Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parotid cancer: analysis of preoperative parameters for adaptation of the therapeutic strategy

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To establish typical clinical and radiological profiles of primary low-grade parotid cancers in order to tailor therapeutic strategy.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study of 57 patients operated on for primary parotid cancer between 2010 and 2021, with review of preoperative MRI and histopathology according to a standardized scoring grid.

Objective

To study prognostic factors and determine the preoperative clinical and radiological profile of low-grade cancers.

Results

Good prognostic factors for specific survival were: staging ≤ cT3 (p = 0.014), absence of adenopathy on cN0 MRI (p < 0.001), superficial lobe location (p = 0.033), pN0 (p < 0.001), absence of capsular rupture (p = 0.004), as well as the absence of peri-tumoral nodules (p = 0.033), intra-parotid adenopathies (p < 0.001), vascular emboli (p < 0.001), peri-neural sheathing (p = 0.016), nuclear atypia (p = 0.031), and necrosis (p = 0.002). It was not possible to define a reliable clinical and radiological profile for low-grade cancers (sensitivity 38%, specificity 79%).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated multiple factors of good prognosis, but it was not possible to define a clinical and radiological profile of patients likely to benefit from more limited surgery, nor to diagnose, a priori, low-grade cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maahs GS, de Oppermann PO, Maahs LGP, Machado Filho G, Ronchi AD (2015) Parotid gland tumors: a retrospective study of 154 patients. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 81(3):301–306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Comoglu S, Ozturk E, Celik M, Avci H, Sonmez S, Basaran B et al (2018) Comprehensive analysis of parotid mass: a retrospective study of 369 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx 45(2):320–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parikh AS, Khawaja A, Puram SV, Srikanth P, Tjoa T, Lee H et al (2019) Outcomes and prognostic factors in parotid gland malignancies: a 10-year single center experience. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 4(6):632–639

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Coudert H, Mirafzal S, Dissard A, Boyer L, Montoriol PF (2021) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of parotid tumors: a systematic review. Diagn Interv Imaging 102(3):121–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fakhry N, Santini L, Lagier A, Dessi P, Giovanni A (2014) Fine needle aspiration cytology and frozen section in the diagnosis of malignant parotid tumours. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(7):802–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Argumentaire_REFCOR_cancers_salivaires_2022.pdf. Disponible sur: https://www.sforl.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Argumentaire_REFCOR_cancers_salivaires_2022.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2023.

  7. Karp EE, Garcia JJ, Chan SA, Van Abel KM, Moore EJ, Janus JR et al (2022) The role of total parotidectomy in high-grade parotid malignancy: a multisurgeon retrospective review. Am J Otolaryngol 43(1):103194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Herpen C, Vander Poorten V, Skalova A, Terhaard C, Maroldi R, van Engen A et al (2022) Salivary gland cancer: ESMO–European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers (EURACAN) clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 7(6):100602

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim YC, Lee SY, Kim K, Lee JS, Koo BS, Shin HA et al (2005) Conservative parotidectomy for the treatment of parotid cancers. Oral Oncol 41(10):1021–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Romano A, Cama A, Corvino R, Graziano P, Friscia M, Iaconetta G et al (2017) Complications after parotid gland surgery our experience. Ann Ital Chir 88:295–301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roh JL, Kim HS, Park CI (2007) Randomized clinical trial comparing partial parotidectomy versus superficial or total parotidectomy. Br J Surg 94(9):1081–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baba A, Kessoku H, Akutsu T, Shimura E, Matsushima S, Kurokawa R et al (2021) Pre-treatment MRI predictor of high-grade malignant parotid gland cancer. Oral Radiol 37(4):611–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang Q, Wu J, Liu F (2019) Oncologic outcome and potential prognostic factors in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the parotid gland. BMC Cancer 19(1):752

