Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pedicled thoracoacromial artery compound flaps for circumferential hypopharyngeal reconstruction

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Total laryngeal and hypopharyngeal resection remained to be the mainly treatment option for advanced hypopharyngeal cancer, which resulted in complicated reconstructive challenge for circumferential hypopharyngeal defect. The pedicled thoracoacromial artery compound flaps included Thoracoacromial artery perforator (TAAP) flap and pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap. This study is to evaluate the clinical application of the pedicled thoracoacromial artery compound flaps for circumferential hypopharyngeal reconstruction.

Methods

From May 2021 to April 2022, four hypopharyngeal cancer patients with circumferential hypopharyngeal defects were reconstructed by the pedicled thoracoacromial artery compound flaps. All patients were males. Patient age ranged from 35 to 62 years (average, 50 years). The Shoulder function were evaluated by SPADI. The average follow-up was 10.25 months (range from 4 to 18 months).

Results

All of the pedicled thoracoacromial artery compound flaps in our study survived. The defect length between tongue base and cervical esophagus ranged from 8 to 10 cm after total laryngeal and hypopharyngeal resection. The TAAP flap size ranged from 6 × 7 cm to 7 × 10 cm, and the PMMC flap size ranged from 6 × 7 cm to 9 × 12 cm. The pedicle length of TAAP and PMMC flaps varied, respectively, from 5 to 8 cm (mean 6.5 cm) and 7 cm to 11 cm (mean 8.75 cm). The mean time of TAAP and PMMC flaps harvest was, respectively, 82 min and 39 min. All patients were able to resume soft diet in the fourth week of postoperation, but one patient was operated by gastrostomy in the second month of postoperation because of pharyngeal cavity stenosis, and the patient successfully resumed oral soft diet by endoscopic balloon dilation after postoperation radiotherapy. All patients have resumed oral feeding at last. There were mild dysfunction for our patients according to SPADI during the mid–long follow-up.

Conclusions

The pedicled thoracoacromial artery compound flaps have stable blood supply and provide adequate muscle coverage for greater protection during radiotherapy, and the microsurgical skills have no requirement. Therefore, the compound flaps provide a good choice for the reconstruction of circumferential hypopharyngeal defect, especially in the aged or patients with comorbidities who are not able to tolerate prolonged surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data sets presented in this article are not freely available because of patient confidentiality and participant privacy terms.

