Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of CRSwNP in the real-life setting: a review of the literature

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The recent approval of Dupilumab has profoundly revolutionized the management of patients affected by severe and recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). However, a review that summarizes the results of real-life studies and compares them to phase 3 studies SINUS-24 and 52 is still lacking.

Materials and methods

A search of all real-life studies published from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Patients characteristics at baseline and 6 and 12 months after starting Dupilumab were extracted and compared to those from phase 3 trials: age, sex, smoking habits, comorbid asthma and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), previous endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), hematic eosinophils and total IgE, NasalAQ2 Polyps Score (NPS), smell, SNOT-22, adverse events (AEs), and response to treatment.

Results

15 papers were included with an overall number of 1658 patients. A higher rate of comorbidities and previous ESS was found in patients from real-life studies. In addition, they had worse smell and SNOT-22 at baseline compared to patients from SINUS-24 and 52. Comorbid and post-ESS patients tended to have a faster NPS and SNOT-22 improvement, although the absolute values were not clinically relevant. A more extensive surgery and a number of ESS ≥ 2 were related to worse olfactory outcomes, probably due to iatrogenic damage. No correlation was found between hematic eosinophils and outcomes. AEs were reported by 12.4% of patients and 2.2% had to discontinue dupilumab. Weight gain was an emergent AE (0.8%), probably related to the restored sense of smell and taste. Non-responders were 3.5% and they were switched to systemic steroid, ESS, or another biologic.

Conclusion

Despite some differences in prescription criteria between countries, dupilumab was demonstrated to be effective even in the real-life scenario. However, emerging AEs and possible unknown long-term AEs of a likely lifelong therapy should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data supporting this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Kato A, Peters AT, Stevens WW et al (2022) Endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis: relationships to disease phenotypes, pathogenesis, clinical findings, and treatment approaches. Allergy 77(3):812–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Han X, Wu D, Sun Z et al (2020) Type 1/type 2 inflammatory cytokines correlate with olfactory function in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Otolaryngol 41(5):102587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattos JL, Schlosser RJ, Storck KA, Soler ZM (2017) Understanding the relationship between olfactory-specific quality of life, objective olfactory loss, and patient factors in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7(7):734–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21940

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Frasnelli J, Hummel T (2005) Olfactory dysfunction and daily life. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262(3):231–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-004-0796-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mattos JL, Schlosser RJ, DeConde AS et al (2018) Factor analysis of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8(7):777–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Samitas K, Carter A, Kariyawasam HH, Xanthou G (2018) Upper and lower airway remodelling mechanisms in asthma, allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis: the one airway concept revisited. Allergy 73(5):993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Håkansson K, Thomsen SF, Konge L et al (2014) A comparative and descriptive study of asthma in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28(5):383–387. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmans R, Wagemakers A, van Drunen C et al (2018) Acute and chronic rhinosinusitis and allergic rhinitis in relation to comorbidity, ethnicity and environment. PLoS One 13(2):e0192330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Stevens WW, Peters AT, Hirsch AG et al (2017) Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma, and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 5(4):1061-1070.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Alsharif S, Jonstam K, van Zele T et al (2019) Endoscopic sinus surgery for type-2 CRS wNP: an endotype-based retrospective study. Laryngoscope 129(6):1286–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wechsler ME (2013) Inhibiting interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 in difficult-to-control asthma. N Engl J Med 368(26):2511–2513. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1305426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bachert C, Han JK, Desrosiers M et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials. Lancet 394(10209):1638–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31881-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Corso E, Settimi S, Montuori C et al (2022) Effectiveness of Dupilumab in the treatment of patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: a “real-life” observational study in the first year of treatment. J Clin Med 11(10):2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ottaviano G, Saccardo T, Roccuzzo G et al (2022) Effectiveness of Dupilumab in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled severe CRSwNP: a “real-life” observational study in naïve and post-surgical patients. J Pers Med 12(9):1526. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091526

