depending on the size of post-vaccination scar after the 1st year of life and diameters of post-tuberculin infiltrations at the age of 7, 12, and 18.
The positive QFT result in the log-linear analysis was the only relevant predictive factor of the risk of radiological findings specific for previous tuberculosis many years after the exposure (OR = 8.3; p = 0.005). In the log-linear analysis, closeness and intensity of the contact with a tuberculosis patient did not increase the risk of presence of lesions suggestive of previous tuberculosis following the period of standard screening tests related to TB exposure. In view of no effects of TB exposure intensity on the presence of radiological changes, a prognostic value of the positive QFTs can be a manifestation of phenotypic predisposition of certain individuals to morphological and immunological responses that lead to the initial immune priming and development of clinically silent radiological findings suggestive of previous tuberculosis many years following the exposure and normal screening results. A certain disadvantage of the study is the fact that we cannot definitely exclude the possibility that the participants had more unaware and not reported contacts with tuberculosis following the first exposure and that they had self-healed TB. However, none of the participants reported any typical TB symptoms to occur since the date of first contact, such as chronic cough, long-term subfebrile temperature, weight loss, or haemoptysis. Other disadvantages of the study are exclusion of people with immunosuppressive diseases and indeterminate result of QFT. Summing up, a positive QFT result is associated with an 8.3 odds ratio of clinically silent lesions in the lung parenchyma suggestive of previous pulmonary tuberculosis in asymptomatic individuals who have never had active TB, and the results of their radiographic tests performed within the recommended post-exposure period have been normal. Our findings suggest that in some people, there could exist a phenotypic immune predisposition for development of radiological opacities after exposure to tuberculosis, and about one-half of the patients with a positive result on their QFT, who have the correct result from the chest X-ray exam during the primary period after contact with tuberculosis could develop silent radiological symptoms of tuberculosis many years after the date of exposure (positive predictive value–48.2 %). Moreover, negative results from the QFT performed many years after contact with tuberculosis seem to be strong evidence that there are no old-healed post-tuberculosis lesions in the lung parenchyma (negative predictive value–91.1 %). These results compel to afterthought whether people with positive QFT, particularly if they had close contact with tuberculosis, should cover more careful and extended medical care after contact with tuberculosis, and whether such patients could have X-ray follow-up exams done many years after contact with tuberculosis. However, further studies are needed for confirmation of these guesses.