Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the present study was the application and comparison of common remission and recovery criteria between patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) under inclusion of other outcome parameters. Patients with schizophrenia and MDD who were treated as inpatients at the beginning of the study were examined within two naturalistic follow-up trials from admission to discharge of an inpatient treatment period and the one-year follow-up assessment. PANSS criteria of the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) for schizophrenia and HAMD criteria of the ACNP Task Force in MDD for depressive patients as well as the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) were applied as symptomatic outcome measures additionally to functional outcome parameters. Data of 153 schizophrenia patients and 231 patients with a MDD episode have been included in the analysis. More depressive than schizophrenia patients reached a threshold score of ≤3 on the CGI-S, indicating symptomatic remission at discharge and at the one-year follow-up. In contrast similar proportions of patients reaching symptomatic remission at discharge from inpatient treatment and at the one-year follow-up in the schizophrenia and in the MDD group were found when disease-related consensus criteria (RSWG vs. ACNP Task Force) were used. Functional remission and recovery rates were significantly lower in schizophrenia than in depressive patients at the one-year follow-up visit. Common outcome criteria for remission and recovery in schizophrenia and major depression were not directly comparable. However, our results indicated a significantly poorer outcome in schizophrenia than in depressive patients according to terms of remission and recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moller HJ (2008) Systematic of psychiatric disorders between categorical and dimensional approaches: Kraepelin’s dichotomy and beyond. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258(Suppl 2):48–73. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-2004-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moller HJ, Jager M, Riedel M, Obermeier M, Strauss A, Bottlender R (2010) The Munich 15-year follow-up study (MUFUSSAD) on first-hospitalized patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders: comparison of psychopathological and psychosocial course and outcome and prediction of chronicity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 260(5):367–384. doi:10.1007/s00406-010-0117-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moller HJ, Jager M, Riedel M, Obermeier M, Strauss A, Bottlender R (2011) The Munich 15-year follow-up study (MUFUSSAD) on first-hospitalized patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders: assessing courses, types and time stability of diagnostic classification. Eur Psychiatry 26(4):231–243. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrow M, Grossman LS, Herbener ES, Davies EW (2000) Ten-year outcome: patients with schizoaffective disorders, schizophrenia, affective disorders and mood-incongruent psychotic symptoms. Br J Psychiatry 177:421–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Craddock N, Owen MJ (2005) The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy. Br J Psychiatry 186:364–366. doi:10.1192/bjp.186.5.364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Craddock N, Owen MJ (2010) The Kraepelinian dichotomy—going, going… but still not gone. Br J Psychiatry 196(2):92–95. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.073429

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Moskvina V, Craddock N, Holmans P, Nikolov I, Pahwa JS, Green E, Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC (2009) Gene-wide analyses of genome-wide association data sets: evidence for multiple common risk alleles for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and for overlap in genetic risk. Mol Psychiatry 14(3):252–260. doi:10.1038/mp.2008.133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Donovan MC, Craddock N, Norton N, Williams H, Peirce T, Moskvina V, Nikolov I, Hamshere M, Carroll L, Georgieva L, Dwyer S, Holmans P, Marchini JL, Spencer CC, Howie B, Leung HT, Hartmann AM, Moller HJ, Morris DW, Shi Y, Feng G, Hoffmann P, Propping P, Vasilescu C, Maier W, Rietschel M, Zammit S, Schumacher J, Quinn EM, Schulze TG, Williams NM, Giegling I, Iwata N, Ikeda M, Darvasi A, Shifman S, He L, Duan J, Sanders AR, Levinson DF, Gejman PV, Cichon S, Nothen MM, Gill M, Corvin A, Rujescu D, Kirov G, Owen MJ, Buccola NG, Mowry BJ, Freedman R, Amin F, Black DW, Silverman JM, Byerley WF, Cloninger CR (2008) Identification of loci associated with schizophrenia by genome-wide association and follow-up. Nat Genet 40(9):1053–1055. doi:10.1038/ng.201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peerbooms OL, van Os J, Drukker M, Kenis G, Hoogveld L, de Hert M, Delespaul P, van Winkel R, Rutten BP (2011) Meta-analysis of MTHFR gene variants in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and unipolar depressive disorder: evidence for a common genetic vulnerability? Brain Behav Immun 25(8):1530–1543. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2010.12.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Purcell SM, Wray NR, Stone JL, Visscher PM, O’Donovan MC, Sullivan PF, Sklar P (2009) Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature 460(7256):748–752. doi:10.1038/nature08185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Network and Pathway Analysis Subgroup of Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2015) Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways. Nat Neurosci 18(2):199–209. doi: 10.1038/nn.3922