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Lans RJL, Fokkens WJ, Adriaensen GFJPM et al (2022) Real-life observational cohort verifies high efficacy of dupilumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Allergy. 77(2):670–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nettis E, Brussino L, Patella V et al (2022) Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and associated comorbidities: a multicentric prospective study in real life. Clin Mol Allergy 20(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-022-00171-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL, Hadley JA et al (2006) Rhinosinusitis: developing guidance for clinical trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118(5 Suppl):S17–S61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP (2009) Psychometric validity of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test. Clin Otolaryngol 34(5):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lund VJ, Mackay IS (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology 31(4):183–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kilty SJ, Lasso A (2022) Canadian real-world study of access and clinical results using dupilumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 51(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-022-00570-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Grose E, Li AY, Lee JM (2023) Clinical outcomes of dupilumab therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a Canadian tertiary care rhinology practice. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 19(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00782-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jansen F, Becker B, Eden JK et al (2023) Dupilumab (Dupixent®) tends to be an effective therapy for uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: real data of a single-centered, retrospective single-arm longitudinal study from a university hospital in Germany. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280(4):1741–1755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07679-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boscke R, Heidemann M, Bruchhage KL (2023) Dupilumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: real-life retrospective 12-month effectiveness data. Rhinology 61(3):203–213. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin22.469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Corso E, Pasquini E, Trimarchi M et al (2023) Dupilumab in the treatment of severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP): a multicentric observational phase IV real-life study (DUPIREAL). Allergy 78(10):2669–2683. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Galletti C, Barbieri MA, Ciodaro F et al (2023) Effectiveness and safety profile of Dupilumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: real-life data in tertiary care. Pharmaceuticals 16(4):630. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Albrecht T, Sailer MM, Capitani F et al (2023) Real-world evidence for the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP after 1 year of therapy. World Allergy Organ J 16(5):100780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. van der Lans RJL, Otten JJ, Adriaensen GFJPM et al (2023) Two-year results of tapered dupilumab for CRSwNP demonstrates enduring efficacy established in the first 6 months. Allergy 78(10):2684–2697. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pecorari G, Piazza F, Borgione M et al (2023) The role of intranasal corticosteroids in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis treated with dupilumab. Am J Otolaryngol 44(5):103927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertlich M, Freytag S, Dombrowski T et al (2022) Subgroups in the treatment of nasal polyposis with dupilumab: a retrospective study. Medicine 101(45):e31031. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Campion NJ, Brugger J, Tu A et al (2023) The “real life” efficacy of dupilumab is independent of initial polyp size and concomitant steroids in CRSwNP. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 52(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00663-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Giombi F, Pace GM, Nappi E et al (2023) Radiological versus clinical 1-year outcomes of Dupilumab in refractory CRSwNP: a real-life study. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Orlando P, Licci G, Kuitche D et al (2023) Effectiveness of dupilumab versus endoscopic sinus surgery for the treatment of type-2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a preliminary report. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08309-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bellocchi G, Loperfido A, Passali FM et al (2023) Biologics in severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a bicentric experience. Acta Biomed 94(5):e2023227. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v94i5.14745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmale IL, Poulakis A, Abend A, Luitje ME, Man LX (2023) Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis treated with Dupilumab: real-world use and outcomes. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 11(10):3203–3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mocellin D, Ioppi A, Gaglio G et al (2023) Severe chronic rhinosinusitis treated with dupilumab, a real-life analysis of early effectiveness. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 27(15):7324–7336. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202308_33304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Laidlaw TM, Bachert C, Amin N et al (2021) Dupilumab improves upper and lower airway disease control in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 126(5):584-592.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2021.01.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C et al (2020) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinol 58(Suppl S29):1–464. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin20.600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rollema C, van Roon EN, Ekhart C et al (2022) Adverse drug reactions of intranasal corticosteroids in the Netherlands: an analysis from the Netherlands pharmacovigilance center. Drugs Real World Outcomes 9(3):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-022-00301-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Minagawa S, Araya J, Watanabe N et al (2022) Real-life effectiveness of dupilumab in patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma comorbid with CRSwNP. BMC Pulm Med 22(1):258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02046-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hopkins C, Wagenmann M, Bachert C et al (2021) Efficacy of dupilumab in patients with a history of prior sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 11(7):1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22780

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Marchioni D, Pipolo C et al (2023) Influence of prior endoscopic sinus surgery extent on dupilumab effectiveness in CRSwNP patients. Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Krings JG, Kallogjeri D, Wineland A et al (2014) Complications of primary and revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 124(4):838–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bhattacharyya N (2004) Clinical outcomes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(8):975–978. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.8.975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fokkens WJ, Viskens AS, Backer V et al (2023) EPOS/EUFOREA update on indication and evaluation of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps 2023. Rhinology 61(3):194–202. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin22.489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Caminati M, Olivieri B, Dama A et al (2022) Dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia: review of the literature and algorithm proposal for clinical management. Expert Rev Respir Med 16(7):713–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2022.2090342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vinciguerra A, Rampi A, Yacoub MR et al (2022) Hypereosinophilia management in patients with type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis treated with dupilumab: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279(11):5231–5238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07389-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Darkhal P, Gao M, Ma Y, Liu D (2015) Blocking high-fat diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance and fatty liver by overexpression of Il-13 gene in mice. Int J Obes 39(8):1292–1299. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Qiu Y, Nguyen KD, Odegaard JI et al (2014) Eosinophils and type 2 cytokine signaling in macrophages orchestrate development of functional beige fat. Cell 157(6):1292–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Scangas GA, Wu AW, Ting JY et al (2021) Cost utility analysis of dupilumab versus endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Laryngoscope 131(1):E26–E33. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Orlando.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reale, M., Licci, G., Orlando, P. et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of CRSwNP in the real-life setting: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08725-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08725-7

Keywords

Navigation