Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The association of psychopathology with concurrent level of functioning and subjective well-being in persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective is to investigate the relationship between psychopathology measured by the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and concurrent global assessment of functioning (GAF) and subjective well-being under neuroleptics (SWN) in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) regarding severity of illness and disease phase. We analyzed a sample of 202 SSD patients consisting of first episode psychosis (FEP) and multiple episode psychosis (MEP) patients followed up to 12 months using linear mixed models. All PANSS syndromes except excitement were associated with GAF scores (positive syndrome: p < 0.001, d = 1.21; negative syndrome: p = 0.029, d = 0.015; disorganized syndrome: p < 0.001, d = 0.37; anxiety/depression syndrome: p < 0.001, d = 0.49), and positive symptoms had an increasing impact on global functioning with higher severity of illness (mildly ill: p = 0.039, d = 0.22; moderately ill: p < 0.001, d = 0.28; severely ill: p < 0.001, d = 0.69). SWN was associated with positive (p = 0.002, d = 0.22) and anxiety/depression (p < 0.001, d = 0.38) syndromes. Subgroup analyses showed differing patterns depending on illness severity and phase. Over all our results show different patterns of associations of psychopathology and concurrent functioning and subjective well-being. These findings contribute knowledge on the possible role of specific psychopathological syndromes for the functioning and well-being of our patients and may enable tailored treatments depending on severity and phase of illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreasen NC, Carpenter WT Jr, Kane JM, Lasser RA, Marder SR, Weinberger DR (2005) Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry 162(3):441–449. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karow A, Moritz S, Lambert M, Schottle D, Naber D (2012) Remitted but still impaired? Symptomatic versus functional remission in patients with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 27(6):401–405. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.01.012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Best MW, Grossman M, Oyewumi LK, Bowie CR (2016) Examination of the positive and negative syndrome scale factor structure and longitudinal relationships with functioning in early psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 10(2):165–170. doi:10.1111/eip.12190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ritsner MS, Lisker A, Arbitman M (2012) Ten-year quality of life outcomes among patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders: I. Predictive value of disorder-related factors. Qual Life Res 21(5):837–847. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9988-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ortiz BB, Gadelha A, Higuchi CH, Pitta JC, Kagan S, Vong MR, Noto C, Hallak JE, Bressan RA (2014) What are the PANSS items most related with global improvements in patients with schizophrenia? Toward a reduced version of the PANSS. Schizophr Res 158(1–3):277–278. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA (1987) The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13(2):261–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leucht S, Kane JM, Etschel E, Kissling W, Hamann J, Engel RR (2006) Linking the PANSS, BPRS, and CGI: clinical implications. Neuropsychopharmacology 31(10):2318–2325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leucht S, Kane JM, Kissling W, Hamann J, Etschel E, Engel RR (2005) What does the PANSS mean? Schizophr Res 79(2–3):231–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Samara MT, Engel RR, Millier A, Kandenwein J, Toumi M, Leucht S (2014) Equipercentile linking of scales measuring functioning and symptoms: examining the GAF, SOFAS, CGI-S, and PANSS. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 24(11):1767–1772. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.08.009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Riehle M, Jung E, Wiesjahn M, Mehl S, Rief W, Lincoln TM (2015) What’s in an item? Predicting social outcomes in schizophrenia spectrum disorders from the PANSS item “Poor Rapport”. Schizophr Res 168(1–2):593–594. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rabinowitz J, Levine S, Martinez G (2010) Concordance between measures of functioning, symptoms, and change: examining the GAF, CGI-S, CGI-C, and PANSS. J Clin Psychopharmacol 30(4):478–480. doi:10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181e7145f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suzuki T, Uchida H, Sakurai H, Ishizuki T, Tsunoda K, Takeuchi H, Mimura M (2015) Relationships between global assessment of functioning and other rating scales in clinical trials for schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 227(2–3):265–269. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karow A, Moritz S, Lambert M, Schoder S, Krausz M (2005) PANSS syndromes and quality of life in schizophrenia. Pschopathology 38(6):320–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambert M, Naber D, Karow A, Huber CG, Kohler J, Heymann J, Schimmelmann BG (2009) Subjective wellbeing under quetiapine treatment: effect of diagnosis, mood state, and anxiety. Schizophr Res 110(1–3):72–79. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter R, Barry S (2012) Negative symptoms and psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia: neglected but important targets for treatment. Eur Psychiatry 27(6):432–436. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.02.015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Llorca PM, Blanc O, Samalin L, Bosia M, Cavallaro R (2012) Factors involved in the level of functioning of patients with schizophrenia according to latent variable modeling. Eur Psychiatry 27(6):396–400. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. APA (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), Fourth edn. American Psychiatric Publishing, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huber CG, Hochstrasser L, Meister K, Schimmelmann BG, Lambert M (2016) Evidence for an agitated-aggressive syndrome in early-onset psychosis correlated with antisocial personality disorder, forensic history, and substance use disorder. Schizophr Res 175(1–3):198–203. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lambert M, Bock T, Schottle D, Golks D, Meister K, Rietschel L, Bussopulos A, Frieling M, Schodlbauer M, Burlon M, Huber CG, Ohm G, Pakrasi M, Chirazi-Stark MS, Naber D, Schimmelmann BG (2010) Assertive community treatment as part of integrated care versus standard care: a 12-month trial in patients with first- and multiple-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with quetiapine immediate release (ACCESS trial). J Clin Psychiatry 71(10):1313–1323. doi:10.4088/JCP.09m05113yel