  12. Hafner H, Maurer K, Trendler G, an der Heiden W, Schmidt M, Konnecke R (2005) Schizophrenia and depression: challenging the paradigm of two separate diseases–a controlled study of schizophrenia, depression and healthy controls. Schizophr Res 77(1):11–24. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moller HJ, Bandelow B, Bauer M, Hampel H, Herpertz SC, Soyka M, Barnikol UB, Lista S, Severus E, Maier W (2015) DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences–part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 265(1):5–18. doi:10.1007/s00406-014-0520-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moller HJ, Bandelow B, Bauer M, Hampel H, Herpertz SC, Soyka M, Barnikol UB, Lista S, Severus E, Maier W (2015) DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences-part 2: bipolar disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, personality disorders, substance-related and addictive disorders, neurocognitive disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 265(2):87–106. doi:10.1007/s00406-014-0521-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andreasen NC, Carpenter WT Jr, Kane JM, Lasser RA, Marder SR, Weinberger DR (2005) Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus. Am J Psychiatry 162(3):441–449. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rush AJ, Kraemer HC, Sackeim HA, Fava M, Trivedi MH, Frank E, Ninan PT, Thase ME, Gelenberg AJ, Kupfer DJ, Regier DA, Rosenbaum JF, Ray O, Schatzberg AF (2006) Report by the ACNP task force on response and remission in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 31(9):1841–1853. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Corrigan PW (2006) Recovery from schizophrenia and the role of evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Expert Rev Neurother 6(7):993–1004. doi:10.1586/14737175.6.7.993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liberman RP, Kopelowicz A (2005) Recovery from schizophrenia: a concept in search of research. Psychiatr Serv 56(6):735–742. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.6.735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Greer TL, Kurian BT, Trivedi MH (2010) Defining and measuring functional recovery from depression. CNS Drugs 24(4):267–284. doi:10.2165/11530230-000000000-00000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wittchen HUWU, Gruschwitz S, Zaudig M (1997) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cording CGW, Spengler A (1995) The new psychiatric basic documentation. A recommendation by the DGPPN for quality assurance in inpatient treatment. Spektrum Psychiatrie Nervenheilkunde 24:3–41

    Google Scholar 

  22. Guy W (1976) ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology—Revised (DHEW Publ No ADM 76–338). Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, pp 218–222

  23. Kay SR, Opler LA, Lindenmayer JP (1988) Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics. Psychiatry Res 23(1):99–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 6(4):278–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patterson DA, Lee MS (1995) Field trial of the global assessment of functioning scale-modified. Am J Psychiatry 152(9):1386–1388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roy-Byrne P, Dagadakis C, Unutzer J, Ries R (1996) Evidence for limited validity of the revised global assessment of functioning scale. Psychiatr Serv 47(8):864–866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leucht S (2014) Measurements of response, remission, and recovery in schizophrenia and examples for their clinical application. J Clin Psychiatry 75(Suppl 1):8–14. doi:10.4088/JCP.13049su1c.02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lieberman JA, Phillips M, Gu H, Stroup S, Zhang P, Kong L, Ji Z, Koch G, Hamer RM (2003) A typical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in treatment-naive first-episode schizophrenia: a 52-week randomized trial of clozapine versus chlorpromazine. Neuropsychopharmacology 28(5):995–1003. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lieberman J, Jody D, Geisler S, Alvir J, Loebel A, Szymanski S, Woerner M, Borenstein M (1993) Time course and biologic correlates of treatment response in first-episode schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50(5):369–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schennach-Wolff R, Moller HJ, Jager M, Seemuller F, Obermeier M, Messer T, Laux G, Pfeiffer H, Naber D, Schmidt LG, Gaebel W, Klosterkotter J, Heuser I, Maier W, Lemke MR, Ruther E, Klingberg S, Gastpar M, Riedel M (2010) A critical analysis and discussion of the appropriateness of the schizophrenia consensus remission criteria in clinical pharmaceutical trials. Pharmacopsychiatry 43(7):245–251. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1262788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pinna F, Tusconi M, Bosia M, Cavallaro R, Carpiniello B (2013) Criteria for symptom remission revisited: a study of patients affected by schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders. BMC Psychiatry 13(1):235. doi:10.1186/1471-244x-13-235