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakaguro M, Sato Y, Tada Y, Kawakita D, Hirai H, Urano M et al (2020) Prognostic implication of histopathologic indicators in salivary duct carcinoma: proposal of a novel histologic risk stratification model. Am J Surg Pathol 44(4):526–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen SR, Bjørndal K, Godballe C, Krogdahl A (2012) Prognostic significance of Ki-67 in salivary gland carcinomas. J Oral Pathol Med 41(8):598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kashiwagi N, Dote K, Kawano K, Tomita Y, Murakami T, Nakanishi K et al (2012) MRI findings of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland: correlation with pathological features. Br J Radiol 85(1014):709–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim SY, Borner U, Lee JH, Wagner F, Tshering Vogel DW (2022) Magnetic resonance imaging of parotid gland tumors: a pictorial essay. BMC Med Imaging 22(1):191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Freling N, Crippa F, Maroldi R (2016) Staging and follow-up of high-grade malignant salivary gland tumours: The role of traditional versus functional imaging approaches—a review. Oral Oncol 60:157–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Razek AAKA, Nada N (2016) Correlation of choline/creatine and apparent diffusion coefficient values with the prognostic parameters of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. NMR Biomed 29(4):483–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Terakedis BE, Hunt JP, Buchmann LO, Avizonis VN, Anker CJ, Hitchcock YJ (2017) The prognostic significance of facial nerve involvement in carcinomas of the parotid gland. Am J Clin Oncol 40(3):323–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdel Razek AAK, Elkhamary SM, Nada N (2019) Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histopathological parameters of salivary gland cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(8):995–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park GC, Roh JL, Cho KJ, Jin MH, Jung YG, Lee HW et al (2020) Clinically node-negative parotid gland cancers: prognostic factors of survival and surgical extent. OCL 98(2):102–110

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lima RA, Tavares MR, Dias FL, Kligerman J, Nascimento MF, Barbosa MM et al (2005) Clinical prognostic factors in malignant parotid gland tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(5):702–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vander Poorten V, Guntinas-Lichius O (2016) Prognostic scoring for malignant salivary gland neoplasms. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 78:71–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bär B, Mantsopoulos K, Iro H (2020) Paradigm shift in surgery for benign parotid tumors: 19 years of experience with almost 3000 cases. Laryngoscope 130(8):1941–1946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. He Z, Mao Y, Lu S, Tan L, Xiao J, Tan P et al (2022) Machine learning-based radiomics for histological classification of parotid tumors using morphological MRI: a comparative study. Eur Radiol 32(12):8099–8110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fakhry N, Antonini F, Michel J, Penicaud M, Mancini J, Lagier A et al (2012) Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the management of parotid masses: evaluation of 249 patients. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 129(3):131–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laccourreye O, Gaultier AL, Haroun F, Lepine C, Malinvaud D, Mirghani H (2022) Positive predictive values of MRI and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for isolated parotid swelling in adults: a STARD comparative analysis. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 139(5):269–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nishikawa S, Kawata R, Higashino M, Lee K, Terada T, Kurisu Y et al (2015) Assessing the histological type and grade of primary parotid carcinoma by fine-needle aspiration and frozen section. Auris Nasus Larynx 42(6):463–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Colaianni CA, Richmon JD (2021) Cosmetic approaches to parotidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 54(3):583–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yuen APW (2016) Small access postaural parotidectomy: an analysis of techniques, feasibility and safety. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:1879–1883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roch M, Mauvais O, Vergez S, Brenet E, Lindas P, Toussaint B et al (2022) Is revision surgery necessary for patients with high risk of recurrence after parotidectomy? A multicenter retrospective study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 131(7):782–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Samia Ghenni or Nicolas Fakhry.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1: Abbreviations of histological types

Abbreviation

Meaning

NET

Neuroendocrine tumor

MEC

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma

CAK

Adenoid cystic carcinoma

ACC

Acinar cell carcinoma

EMC

Epithelial–myoepithelial carcinoma

MeC

Myoepithelial carcinoma

SCC

Squamous cell carcinoma

BCC

Basal cell carcinoma

ADK

SAI adenocarcinoma (no other indication)

PEC

Pleomorphic ex-adenoma carcinoma

sCC

Small cell carcinoma (high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma)

Appendix 2: MRI review grid

MRI review grid

cT

1

2

3

4a

4b

Sectors

I

II

III

IV

V

Capsule

 

Present

 

Absent

 

Size (mm)

Continuous value starting from 0

ADC

 

≤ 1

 

> 1

 

Lymph nodes

 

N0

 

N+

 

Observation

1

 

2

 

3

Appendix 3: Prognostic factors for the absence recurrence at 2 years

Prognostic factors for the absence of recurrence at 2 years

 

No recurrence N = 231

Recurrence N = 91

p-value2

Gender

0.427

 Male

8 (61.5%)

5 (38.5%)

 

 Female

15 (78.9%)

4 (21.1%)

 

Age

> 0.999

 ≤ 60 years

12 (75.0%)

4 (25.0%)

 

 > 60 years

11 (68.8%)

5 (31.2%)

 

cT3

0.002

 ≤ cT3

18 (90.0%)

2 (10.0%)

 

 > cT3

3 (30.0%)

7 (70.0%)

 

cN

0.195

 cN0

21 (75.0%)

7 (25.0%)

 

 cN+

1 (33.3%)

2 (66.7%)

 

Localization

0.044

 Superficial parotid

13 (92.9%)

