Abstract
E-mental health applications (apps) are an increasingly important factor for the treatment of depression. To assess the risks and benefits for patients, an in-depth ethical analysis is necessary. The objective of this paper is to determine the ethical implications of app-based treatment for depression. An evidence-based ethical analysis was conducted. The material was meta-reviews and randomized control studies (RCTs) on app-based treatment. Based on the empirical data, an ethical analysis was conducted using the 3-ACES-approach by Thornicroft and Tansella. Apps may empower autonomy, offer an uninterrupted series of contacts over a period of time, show evidence-based benefits for patients with subclinical and mild-to-moderate-symptoms, are easily accessible, may be used for coordinating information and services within an episode of care, and are on the whole cost-effective. Their risks are that they are not suitable for the whole range of severity of mental illnesses and patient characteristics, show severe deficits in the data privacy policy, and a big variability in quality standards. The use of apps in depression treatment can be beneficial for patients as long as (1) the usefulness of an app-based treatment is assessed for each individual patient, (2) apps are chosen according to symptom severity as well as characteristics like the patient’s level of self-reliance, their e-literacy, and their openness vis-à-vis apps, (3) manufacturers improve their privacy policies and the quality of apps.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization (2017) Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. World Health Organization, Geneva
Pihlaja S, Stenberg JH, Joutsenniemi K et al (2017) Therapeutic alliance in guided internet therapy programs for depression and anxiety disorders—a systematic review. Internet Interv 11:1–10
Callan JA, Wright J, Siegle GJ et al (2017) Use of computer and mobile technologies in the treatment of depression. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 31(3):311–318
Königbauer J, Letsch J, Doebler P et al (2017) Internet- and mobile-based depression interventions for people with diagnosed depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 223:28–40
Araya R, Zitko P, Markkula N et al (2018) Determinants of access to health care for depression in 49 countries: a multilevel analysis. J Affect Disord 234:80–88
Kerst A, Zielasek J, Gaebel W (2019) Smartphone applications for depression: a systematic literature review and a survey of health care professionals’ attitudes towards their use in clinical practice. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0974-3
Lipschitz J, Miller CJ, Hogan TP et al (2019) Adoption of mobile apps for depression and anxiety: cross-sectional survey study on patient interest and barriers to engagement. JMIR Ment Health 6(1):e11334. https://doi.org/10.2196/11334
Andrews G, Basu A, Cuijpers P et al (2018) Computer therapy for the anxiety and depression disorders is effective, acceptable and practical health care: an updated meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord 55:70–78
Stawarz K, Preist C, Tallon D et al (2018) User experience of cognitive behavioral therapy apps for depression: an analysis of app functionality and user reviews. J Med Internet Res 20(6):e10120. https://doi.org/10.2196/10120
Martínez P, Rojas G, Martínezc V et al (2018) Internet-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of depression in people living in developing countries: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 234:193–200
Webb CA, Rosso IM, Rauch SL (2017) Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: current progress and future directions. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 25(3):114–122
Renn BR, Hoeft TJ, Lee HS et al (2019) Preference for in-person psychotherapy versus digital psychotherapy options for depression: survey of adults in the US. NPJ Digit Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0077-1
Stiles-Shields C, Montague E, Lattie EG et al (2017) What might get in the way: barriers to the use of apps for depression. Digit Health 3:1–11
Massoudi B, Holvast F, Bockting CLH et al (2019) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of e-health interventions for depression and anxiety in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 245:728–743
Paganini S, Teigelkötter W, Buntrock C et al (2018) Economic evaluations of internet- and mobile-based interventions for the treatment and prevention of depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 225:733–755
Thornicroft G, Tansella M (1999) Translating ethical principles into outcome measures for mental health service research. Psychol Med 29:761–767
Erbe D, Eichert HC, Riper H et al (2017) Blending face-to-face and internet-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders in adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 19(9):e306
Ebert DD, Cuijpers P, Muñoz RF et al (2017) Prevention of mental health disorders using internet- and mobile-based interventions: a narrative review and recommendations for future research. Front Psychiatry. 8:116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00116
Ebert DD, Donkin L, Andersson G et al (2016) Does internet-based guided-self-help for depression cause harm? An individual participant data meta-analysis on deterioration rates and its moderators in randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med. 46:2679–2693
Buntrock C, Ebert DD, Lehr D et al (2016) Effect of a web-based guided self-help intervention for prevention of major depression in adults with subthreshold depression. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 315(17):1854–1863
Firth J, Torous J, Nicholas J et al (2017) The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry 16:287–298
Versluis A, Verkuil B, Spinhoven P et al (2016) Changing mental health and positive psychological well-being using ecological momentary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 18:e152
Whittaker R, Stasiak K, McDowell H et al (2017) MEMO: an mHealth intervention to prevent the onset of depression in adolescents: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 58(9):1014–1022
Zhang A, Franklin C, Jing S et al (2019) The effectiveness of four empirically supported psychotherapies for primary care depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 245:1168–1186
Simblett S, Matcham F, Siddi S et al (2019) Barriers to and facilitators of engagement with mhealth technology for remote measurement and management of depression: qualitative analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7(1):e11325
Wozney L, McGrath PJ, Gehring ND et al (2018) eMental healthcare technologies for anxiety and depression in childhood and adolescence: systematic review of studies reporting implementation outcomes. JMIR Ment Health 5(2):e48
O'Loughlin K, Neary M, Adkins EC (2019) Reviewing the data security and privacy policies of mobile apps for depression. Internet Interv 15:110–115
Huckvale K, Torous J, Larsen ME (2019) Assessment of the data sharing and privacy practices of smartphone apps for depression and smoking cessation. JAMA Netw Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen
Ng MM, Firth J, Minen M et al (2019) User engagement in mental health apps: a review of measurement, reporting, and validity. Psyciatr Serv. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800519
Seppälä J, De Vita I, Jämsä T et al (2019) Mobile phone and wearable sensor-based mhealth approaches for psychiatric disorders and symptoms: systematic review. JMIR Ment Health 6(2):e9819
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no conflict of interest to report.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rubeis, G. E-mental health applications for depression: an evidence-based ethical analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 271, 549–555 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-019-01093-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-019-01093-y