References

  1. Kwon DI, Miles BA (2019) Hypopharyngeal carcinoma: do you know your guidelines? Head Neck 41(3):569–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei WI, Chan JYW (2019) Surgical treatment of advanced staged hypopharyngeal cancer. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 83:66–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marzouki H, Addas MA, Nujoom M, Zawawi F, Almarzouki HZ (2022) Hypopharyngeal reconstruction: possibilities, outcomes, and updates for improving the human health for quality of life. Comput Intell Neurosci 2022:6132481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel RS, Goldstein DP, Brown D, Irish J, Gullane PJ, Gilbert RW (2010) Circumferential pharyngeal reconstruction: history, critical analysis of techniques, and current therapeutic recommendations. Head Neck 32(1):109–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gooi Z, Gourin CG, Boahene KD, Byrne PJ, Richmon JD (2015) Temporal trends in head and neck cancer surgery reconstruction. Head Neck 37(10):1509–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geddes CR, Tang M, Yang D, Morris SF (2003) An assessment of the anatomical basis of the thoracoacromial artery perforator flap. Can J Plastic Surg = Journal canadien de chirurgie plastique 11(1):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anehosur V, Dikhit PS, Nagraj N, Jayade B, Kumar N (2020) PMMC flap revisited and its clinical outcome in 150 patients. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 19(1):26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tripathi M, Parshad S, Karwasra RK, Singh V (2015) Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: an experience in 100 consecutive cases. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 6(1):37–41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel K, Lyu DJ, Kademani D (2014) Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 26(3):421–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song D, Pafitanis G, Pont LEP, Yang P, Koshima I, Zhang Y, Iida T, Zhou X, Li Z (2018) Chimeric thoracoacromial artery perforator flap for one-staged reconstruction of complex pharyngoesophageal defects: a single unit experience. Head Neck 40(2):302–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Z, Cui J, Zhang YX, Levin LS, Zhou X, Spinelli G, Lazzeri D, Persichetti P (2014) Versatility of the thoracoacromial artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstructive Microsurg 30(7):497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Breckenridge JD, McAuley JH (2011) Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI). J Physiother 57(3):197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kc S, Sharma S (2021) Measurement properties of translated versions of the shoulder pain and disability index: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 35(3):410–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scaglioni MF, Lin TS, Chen YC, Tsai YT, Yang CH, Wu CC, Kuo PJ, Hsieh CH, Yang JC (2018) The free inverted omega-shaped flap for circumferential hypopharyngeal reconstruction with simultaneous neck skin defect. Microsurgery 38(1):51–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu P, Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ, Baumann DP, Lewin JS, Weber RS, Robb GL (2010) Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap after total laryngopharyngectomy. Cancer 116(7):1718–1724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aksoyler D, Losco L, Sert G, Chen SH, Chen HC (2021) Risks of laparoscopic harvest of free intestinal flaps for esophageal reconstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Techniques 31(6):742–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen HC, Rampazzo A, Gharb BB, Wong MTC, Mardini S, Chen HY, Salgado CJ (2008) Motility differences in free colon and free jejunum flaps for reconstruction of the cervical esophagus. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1410–1416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin YS, Mousavi SA, Chen HC (2022) Free colon tissue transfer for the management of xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients: a bacteriological study and clinical case series. J Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surg 75(8):2676–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayden RE, Nagel TH (2013) The evolving role of free flaps and pedicled flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 21(4):305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH (2002) Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plastic Reconstructive Surg 109(7):2219–2226 (discussion 2227-2230)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu P (2004) Characteristics of the anterolateral thigh flap in a Western population and its application in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 26(9):759–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spyropoulou GA, Kuo YR, Chien CY, Yang JC, Jeng SF (2009) Buried anterolateral thigh flap for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction: our method for monitoring. Head Neck 31(7):882–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang JC, Kuo YR, Hsieh CH, Jeng SF (2007) The use of radial vessel stump in free radial forearm flap as flap monitor in head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 59(4):378–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan NC, Yeh MC, Shih HS, Nebres RP, Yang JC, Kuo YR (2011) Single free anterolateral thigh flap for simultaneous reconstruction of composite hypopharyngeal and external neck skin defect after head and neck cancer ablation. Microsurgery 31(7):524–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sagar B, Marres HA, Hartman EH (2010) Hypopharyngeal reconstruction with an anterolateral thigh flap after laryngopharyngeal resection: results of a retrospective study on 20 patients. J Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surg 63(6):970–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Saint-Cyr M, Schaverien M, Rohrich RJ (2009) Preexpanded second intercostal space internal mammary artery pedicle perforator flap: case report and anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(6):1659–1664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hofer SO, Mureau MA (2010) Pedicled perforator flaps in the head and neck. Clin Plastic Surg 37(4):627–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajan R, Reddy S, Rajan R (1997) The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 49(4):368–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Girhe V, Auti AA, Girhe P, Wagre R (2021) Nuts and bolts of PMMC flap in oral cancer and its clinical outcome in 168 Indian patients: a retrospective analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 11(2):361–364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahieu R, Colletti G, Bonomo P, Parrinello G, Iavarone A, Dolivet G, Livi L, Deganello A (2016) Head and neck reconstruction with pedicled flaps in the free flap era. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 36(6):459–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Deng D, Xu F, Liu J, Li B, Li L, Liu J, Chen F (2020) Clinical application of pedicled thoracoacromial artery perforator flaps for tracheal reconstruction. BMC Surg 20(1):299

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Morshed K, Szymański M, Gołabek W (2005) Reconstruction of the hypopharynx with U-shaped pectoralis major myocutaneous flap after total pharyngo-laryngectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262(4):259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2020jcyj-msxmX1098) and the Joint Science and Health Project of Chongqing (2020FYYX221).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: ZW, GH. Methodology: ZW, QZ, GH. Data curation: WM, XW. Writing—original draft preparation: ZW, WM. Writing—review and editing, all authors. Visualization: ZW, GH. Supervision: GH. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guohua Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective review of medical records was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Ma, W., Wang, X. et al. Pedicled thoracoacromial artery compound flaps for circumferential hypopharyngeal reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 4641–4647 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08069-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08069-8

Keywords

Navigation