1 (7.1%)

 

 Deep parotid

10 (55.6%)

8 (44.4%)

 

Facial paralysis

0.021

 Absent

21 (77.8%)

6 (22.2%)

 

 Present

0 (0.0%)

3 (100.0%)

 

Pain

0.025

 Absent

15 (88.2%)

2 (11.8%)

 

 Present

4 (40.0%)

6 (60.0%)

 

Limited tumor on MRI

0.432

 Yes

7 (58.3%)

5 (41.7%)

 

 No

12 (75.0%)

4 (25.0%)

 

Mean-ADC

0.393

 ≤ 1

6 (60.0%)

4 (40.0%)

 

 > 1

11 (78.6%)

3 (21.4%)

 

pT

< 0.001

 ≤ pT2

19 (95.0%)

1 (5.0%)

 

 > pT2

3 (27.3%)

8 (72.7%)

 

Histological grade

0.013

 Low

11 (100.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 

 High

12 (57.1%)

9 (42.9%)

 

Surgical margins

0.599

 R0

42 (85.7%)

7 (14.3%)

 

 R1

6 (75.0%)

2 (25.0%)

 

Capsular rupture

0.004

 ≤ 3

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

 

 > 3

6 (42.9%)

8 (57.1%)

 

Tumor limits

0.004

 ≤ 3

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

 

 > 3

6 (42.9%)

8 (57.1%)

 

Distant tumor nodules

0.003

 ≤ 3

19 (90.5%)

2 (9.5%)

 

 > 3

4 (36.4%)

7 (63.6%)

 

Intra-parotid lymph nodes

0.010

 ≤ 2

21 (84.0%)

4 (16.0%)

 

 > 2

2 (28.6%)

5 (71.4%)

 

Vascular emboli

0.006

 Absent

18 (90.0%)

2 (10.0%)

 

 Present

5 (41.7%)

7 (58.3%)

 

Perineural infiltration

0.113

 Absent

14 (87.5%)

2 (12.5%)

 

 Present

9 (56.2%)

7 (43.8%)

 

Nuclear atypia

0.002

 Absent

14 (100.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 

 Present

9 (50.0%)

9 (50.0%)

 

Necrosis

0.015

 Absent

17 (89.5%)

2 (10.5%)

 

 Present

6 (46.2%)

7 (53.8%)

 

pN

42 (89.4%)

 

0.076

 pN0

20 (80.0%)

5 (20.0%)

 

 pN+

3 (42.9%)

4 (57.1%)

 
  1. 1n (%); 2Fisher’s exact test

Appendix 4: Low- and high-grade profiles comparison in the sub-population of 32 patients

 

Low grade N = 171

High grade N = 151

p-value

Gender

0.9072

 Male

6 (35.3%)

5 (33.3%)

 

 Female

11 (64.7%)

10 (66.7%)

 

Age

 < 55 years

10 (58.8%)

10 (58.8%)

0.0672

 ≥ 55 years

7 (41.2%)

11 (73.3%)

 

Facial paralysis

 Absent

16 (100.0%)

14 (100.0%)

 

Pain

0.1483

 Absent

13 (92.9%)

8 (66.7%)

 

 Present

1 (7.1%)

4 (33.3%)

 

cT

0.432

 ≤ cT2

9 (52.9%)

10 (66.7%)

 

 > cT2

8 (47.1%)

5 (33.3%)

 

Mean-ADC

0.5472

 < 1

6 (35.3%)

6 (46.2%)

 

 ≥ 1

11 (64.7%)

7 (53.8%)

 

Encapsulated on MRI

0.2433

 Yes

3 (17.6%)

6 (40.0%)

 

 No

14 (82.4%)

9 (60.0%)

 

Localization

> 0.9992

 Superficial parotid

13 (76.5%)

12 (80.0%)

 

 Deep parotid

4 (23.5%)

3 (20.0%)

 
  1. 1n (%); 2Pearson’s Chi2 test; 3Fisher’s exact test

Appendix 5: Results of clinico-radiological concordance with histology for the sub-population of 32 patients

 

Post-operative

 

Low grade without poor prognostic factors N = 13

High grade and/or poor prognostic factors N = 19

Pre-operative

 Criteria in favor of low-grade N = 9

5

4

PPV = 55%

 Criteria in favor of high-grade N = 23

8

15

NPV = 65%

 

Sensitivity = 38%

Specificity = 79%

 

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghenni, S., Del Grande, J., Gravier Dumonceau, R. et al. Parotid cancer: analysis of preoperative parameters for adaptation of the therapeutic strategy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 281, 3207–3218 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08607-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08607-y

Keywords

Navigation