Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How much stress is needed to increase vulnerability to psychosis? A community assessment of psychic experiences (CAPE) evaluation 10 months after an earthquake in L’Aquila (Italy)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since severe stress can induce mental disorder symptoms that interact with vulnerability factors, the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) was evaluated in a population of 419 young adults who survived an earthquake; results were compared to a database of 1,057 ‘non-exposed’ subjects. Unexpectedly, earthquake survivors showed lower CAPE scores for ‘small’ to ‘medium’ effect size. Post-trauma positive changes or re-appraisal for successful adaptation may explain these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bromet E, Dew MA (1995) Review of psychiatric epidemiologic research on disasters. Epidemiol Rev 17:113–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cougnard A, Marcelis M, Myin-Germeys I, De Graaf R, Vollebergh W, Krabbendam L, Lieb R, Wittchen HU, Henquet C, Spauwen J, Van Os J (2007) Does normal developmental expression of psychosis combine with environmental risk to cause persistence of psychosis? A psychosis proneness-persistence model. Psychol Med 37:513–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Daneluzzo E, Di Tommaso S, Pacifico R, Stratta P, Rossi A (2009) Dimensional, non-taxonic latent structure of psychotic symptoms in a student sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 44:911–916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Foa EB, Stein DJ, McFarlane AC (2006) Symptomatology and psychopathology of mental health problems after disaster. J Clin Psychiatry 67:15–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanssen MS, Peeters F, Krabbendam L, Radstake S, Verdoux H, van Os J (2003) How psychotic are individuals with non-psychotic disorders? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 38:149–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Houston JE, Shevlin M, Adamson G, Murphy J (2011) A person-centred approach to modelling population experiences of trauma and mental illness. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46:149–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones SR, Fernyhough CA (2007) New look at the neural diathesis–stress model of schizophrenia: the primacy of social-evaluative and uncontrollable situations. Schizophr Bull 33:1171–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz CL, Pellegrino L, Pandya A, Ng A, DeLisi LE (2002) Research on psychiatric outcomes and interventions subsequent to disasters: a review of the literature. Psychiatr Res 110:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Konings M, Bak M, Hanssen M, van Os J, Krabbendam L (2006) Validity and reliability of the CAPE: a self report instrument for the measurement of psychotic experiences in the general population. Acta Psychiatr Scand 114:55–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mc Kenzie K, Whitley R, Weich S (2002) Social capital and mental health. Br J Psychiatry 181:280–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Myin-Germeys I, van Os J (2007) Stress-reactivity in psychosis: evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis. Clin Psychol Rev 27:409–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nuechterlein KH, Dawson ME (1984) A heuristic vulnerability/stress model of schizophrenic episodes. Schiz Bull 10:300–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi A, Stratta P, Allegrini F (2010) Changes in prescription of psychotropics after an earthquake in Italy. Psychiatr Serv 61:845–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Selten JP, Cantor-Graae E (2007) Hypothesis: social defeat is a risk factor for schizophrenia? Br J Psychiatry 191(Supplement 51):9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shevlin M, Houston JE, Dorahy MJ, Adamson G (2008) Cumulative traumas and psychosis: an analysis of the national comorbidity survey and the British psychiatric morbidity survey. Schizophr Bull 34:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spauwen J, Krabbendam L, Lieb R, Wittchen HU, van Os J (2006) Impact of psychological trauma on the development of psychotic symptoms: relationship with psychosis proneness. Br J Psychiatry 188:527–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stefanis NC, Hanssen M, Smirnis NK, Avramopoulos DA, Evdokimidis IK, Stefanis CN et al (2002) Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population. Psychol Med 32:347–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van Winkel R, Stefanis NC, Myin-Germeys I (2008) Psychosocial stress and psychosis. A review of the neurobiological mechanisms and the evidence for gene-stress interaction. Schizophr Bull 34:1095–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zoellner T, Maercker A (2006) Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology: a critical review and introduction of a two component model. Clin Psychol Rev 26:626–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zubin J, Spring B (1977) Vulnerability: a new view of schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 86:103–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict on interest. No funding has been received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Rossi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossi, A., di Tommaso, S., Stratta, P. et al. How much stress is needed to increase vulnerability to psychosis? A community assessment of psychic experiences (CAPE) evaluation 10 months after an earthquake in L’Aquila (Italy). Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 262, 265–268 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-011-0258-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-011-0258-7

Keywords

Navigation