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lambert M, Karow A, Leucht S, Schimmelmann BG, Naber D (2010) Remission in schizophrenia: validity, frequency, predictors, and patients’ perspective 5 years later. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 12(3):393–407

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Marneros A, Deister A, Rohde A (1992) Comparison of long-term outcome of schizophrenic, affective and schizoaffective disorders. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 18:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marneros A, Rohde A, Deister A (1998) Frequency and phenomenology of persisting alterations in affective, schizoaffective and schizophrenic disorders: a comparison. Psychopathology 31(1):23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bottlender R, Strauss A, Moller HJ (2013) Association between psychopathology and problems of psychosocial functioning in the long-term outcome of patients diagnosed with schizophrenic, schizoaffective and affective disorders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 263(2):85–92. doi:10.1007/s00406-012-0335-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrow M, Grossman LS, Jobe TH, Herbener ES (2005) Do patients with schizophrenia ever show periods of recovery? A 15-year multi-follow-up study. Schizophr Bull 31(3):723–734. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bottlender R, Strauss A, Moller HJ (2010) Social disability in schizophrenic, schizoaffective and affective disorders 15 years after first admission. Schizophr Res 116(1):9–15. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McGlashan TH (1984) The chestnut lodge follow-up study. I. Follow-up methodology and study sample. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41(6):573–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tsuang MT, Woolson RF, Winokur G, Crowe RR (1981) Stability of psychiatric diagnosis. Schizophrenia and affective disorders followed up over a 30- to 40-year period. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38(5):535–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moller HJ, Hohe-Schramm M, Cording-Tommel C, Schmid-Bode W, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M, von Zerssen D (1989) The classification of functional psychoses and its implications for prognosis. Br J Psychiatry 154:467–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moller HJ, Schmid-Bode W, Cording-Tommel C, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M, von Zerssen D (1988) Psychopathological and social outcome in schizophrenia versus affective/schizoaffective psychoses and prediction of poor outcome in schizophrenia. Results from a 5–8 year follow-up. Acta Psychiatr Scand 77(4):379–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lasser RA, Bossie CA, Gharabawi GM, Kane JM (2005) Remission in schizophrenia: results from a 1-year study of long-acting risperidone injection. Schizophr Res 77(2–3):215–227. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sethuraman G, Taylor CC, Enerson M, Dunayevich E (2005) A retrospective comparison of cumulative time spent in remission during treatment with olanzapine or risperidone among patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 79(2–3):337–340. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Petersen L, Nordentoft M, Jeppesen P, Ohlenschaeger J, Thorup A, Christensen TO, Krarup G, Dahlstrom J, Haastrup B, Jorgensen P (2005) Improving 1-year outcome in first-episode psychosis: OPUS trial. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 48:s98–103. doi:10.1192/bjp.187.48.s98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was performed within the framework of the German Research Network on Schizophrenia and Depression, which was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research BMBF (01GI0233 and 01GI0219). The BMBF had no further role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilja Spellmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spellmann, I., Schennach, R., Seemüller, F. et al. Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 267, 303–313 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2

Keywords

Navigation