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis JM, Chen N (2001) The effects of olanzapine on the 5 dimensions of schizophrenia derived by factor analysis: combined results of the North American and international trials. J Clin Psychiatry 62(10):757–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huber CG, Smieskova R, Schroeder K, Studerus E, Harrisberger F, Aston J, Walter A, Walter A, Riecher-Rössler A, Borgwardt S (2014) Evidence for an agitated–aggressive syndrome predating the onset of psychosis. Schizophr Res. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2014.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guy W (1976) Clinical global impression. In: Guy W (ed.) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, revised, National Insitute of Mental Health, Rockville, pp 217–222

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jones SH, Thornicroft G, Coffey M, Dunn G (1995) A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the global assessment of functioning (GAF). Br J Psychiatry 166(5):654–659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Naber D (1995) A self-rating to measure subjective effects of neuroleptic drugs, relationships to objective psychopathology, quality of life, compliance and other clinical variables. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 10:133–138. doi:10.1097/00004850-199509000-00017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tohen M, Hennen J, Zarate CM Jr, Baldessarini RJ, Strakowski SM, Stoll AL, Faedda GL, Suppes T, Gebre-Medhin P, Cohen BM (2000) Two-year syndromal and functional recovery in 219 cases of first-episode major affective disorder with psychotic features. Am J Psychiatry 157(2):220–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ventura J, Liberman RP, Green MF, Shaner A, Mintz J (1998) Training and quality assurance with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/P). Psychiatry Res 79(2):163–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis : modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Hedges LV (2007) Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs. J Educ Behav Stat 32(4):341–370. doi:10.3102/1076998606298043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, Ugolini S, Pioli R (2000) Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV social and occupational functioning assessment scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand 101(4):323–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Karow A, Pajonk FG, Reimer J, Hirdes F, Osterwald C, Naber D, Moritz S (2008) The dilemma of insight into illness in schizophrenia: self- and expert-rated insight and quality of life. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258(3):152–159. doi:10.1007/s00406-007-0768-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuesta MJ, Peralta V, Zarzuela A (1998) Psychopathological dimensions and lack of insight in schizophrenia. Psychol Rep 83(3 Pt 1):895–898. doi:10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3.895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Study OB-026/06 received no specific Grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Studies 2465/05 and 2515/05 were investigator initiated trials partly funded by AstraZeneca GmbH. The funding agency had no role in the design of the current study; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Authors’ contributions

LH and CGH designed the current study protocol (post-hoc analyses). ML, BGS, and CGH designed the original study protocols and supervised data collection. LH and CGH analyzed and interpreted the data, and LH wrote the initial draft of the paper. SB, UEL, and RS contributed supervisory support to the analysis. All authors have contributed to read and approved the final version of the manuscript. LH and CGH had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Hochstrasser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hochstrasser, L., Borgwardt, S., Lambert, M. et al. The association of psychopathology with concurrent level of functioning and subjective well-being in persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 268, 455–459 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-017-0780-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-017-0780-3

Keywords

Navigation