Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A deep learning MRI-based signature may provide risk-stratification strategies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

As the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is influenced by various factors, making it difficult for clinical physicians to predict the outcome, the objective of this study was to develop a deep learning-based signature for risk stratification in NPC patients.

Methods

A total of 293 patients were enrolled in the study and divided into training, validation, and testing groups with a ratio of 7:1:2. MRI scans and corresponding clinical information were collected, and the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) was chosen as the endpoint. The Res-Net18 algorithm was used to develop two deep learning (DL) models and another solely based on clinical characteristics developed by multivariate cox analysis. The performance of both models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and the concordance index (C-index). Discriminative performance was assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.

Results

The deep learning approach identified DL prognostic models. The MRI-based DL model showed significantly better performance compared to the traditional model solely based on clinical characteristics (AUC: 0.8861 vs 0.745, p = 0.04 and C-index: 0.865 vs 0.727, p = 0.03). The survival analysis showed significant survival differences between the risk groups identified by the MRI-based model.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the potential of MRI in predicting the prognosis of NPC through DL algorithm. This approach has the potential to become a novel tool for prognosis prediction and can help physicians to develop more valid treatment strategies in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All patients’ data were collected from The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. We will not disclose the information of patients due to the need of privacy protection, but researchers could obtain relative data by contacting Chen Yang (yc924844040@foxmail.com).

References

  1. Tang LL, Chen WQ, Xue WQ et al (2016) Global trends in incidence and mortality of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett 374(1):22–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J (2019) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 394(10192):64–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan JJ, Ng WT, Zong JF et al (2016) Prognostic nomogram for refining the prognostication of the proposed 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer 122(21):3307–3315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong KCW, Hui EP, Lo KW et al (2021) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18(11):679–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peng H, Dong D, Fang MJ et al (2019) Prognostic value of deep learning PET/CT-based radiomics: potential role for future individual induction chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 25(14):4271–4279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng WT, Yuen KT, Au KH, Chan OS, Lee AW (2014) Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma–the past, the present and the future. Oral Oncol 50(6):549–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang SH, O’sullivan B (2017) Overview of the 8th edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 18(7):40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dong D, Fang MJ, Tang L et al (2020) Deep learning radiomic nomogram can predict the number of lymph node metastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer: an international multicenter study. Ann Oncol 31(7):912–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang X, Li Q, Cai J et al (2020) Predicting the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas appearing as ground-glass nodule on CT scan using multi-task learning and deep radiomics. Transl Lung Cancer Res 9(4):1397–1406

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang L, Dong D, Zhang W et al (2020) A deep learning risk prediction model for overall survival in patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter study. Radiother Oncol 150:73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Daoud B, Morooka K, Kurazume R, Leila F, Mnejja W, Daoud J (2019) 3D segmentation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma from CT images using cascade deep learning. Comput Med Imaging Graph 77:101644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang S, Tang F, Huang X et al (2019) Deep-learning-based detection and segmentation of organs at risk in nasopharyngeal carcinoma computed tomographic images for radiotherapy planning. Eur Radiol 29(4):1961–1967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin L, Dou Q, Jin YM et al (2019) Deep learning for automated contouring of primary tumor volumes by MRI for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiology 291(3):677–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang L, Wu X, Liu J et al (2021) MRI-based deep-learning model for distant metastasis-free survival in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 53(1):167–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. He KZX, Ren S et al (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE

  17. Vaswani ASN, Parmar N (2017) Attention is all you need. arXiv 2017

  18. Paszke AGS, Massa F (2019) PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703

  19. Wu BXC, Dai X (2020) Visual transformers: token-based image representation and processing for computer vision. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.03677

  20. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980

  21. An C, Li D, Li S et al (2022) Deep learning radiomics of dual-energy computed tomography for predicting lymph node metastases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49(4):1187–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu Q, Wang G, Song X et al (2022) Machine learning based on MRI DWI radiomics features for prognostic prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 14(13):3201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li S, Deng YQ, Hua HL et al (2022) Deep learning for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognostication based on pre- and post-treatment MRI. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 219:106785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Qiang M, Li C, Sun Y et al (2021) A prognostic predictive system based on deep learning for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 113(5):606–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang G, Mudgal P, Wang L et al (2021) TCR repertoire characteristics predict clinical response to adoptive CTL therapy against nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 10(1):1955545

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao X, Liang YJ, Zhang X et al (2022) Deep learning signatures reveal multiscale intratumor heterogeneity associated with biological functions and survival in recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49(8):2972–2982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JY, Park JE, Jo Y et al (2019) Incorporating diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI into a radiomics model improves diagnostic performance for pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol 21(3):404–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li G, Li L, Li Y et al (2022) An MRI radiomics approach to predict survival and tumour-infiltrating macrophages in gliomas. Brain 145(3):1151–1161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu Y, He Z, Ouyang J et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics predicts preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis to support surgical decisions and is associated with tumor microenvironment in invasive breast cancer: a machine learning, multicenter study. EBioMedicine 69:103460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang B, He X, Ouyang F et al (2017) Radiomic machine-learning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett 403:21–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM et al (2017) Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14(12):749–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G et al (2020) Introduction to radiomics. J Nucl Med 61(4):488–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yip SS, Aerts HJ (2016) Applications and limitations of radiomics. Phys Med Biol 61(13):R150-166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. Springer, pp 770–778

    Google Scholar 

  35. Khan H (2018) DM-L based feature extraction and classifier ensemble for object recognition. J Signal Inf Process 9:92–110

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dong D, Tang L, Li ZY et al (2019) Development and validation of an individualized nomogram to identify occult peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 30(3):431–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Koshimizu H, Kojima R, Okuno Y (2020) Future possibilities for artificial intelligence in the practical management of hypertension. Hypertens Res 43(12):1327–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J (2020) Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res 99(7):769–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Streich J, Romero J, Gazolla J et al (2020) Can exascale computing and explainable artificial intelligence applied to plant biology deliver on the United Nations sustainable development goals? Curr Opin Biotechnol 61:217–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor JET, Taylor GW (2021) Artificial cognition: How experimental psychology can help generate explainable artificial intelligence. Psychon Bull Rev 28(2):454–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chan KCA, Woo JKS, King A et al (2017) Analysis of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA to screen for nasopharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 377(6):513–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [Grant Nos. 2020J011220 and 2020J011236], the Key Medical and Health Projects in Xiamen (Grant No. 3502Z20209002), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 81772893].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CY, QL, and LSW conceived the idea. CY and YC designed the study. LCZ collected the data. YC finished the content analysis. QL and YC helped editing the article pictures. CY and YC drafted the manuscript. QL and LSW reviewed and corrected the manuscript. CY and YC have contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liansheng Wang or Qin Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors claim that there are no potential conflicts of interest in the study.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University Ethical Review Committee (XMCTRC-2022-01), and informed consent was not required due to its retrospective nature.

Consent for publication

All authors have given their consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Chen, Y., Zhu, L. et al. A deep learning MRI-based signature may provide risk-stratification strategies for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 5039–5047 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08084-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08084-9

Keywords

Navigation