Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for sublingual immunotherapy of allergic rhinitis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Guidelines are intended to facilitate evidence-based clinical decision-making and knowledge translation; however, the quality and rigor of the guidelines are different. This study was conducted to assess the quality of sublingual immunotherapy guidelines for allergic rhinitis, in order to provide a reference for evidence-based clinical treatment and management of sublingual immunotherapy.

Methods

Using both Chinese and English search methods, articles were obtained from PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP, and other databases from the construction of the database to September 2020. The AGREE II instrument was used by two researchers to independently evaluate the quality of the extracted articles, and the consistency of the researchers was evaluated using the inter-group correlation coefficient.

Results

Ten articles were included in this study, of which two articles ranked A level, six articles ranked B level, and two articles ranked C level. The six sections of AGREE II included scope and aim, clarity, participant, applicability, rigor, and editorial independence, with standardized scores of 78.06%, 45.83%, 42.81%, 77.50%, 50.42%, and 46.25%, respectively.

Conclusion

The quality of the current guidelines for sublingual immunotherapy is average. The formulation methodology and reporting standards of these guidelines must be developed. By standardizing the treatment of sublingual immunotherapy properly, it is recommended that guideline makers refer to the AGREE II to formulate high-quality guidelines and promote their wide application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Shifan Han, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bousquet J, Schünemann HJ, Togias A et al (2020) Next-generation Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines for allergic rhinitis based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and real-world evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol 145:70–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan AW, Luk WP, Fung LH et al (2019) The effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis and its co-morbid conditions. Immunotherapy 11:1387–1397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Novakova SM, Novakova PI, Yakovliev PH et al (2018) A Three-year course of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy appears effective in controlling the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 32:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox LS (2017) Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: is 2-year treatment sufficient for long-term benefit? JAMA 317:591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng Y, Luo L, Hu Y et al (2016) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol 16:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez-Martinez CE, Sossa-Briceño MP, Acuña-Cordero R (2017) Quality assessment of acute viral bronchiolitis clinical practice guidelines. J Eval (Clin Pract) 23:37–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brouwers MC, Kerkvliet K, Spithoff K (2016) The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines. BMJ 352:i1152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Shallwani SM, King J, Thomas R et al (2019) Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines with physical activity recommendations for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. PLoS ONE 14:e0214846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lei C, Zhen D, Wei K (2015) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis (2015, Tianjin). International Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 51(1):6–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Canonica GW, Cox L, Pawankar R et al (2014) Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update. World Allergy Organ J 7:6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jutel M, Bartkowiak EM, Bręborowicz A et al (2016) Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)—indications, mechanism, and efficacy Position paper prepared by the Section of Immunotherapy, Polish Society of Allergy. Ann Agric Environ Med 23:44–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker SM, Durham SR, Till SJ et al (2011) Immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy 41:1177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaur SN, Kumar R, Singh AB, Agarwal MK, Arora N (2019) Guidelines for practice of allergen immunotherapy in India: 2017-an update. Clin Allergy 21(437):3

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halken S, Larenas-Linnemann D, Roberts G et al (2017) EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: prevention of allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 28:728–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seidman MD, Gurgel RK, Lin SY et al (2015) Clinical practice guideline: allergic rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 152:197–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li H, Chen S, Cheng L et al (2019) Chinese guideline on sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and asthma. J Thorac Dis 11:4936–4950

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Masuyama K, Goto M, Takeno S et al (2016) Guiding principles of sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis in Japanese patients. Auris Nasus Larynx 43:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng L, Chen J, Fu Q et al (2018) Chinese society of allergy guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 10:300–353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffmann-Eer W, Siering U, Neugebauer E et al (2018) Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use. BMC Health Servs Res 18:143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seto K, Matsumoto K, Kitazawa T et al (2017) Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE instrument: comparison between data obtained from AGREE I and AGREE II. BMC Res Notes 10:716

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shifan Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Zhu, R., Ning, Y. et al. Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for sublingual immunotherapy of allergic rhinitis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 4319–4325 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08083-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08083-w

Keywords

Navigation